Comments by "Mat Broomfield" (@matbroomfield) on "Multiple US NAVY Sensors Detected Something "Impossible" | Scientifically Authenticated UFOs" video.

@annaclarafenyo8185 Your explanation is as simplistic as the "It's aliens" people Anna. One solution does NOT fit all situations.
3
@annaclarafenyo8185 You're nothing if not confident. Can you please outline your relevant expertise?
2
What's more likely, that lifeforms crossed the unfathomably huge distances of space to come buzz around our skies, or that an existing government improvved their technology just a little bit? It's far more likely to be something terrestrial in origin - we've NEVER had evidence of even the right CONDITIONS for life outside our solar system, much less, the actual existence of it.
1
@annaclarafenyo8185 "It fits ONLY THE REMAINING UNSOLVED SITUATIONS AFTER ALL OTHER EXPLANATIONS ARE EXHAUSTED." I'm sorry Anna but it absolutely does not. Optics and light does not produce radar echoes for a start. In many cases, optical effects are viewer location dependent, yet sometimes these UAPs are viewable from disparate standpoints. On one hand, given the laughable comments made by the Navy's trained pilots in recent TV interviews (who really were NEVER the expert witnessess they were portrayed to be), I tend to dimiss the "expertise" of all witnesses, but on the other hand, I think overgeneralising, and over-simplifying does an injustice to the mystery.
1
@annaclarafenyo8185 "In June 2021, the US Director of National Intelligence released a report saying it had no explanation for dozens of unidentified flying objects related to 144 incidents dating back to 2004. Only one could be easily explained as a deflating balloon, while the others were labelled "largely inconclusive"." But I'm sure that you are better qualified to come to a determination.
1