Comments by "Anik Samiur Rahman" (@aniksamiurrahman6365) on "Asianometry"
channel.
-
108
-
53
-
52
-
46
-
45
-
40
-
34
-
32
-
30
-
30
-
25
-
21
-
20
-
18
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@AnyVideo999 Purchase power and wealth are comparable from any time/place. If French peasants from the 1700 has more purchase power or greater wealth, then they were indeed well off by any standard. And Tesla having such a ridiculous valuation, despite the fact that it adds nowhere close to that value to the market, rather shows the problem, not the lack of any.
That leads us to the "equilibrium" theory of yours. In an equilibrium, there should be no net change among the parts (Don't teach me Chemistry, I'm a Biochemist). Plz, tell me, if there's an equilibrium, then how on earth even American middle class is in such decline while the Über rich is on a meteoric growth? If your equilibrium has anyone but upper and upper middle class excluded from Capitalism, then it's essentially the same conclusion as Marx. There's no need of any revolution.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mth469 I don't think there's any such example ever in any history. If you're thinking Intel, mind it, Intel didn't become such a giant in a day. Also, mind it, when Intel started, the semiconductor industry was rather nascent, they didn't have to compete with giants to become a giant themselves. Some version of this story is true for every giant in every sector - Ford, Boeing, Google, TSMC, you name it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Martin If you patent something, and I reproduce the technology in-house, using only the information available in the patent paper, it's not stealing. It's just a similar technology, which can be patented in the same nation, with just little modifications. How little? If your team of lawyers are really crafty (which they are for big companies), you'll just need to change the documentation. Happens all the time bruh, so, maybe wake up from idealist dream?
Also, tell me how do they just "steal"? If you're talking about corporate espionage, US companies still tops others in that by a wide margin. So, maybe, drink a little less cool aid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@xboxstudent First off, I'm not an Indian, neither is Pakistani. Second, yes, China and also South-East Asia is way ahead of our entire region. But not N. Korea. Just find me a Uni in N. Korea that matches IIT, India, I won't even ask about N. Korea's economy. Lastly, don't delude yourself that except for the GDP figures, China, India or anyone here will ever surpass the west in any near future. China is technologically catching up pretty fast, but just remember US/Europe are still the one who make the trend - AI, space exploration, stem cell, nanotech or whatever, all are their brainchild, no matter what we're achieving in these.
1
-
Hans Otto Kroeger Kaethler Wow! Are you a paranoid alt-right American or another NK citizen? No amount of evidence will persuade an idiot. Except Iran, Turkey, Iraq (under Saddam), Libya (under Gaddafi), Syria (under Asad Sr.) all are far more capable countries with way more diplomatic ties than NK, all of them failed to gain nuclear capability, despite many desperate attempts. Don't trust me, go check their GDP, ranking of their Uni, their political history of recent time etc. What are the chances that NK with far weaker economy and human resource will succeed? No gut feelings, formal Bayesian analysis will show that there's very little chance.
The disclosed info about how India and Pakistan gained this capability show the Everest high hurdles. So better try to know about those, instead of shouting irrelevant quotes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1