Comments by "WhatAboutTheBee" (@WhatAboutTheBee) on "The Russian Dude" channel.

  1. 38
  2. 26
  3. 19
  4. 18
  5. 17
  6. 16
  7. 14
  8. 13
  9. 11
  10. 10
  11. 10
  12. 10
  13. 9
  14. 9
  15. 9
  16. 9
  17. 8
  18. 8
  19. 8
  20. 7
  21. 7
  22. 7
  23. 7
  24. 7
  25. 7
  26. 6
  27. 6
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. 4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 3
  61. 3
  62. 3
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77.  @Roger_Gadd  Ukraine will force russia out just like the Mujahideen forced them out of Afghanistan. You see, Ukraine doesn't have to win in the traditional sense, they just have to keep fighting until russia decides enough is enough. In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine. Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part. Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia needs to occupy with 880,000 troopers. russia doesn't have those numbers. Not even close. For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the reality is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. For 20 years. russia has nowhere close to those numbers. russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker. russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will.
    2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81.  @thephoenix756  Here is some military science for a russian troll. In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine. Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part. Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia would need to occupy with 880,000 troopers IF THE POPULATION WAS DOCILE. For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the REALITY is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. russia has nowhere close to those numbers. Further, it must be generational, so 3.3M troops for a generation or 20 years. russia simply doesn't have the stamina russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker. russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will. Got that Moskal?
    2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128.  @bigboy9693  You know how to win wars Dmitry? Logistics and raw economic power, industrial output wins wars, not sending cruise missiles into apartment buildings. The West has sent a bunch of HIMARS launchers and innumerable GMLRS munitions to fire from them. How many HIMARS launchers will Ukraine require to win? 32, but that's not how many Ukraine will use. They will use more. Lots more. Russia hasn't been able to succesfully target one launcher, but the West will continue to supply new launchers. Good luck with that Dmitry. It is not the quantity of launchers that is important, it is the quantity of missiles. The next NDAA 2023 includes 106,000 GMLRS missiles in the authorization. Open wide! Learn how to swallow russia. GLSDB are now authorized, as well as Western tanks. Are you feeling lucky russia? How long until jets? ATACMS? Kerch Strait bridge go boom. How long will Victory take? Western resolve, Ukrainian resolve is for the long haul. Who cares how long it takes. 1 year, 5 years, 20 years? It does not matter. russia will be driven out of Ukraine. 115,00 russian dead so far. That is in 11 months, roughly 11.5K/month. At this rate, russia will incur 690,000 cargo 200 in 5 years. Makes me smile! 🙂 Remember that bit about economic power winning wars? russian GDP is ~1.8T USD. The countries supplying Ukraine have a combined GDP of 40T USD. Long term war is completely about logistics. Not firing the gun once, but firing over and over, but most importantly keeping it supplied. The economic advantage of the West to russia is 40 to 1.8 or a 22:1 advantage. If all things remain the same, russia has a 22:1 shortfall. But things aren't going to remain the same. Dear leader putin cut off European gas (meaning no income from Europe). Europe put a price cap on russian oil (meaning no profit from Europe). So go ahead russia, try to sell your shite elsewhere. Watch the Chinese and Indians negotiate russia on price into a hole. Which they have. The cap is $60, current trading in Ural Crude is ~$50/barrel. So the russian petro-economy will slowly implode, making the 22:1 economic ratio even steeper. The sanctions continue to constrict the russian economy. Even the russian central bank is declaring that the russian economy is shrinking. The state bank lies of course, the russian economy is collapsing.
    1
  129.  @bigboy9693  Here is some military science for a russian troll. In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine. Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part. Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia would need to occupy with 880,000 troopers IF THE POPULATION WAS DOCILE. For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the REALITY is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. russia has nowhere close to those numbers. Further, it must be generational, so 3.3M troops for a generation or 20 years. russia simply doesn't have the stamina russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker. russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will. Got that Moskal?
    1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134.  @graemepeters5717  You know how to win wars Dmitry? Logistics and raw economic power, industrial output wins wars, not sending cruise missiles into apartment buildings. The West has sent a bunch of HIMARS launchers and innumerable GMLRS munitions to fire from them. How many HIMARS launchers will Ukraine require to win? 32, but that's not how many Ukraine will use. They will use more. Lots more. Russia hasn't been able to succesfully target one launcher, but the West will continue to supply new launchers. Good luck with that Dmitry. It is not the quantity of launchers that is important, it is the quantity of missiles. The next NDAA 2023 includes 106,000 GMLRS missiles in the authorization. Open wide! Learn how to swallow russia. GLSDB are now authorized, as well as Western tanks. Are you feeling lucky russia? How long until jets? ATACMS? Kerch Strait bridge go boom. How long will Victory take? Western resolve, Ukrainian resolve is for the long haul. Who cares how long it takes. 1 year, 5 years, 20 years? It does not matter. russia will be driven out of Ukraine. 115,00 russian dead so far. That is in 11 months, roughly 11.5K/month. At this rate, russia will incur 690,000 cargo 200 in 5 years. Makes me smile! 🙂 Remember that bit about economic power winning wars? russian GDP is ~1.8T USD. The countries supplying Ukraine have a combined GDP of 40T USD. Long term war is completely about logistics. Not firing the gun once, but firing over and over, but most importantly keeping it supplied. The economic advantage of the West to russia is 40 to 1.8 or a 22:1 advantage. If all things remain the same, russia has a 22:1 shortfall. But things aren't going to remain the same. Dear leader putin cut off European gas (meaning no income from Europe). Europe put a price cap on russian oil (meaning no profit from Europe). So go ahead russia, try to sell your shite elsewhere. Watch the Chinese and Indians negotiate russia on price into a hole. Which they have. The cap is $60, current trading in Ural Crude is ~$50/barrel. So the russian petro-economy will slowly implode, making the 22:1 economic ratio even steeper. The sanctions continue to constrict the russian economy. Even the russian central bank is declaring that the russian economy is shrinking. The state bank lies of course, the russian economy is collapsing.
    1
  135. 1
  136.  @graemepeters5717  Here is some military science for a russian troll. In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine. Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part. Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia would need to occupy with 880,000 troopers IF THE POPULATION WAS DOCILE. For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the REALITY is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. russia has nowhere close to those numbers. Further, it must be generational, so 3.3M troops for a generation or 20 years. russia simply doesn't have the stamina russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker. russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will. Got that Moskal?
    1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163.  @kartikeyatiwari2502  Here is some military science for a russian troll. In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine. Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part. Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia would need to occupy with 880,000 troopers IF THE POPULATION WAS DOCILE. For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the REALITY is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. russia has nowhere close to those numbers. Further, it must be generational, so 3.3M troops for a generation or 20 years. russia simply doesn't have the stamina russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker. russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will. Got that Moskal?
    1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168.  @jamesgornall5731  Here is some military science for a russian troll. In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine. Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part. Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia would need to occupy with 880,000 troopers IF THE POPULATION WAS DOCILE. For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the REALITY is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. russia has nowhere close to those numbers. Further, it must be generational, so 3.3M troops for a generation or 20 years. russia simply doesn't have the stamina russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker. russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will. Got that Moskal?
    1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182.  @hugostiglitz8263  You know how to win wars Dmitry? Logistics and raw economic power, industrial output wins wars, not sending cruise missiles into apartment buildings. The West has sent a bunch of HIMARS launchers and innumerable GMLRS munitions to fire from them. How many HIMARS launchers will Ukraine require to win? 32, but that's not how many Ukraine will use. They will use more. Lots more. Russia hasn't been able to succesfully target one launcher, but the West will continue to supply new launchers. Good luck with that Dmitry. It is not the quantity of launchers that is important, it is the quantity of missiles. The next NDAA 2023 includes 106,000 GMLRS missiles in the authorization. Open wide! Learn how to swallow russia. GLSDB are now authorized, as well as Western tanks. Are you feeling lucky russia? How long until jets? ATACMS? Kerch Strait bridge go boom. How long will Victory take? Western resolve, Ukrainian resolve is for the long haul. Who cares how long it takes. 1 year, 5 years, 20 years? It does not matter. russia will be driven out of Ukraine. 115,00 russian dead so far. That is in 11 months, roughly 11.5K/month. At this rate, russia will incur 690,000 cargo 200 in 5 years. Makes me smile! 🙂 Remember that bit about economic power winning wars? russian GDP is ~1.8T USD. The countries supplying Ukraine have a combined GDP of 40T USD. Long term war is completely about logistics. Not firing the gun once, but firing over and over, but most importantly keeping it supplied. The economic advantage of the West to russia is 40 to 1.8 or a 22:1 advantage. If all things remain the same, russia has a 22:1 shortfall. But things aren't going to remain the same. Dear leader putin cut off European gas (meaning no income from Europe). Europe put a price cap on russian oil (meaning no profit from Europe). So go ahead russia, try to sell your shite elsewhere. Watch the Chinese and Indians negotiate russia on price into a hole. Which they have. The cap is $60, current trading in Ural Crude is ~$50/barrel. So the russian petro-economy will slowly implode, making the 22:1 economic ratio even steeper. The sanctions continue to constrict the russian economy. Even the russian central bank is declaring that the russian economy is shrinking. The state bank lies of course, the russian economy is collapsing.
    1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214.  @XopBaTZ  в следующий раз предоставьте свою иррациональную оценку войны на русском языке. Таким образом, люди смогут увидеть вашу двусмысленную ложь об Украине такой, какая она есть. By the way, how presumptuous of you to assume anything about me Let us examine putin's war goals and evaluate how russia is doing 1) putin Goal: Push NATO back from the sh♤thole known as russia's borders. Evaluation: Finland joins NATO, border EXTENDED by 1,340 km. putin fails to achieve his goal. 2) putin Goal: replace President Zelenskyy with a puppet. Evaluation: russia humiliating retreat from Kyiv, no chance to replace President Zelenskyy. putin fails to achieve his goal. 3) putin Goal: demilitarize Ukraine, weaken its military. Evaluation: Ukraine’s armed forces increased from about 250,000 personnel before the war to 700,000 personnel and are now equipped with advanced Western weapons. The sh♡thole known as russia has no answer to HIMARS. Ukraine is far stronger today than anytime in the past. putin fails to achieve his goal. 4) putin Goal: De-nazify Ukraine. Evaluation: The only nazi in Ukraine are russians. If the sh♤thole wants to denazify Ukraine, they can achieve that by leaving. 5) putin Goal: Conquer Ukraine, annex all its lands. Evaluation: sh♤thole russian troops have taken Soledar, population 10,490. In fact, russians humiliating retreat near Kharkiv was followed by the laughable retreat near Kherson. 6) putin goal: preserve the russian language in Ukraine, stating that the russian language was being oppressed by Ukraine. Firstly, that's a demonstrably false accusation. Ukraine was not oppressing the language. Yet since the russian war, the invasion of Ukraine, the population of Ukraine is going out of their way to speak only Ukrainian. russian is not oppressed. Simply put, nobody wants to speak the language of invaders. Complete putin fail, achieves the opposite of his goal.
    1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236.  @Silver_Prussian  Let us examine putin's war goals and evaluate how russia is doing 1) putin Goal: Push NATO back from the sh♤thole known as russia's borders. Evaluation: Finland joins NATO, border EXTENDED by 1,340 km. putin fails to achieve his goal. 2) putin Goal: replace President Zelenskyy with a puppet. Evaluation: russia humiliating retreat from Kyiv, no chance to replace President Zelenskyy. putin fails to achieve his goal. 3) putin Goal: demilitarize Ukraine, weaken its military. Evaluation: Ukraine’s armed forces increased from about 250,000 personnel before the war to 700,000 personnel and are now equipped with advanced Western weapons. The sh♡thole known as russia has no answer to HIMARS. Tanks are on their way. GLSDB authorized. How much longer until jets and ATACMS? Ukraine is far stronger today than anytime in the past. putin fails to achieve his goal. 4) putin Goal: De-nazify Ukraine. Evaluation: The only nazi in Ukraine are russians. If the sh♤thole wants to denazify Ukraine, they can achieve that by leaving. 5) putin Goal: Conquer Ukraine, annex all its lands. Evaluation: In fact, russians humiliating retreat near Kharkiv was followed by the laughable retreat near Kherson. russia finally did achieve a great victory and captured Soledar, prewar population 10,490. russia only incurred 20,000 casualties to win this great victory, but those were Wagner. russian military cannot even achieve that. 6) putin goal: preserve the russian language in Ukraine, stating that the russian language was being oppressed by Ukraine. Firstly, that's a demonstrably false accusation. Ukraine was not oppressing the language. Yet since the russian war, the invasion of Ukraine, the population of Ukraine is going out of their way to speak only Ukrainian. russian is not oppressed. Simply put, nobody wants to speak the language of invaders. Complete putin fail, achieves the opposite of his goal.
    1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321.  @krotemitschield  Let us examine putin's war goals and evaluate how russia is doing 1) putin Goal: Push NATO back from the sh♤thole known as russia's borders. Evaluation: Finland joins NATO, border EXTENDED by 1,340 km. putin fails to achieve his goal. 2) putin Goal: replace President Zelenskyy with a puppet. Evaluation: russia humiliating retreat from Kyiv, no chance to replace President Zelenskyy. putin fails to achieve his goal. 3) putin Goal: demilitarize Ukraine, weaken its military. Evaluation: Ukraine’s armed forces increased from about 250,000 personnel before the war to 700,000 personnel and are now equipped with advanced Western weapons. The sh♡thole known as russia has no answer to HIMARS. Tanks are on their way. GLSDB authorized. How much longer until jets and ATACMS? Ukraine is far stronger today than anytime in the past. putin fails to achieve his goal. 4) putin Goal: De-nazify Ukraine. Evaluation: The only nazi in Ukraine are russians. If the sh♤thole wants to denazify Ukraine, they can achieve that by leaving. 5) putin Goal: Conquer Ukraine, annex all its lands. Evaluation: In fact, russians humiliating retreat near Kharkiv was followed by the laughable retreat near Kherson. russia finally did achieve a great victory and captured Soledar, prewar population 10,490. russia only incurred 20,000 casualties to win this great victory, but those were Wagner. russian military cannot even achieve that. 6) putin goal: preserve the russian language in Ukraine, stating that the russian language was being oppressed by Ukraine. Firstly, that's a demonstrably false accusation. Ukraine was not oppressing the language. Yet since the russian war, the invasion of Ukraine, the population of Ukraine is going out of their way to speak only Ukrainian. russian is not oppressed. Simply put, nobody wants to speak the language of invaders. Complete putin fail, achieves the opposite of his goal.
    1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1