Comments by "jdg" (@jdg9999) on "Piers Morgan Uncensored" channel.

  1. "oh you're crazy, how could you possibly think Israel has any influence over the American government!"
    36
  2. "What benefit has Americas got from supporting Israel" "Israel has been under a unique threat from people who want to destroy it" Lol wut?
    29
  3. Piers "but Hezbollah" - not sure if you're aware Piers, but "Hezbollah is bad tho" does not suddenly allow Israel to ignore international law standards for itself.
    13
  4. Funny how Piers Morgan is such an ardent defender of Israel, he seems to be far more exercised about defending Zionists than he ever has been about defending the British people.
    12
  5. Piers "Israel's so badass, with its American provided missile defense, and foreign countries needing to defend it"
    7
  6. It's funny that "divorce shouldn't be allowed" is considered some kind of insane view when it was basically one of the foundations of Western civilization for millennia, and is so entrenched in our customs that it's still part of the standard wedding vows.
    4
  7. "how else do you go after terrorists when they live among civilians?" Funy Piers, don't think you ever gave our own country latitude to act in that way. Did the RAF ever drop bombs from strike aircraft on Belfast? Bulldoze residential areas? Cut off water and power to Derry?
    2
  8. Six minutes and 20 seconds until "MUH WW2" - Darrly Cooper is right, it is a load bearing narrative that the establishment relies on to justify everything they do.
    2
  9. Almost everything Iran has done has been in response to having Israel and the US (and before that my own country, the UK) out to subjugate or destroy them. We've seen for example, that they can "get along" with even states who were their traditional enemies such as Saudi Arabia (who have come out and condemned the US and Israeli attacks on Iran)
    2
  10. Pier is such a nasty Russophobic bigot. I don't hate Russia because it's not 1980 any more and our own leaders in the West are closer to being Marxists than the Russians are.
    2
  11. That woman was such a liar. Moldova and Georgia were not "Russian invasions"
    2
  12. Sorry but the people saying Douglas "destroyed" Dave are literally delusional or liars. There is an objective truth lol. And no, I didn't "predecide" because I "don't like" "Douglas". I'd actually thought he'd move past his old neocon phase until he suddenly started up with it agan post Ukraine and October 7th, and had enjoyed most of what he'd had to say about immigration and the future of Europe etc during the 2010s. There are plenty of people who COULD make persuasive argument with regard to Israel etc, but Douglas didn't do that, so he lost, laughably. All he did was engage in logical fallacies (appeal to authority, ad hominem, inconsistency etc), and made perhaps a couple of incredibly basic correct points that no one disagreed with anyway (that sometimes people have bad motives for the arguments they make, and that sometimes people can't see the wood for the trees).
    2
  13. Everything she accused Russia of is stuff America does.
    2
  14. Having to call your oppnent in a debate a "foreign agent" or accuse them of using "Moscow talking points" just means you can't actually win the argument
    2
  15. There's tons of people in these comments that don't want to fund Israel or Ukraine. Interesting that no one like that is invited as a guest
    1
  16. "The Ukrainian people do not want to cede an inch of the land that has been taken to Vladimir Putin and the Russians" - Um, except this argument says that that land belongs to Ukrainian nationalists in Kyiv and Lviv, and not to THE ACTUAL PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE, WHO BUILT THE TOWNS AND CITIES THAT MAKE IT UP, AND WHO ARE ETHNIC RUSSIANS WHO WANT TO BE PART OF RUSSIA!!!. Piers is literally saying that Ukrainians in Kyiv get to say to ethnic Russians in the Donbass "you're not taking OUR land from us"
    1
  17. yeah you're the liar actually @andrejsgrazuls8513 
    1
  18. Piers really is an idiot. There's a difference between being willing to use nuclear weapons to protect your own country, and being willing to use them to protect an ally. Does anyone really believe Britain or America would provoke their own destruction by using nuclear weapons against Russia, if Russia used them in Ukraine?
    1
  19. So dishonest that he presents the options as being 1) Anti Ukraine funding and pro Israel funding 2) Pro Ukraine funding and pro Israel funding 3) Pro Ukraine funding and anti Israel funding Guess what Piers, it's possible to be anti Ukraine funding and anti Israel funding. World renowned economist Jeffrey Sachs, international relations professor John Mearsheimer, military analysts retd Colonels Daniel Davis and Douglas Macgregor.. and yet none of them are invited to a debate like this.
    1
  20. You brought up Southern Africa Piers, Mugabe in Zimbabwe was said by the same Western liberals like you to be showing "encouraging" behaviour as leader when he had just taken over lol, now the country is utterly destroyed. The fact that Syria hasn't gotten on with ethnically cleansing minorities yet doesn't mean they won't.
    1
  21. "Nelson Mandela was one of the greatest people in history and led his country into a more unified place" - lol, South Africa is now a collapsing far left anti-white state
    1
  22. He's promoting something ke knows to be untrue because he doesn't worship Churchill?
    1
  23. Dershowitz is a manipulative liar.
    1
  24. "It was a revolution that millions of people participated in" What a liar lol, it was maybe 10 to 15 thousand pro Western activists in Kiev.
    1
  25. "Backing strategic allies against America's enemies". Russia wouldn't be our enemy if it weren't for neocon shills like you
    1
  26. "Is there any moral argument? (except preventing the destruction of the planet)" lol
    1
  27. "Iran attacked Israel" - this game neocons play where history starts at whatever point is convenient to them is hilarious. "Russia invaded Ukraine" "Iran attacked Israel" lol
    1
  28. Piers can't understand that Britain and America wouldn't voluntarily provoke their own destruction because Russia used a nuclear weapon against Ukraine? That countries wouldn't allow themselves to be obliterated purely to punsih Russia?
    1
  29. Tell me someone mocked Hodges' Ukrainian counteroffensive predictions.
    1
  30. Piers - "but isn't it just the authentic democratic spirit of the Syrian people?"
    1
  31. "The fact that Putin responsed to our provocation is proof that the provocation was justified" - Piers you are an utter dickhead
    1
  32. Yeah that's not an accurate portrayal piers, plenty of conservatives don't want to fund Ukraine OR Israel.
    1
  33. "he's not making an argument towards fact" - no, he's making an argument towards logic and morality, "fact" is not an argument, it's on observation of how things are.
    1
  34. How many sovereign countries have we illegally invaded Piers? What a dickhead lol
    1
  35. So Piers argument that destabilizing the Middle East and North Africa didn't cause refugee flows is that a decade later a third of migrants crossing into one Europen country are from Albania? Lol wut? So the biggest refugee wave in European histroy wasn't Syrians in 2015 after we destabilized Syria?
    1
  36. I love how whenever professor Mearsheimer totally wrecks him Piers just says nothing and pivots to a different topic
    1
  37. I love that Piers is literally unable to understand what a non universalist worldview is. He's amazed that Prof Mearsheimer can say that something could be good for the world, even while it was not in America's interests. In the neocon / liberal worldview, things are simply good and bad, there aren't different groups with different interests, there are "the good guys" and "the bad guys"
    1
  38. He's a neocon clown
    1
  39. I love how that woman says a few thousand activists on the street shpuld decide what happens to Georgia, npt the elected government.
    1
  40. “I was against it on two counts... First, the Japanese were ready to surrender, and it wasn’t necessary to hit them with that awful thing. Second, I hated to see our country be the first to use such a weapon.” Dwight Eisenhower, supreme allied commander, five-star general, and president of the United States. Piers is so hilariously ignorant. He thinks he knows that using nuclear weapons was obviously necessary, despite the fact that the man who led the Allied war effort thought the opposite.
    1
  41. "not calling for censorship" "should not be addressed by a comedian" - um, again playing it both ways just like Douglas Murray did. "I'm not calling for censorship I'm just saying you shouldn't be talking about this topic"
    1
  42. Moscow Marjorie? You're a neocon clown Piers.
    1
  43. Kisin sneering at the idea that Iran, a country that was literally just subjected to a surprise attack by Israel and the United States during nuclear disarmament negotiations, might want to enrich uranium as a deterrent
    1
  44. Piers "dropping a thousand pound bomb from a B-52 on a 5 year old Germany boy cowering with his mother in a basement in Dresden was self defence" Morgan.
    1