Comments by "JBW" (@jbw6823) on "Why it can be so hard to care about the climate crisis" video.

  1. The majority of the US believes the scientists, particularly the younger generation. Deniers, you have lost.
    3
  2.  Penny Liqueur No one cares what you think, troll.. Youve lost. Btw, your cap lock is stuck. Try jiggling it.
    3
  3. The us and india and Europe etc
    3
  4.  @craigrn16  If any of these characters is serious, not trolling or paid, its just remarkable. They are definitely in the flat earth category. So bizarre.
    2
  5.  @mightyshanolgorhythm6524  Dude, every single scientific society in the world, representing thousands of scientists, like me, concur with AGW. Every climate dept in every university in the world teaches it. The basics have been understood since the 1800s and, frankly, the basic mechanism is very simple. Literally millions of papers written by researchers all over world for years have been written pro/con over the years but pro has won out. To suggest that all that is somehow negated by a website written by a dude with no degree or real experience in climate science is just too ridiculous. Add in that he is supported by Heartland and the Koch's makes it worse. I think you have to consider the personal factors that make it difficult for you to accept extremely well established science.
    2
  6.  @mightyshanolgorhythm6524  I dont talk to piss covered loonies on the street shouting "the government!", so Im not wasting any more time with you. Suffice to say, the majority believes the scientists.Even Republicans are positing solutions and Trump is talking " A Trillion Trees". Denial is dead.
    2
  7.  @AdamTait-hy2qh  First I tell them the truth. Denial is dead. Tha majority in the us and most countries, particularly the younger gen, believe the scientists so their opinion doesnt matter. If they think they know some science, I ask them some arcane physics of climate thats not normally covered in typical denier arguments. That clears them out.
    1
  8.  @AdamTait-hy2qh  Also the vast majority of these are trolls. Others could be paid or politically deluded. So I dont respond. I block them on sight. Heres what trolls are... https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists%3famp
    1
  9.  The Inquisitor  Theories are actually well known areas of science suported by lots of data observation etc. Like the Theory of Gravity. What u mean us Hypothesis. However,I can assure u that Climate Sciences and evidence for AGW is well beyond the hypothesis stage. For example, go to Google Scholar, a database of scientific papers, and type in "man made climate change". The search will return literally MILLIONS of papers. AGW is not a hypothesis. It is a very well understood area of science. Every scientific society in the world agrees. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=man+made+climate+change&oq=man+made+climate
    1
  10.  The Inquisitor  The fact that you dont know theory from hypothesis automatically renders any opinion you have as nonsense. You speak from ignorance. But it really doesn't matter. Denial is dead. The majority believe the scientists. You have lost. You are a minority and a whack one at that. I hear the Flat Earth Society needs more people. Try them.
    1
  11.  The Inquisitor  ok, tell me, whats the role of blackbody radiation in current models.
    1
  12.  The Inquisitor  dumbshit..they collect the published papers from science journals into a database so you can find them in one place. They dont generate them. I mean, be a troll but not a fucking stupid one. I know your interest is really in arguing and trying to get a rise out of me, but all I can think about is the disappointment of your parents when they found out how stupid you are. Seriously. Im going to do a screen capture and show my friends your comment so we can have a good laugh. I imagine everyone else on this thread will do a face palm when read your remarks.
    1
  13.  The Inquisitor  Im sorry. Ive just gotta say it again.First, Your comment confusing hypothesis and theory and then piling on with the Google Scholar thing are some of the dumbest shit I have ever seen. You win. Damn.Im gonna be laughing about this for days. Thank you.
    1
  14.  @BurtParsonsMusic  oh no. Omg. Another one. You think Google makes up the papers in Google Scholar too. Like Vermin Supreme, I mean The Inquisitor does. Omg. I cant stop laughing. I gotta put down the phone.
    1
  15.  The Inquisitor  Most non-tech people believe the scientists. But then they see your comments and say, "Im so glad I went with the scientists!".
    1
  16.  @craigrn16  check out what the Inquisitor said about Google scholar. Omg.
    1
  17. Genius boy. You didnt answer my question about Blackbody Radiation and Climate
    1
  18.  @craigrn16 Deniers are either trolls, nuts, politicized, or paid. Or a combo The Inquisitor seems to fall in the nuts category
    1
  19.  The Inquisitor  You are self contradictory. You say we should disregard scientists but why would anyone believe some dipshit like you who doesnt even know the diff betwen hypothesis and theory. Who doesn't understand the science and doesnt understand what Google Scholar is. Fuck. You must be an idiot or just plain nuts.
    1
  20.  @craigrn16  Whats your tech background? Im a physicist in Silicon Valley.
    1
  21.  @BurtParsonsMusic  Explain in detail why everything here is wrong. https://history.aip.org/climate/index.htm
    1
  22.  @mightyshanolgorhythm6524  WUWT is run by Anthony Watts. No science degree. No degree at all. Funded by Heartland. He can be disregarded. You think actual degreed trained scientists are full of shit, but you believe this guy? Btw, "Gullible" is not in the dictionary. Really. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Watts_(blogger)
    1
  23.  @mightyshanolgorhythm6524  Every single scientific society in the world endorses AGW but you think a dude with no degree funded by oil interests knows more. Man, that is nuts. http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html
    1
  24.  @zoephin6205  Zoe we meet again. You are so full of shit. Another nut case.
    1
  25.  @zoephin6205  You made some comments on QM that were just ridiculous. So bizarre. Just thunking you know better than millions of scientists and years of theory and observations puts you in the whack job camp.
    1
  26.  @zoephin6205  oh yeah. Heres an entire American Istitute of Physis website. I suppose youll say its bogus or paid off. https://history.aip.org/climate/summary.htm
    1
  27.  @zoephin6205  I also note you only reference yourself. Weird. Narcissistic. Course u cant reference others cause your stuff is bullshit.
    1
  28.  @Gugner  what was the marker then?
    1
  29.  Bestoink Dooley  heres a list of those societies and links to them. http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html
    1
  30. No
    1
  31. Well, that was weird.
    1
  32.  @microsoft-pox  liar
    1
  33. ?
    1