Comments by "Mat Broomfield" (@matbroomfield) on "Ireland suspends Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid vaccine over blood clots - BBC News" video.

Hundreds of millions of doses administered. That's orders of magnitude higher than the number of people in ANY drug trial ever administered. And that's on top of the years or decades already accumulated on the TYPE of vaccine. How much data do you think is reasonable?
3
@mikjoe125 Hundreds of millions of people have taken these vaccines, most without incident. If you gave MILK to that many people, some would die within minutes of drinking it; soe would have heart attacks and some would get hit by cars. Correlation does not equal causation. All the facts suggest that these vaccines STRENGTHEN our immune systems, not only improving covid resistance, but general immune resilience.
2
@mikjoe125 "It hasn't happened to me so I don't need to protect against it" Is that seriously what you think constitutes an argument? You haven't had cancer. Until you have. You haven't accidentally gotten a women pregnant when you didn't mean to, until you do. Your immune system gets weaker as you get older, although ironically catching and recovering from SOME viruses improvemes it in the long run. " its a rebrand of the flu to take our freedom so we are stuck at home" Oh dear, is that what you think? And why would they do that then?
1
@mikjoe125 I don't believe you comrade.
1
@petek5021 Absolutely not. It was not the risk of death that was the problem with covid, but the risk overwhelming our HEALTH SERVICE with infectees.
1
@markabrahams2191 I absolutely refuse to believe that there was a conspiracy to shut down the global economy. Not necause I don't believe the wealthy or powerful are not that evil; not because conspiracies do not exist, but because I just don't believe that a conspiracy requiring the compliance of so many enemies, let alone the millions of experts with no allegiance could be kept secret. I definitely lean towards "Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence," But in this case, I suspect that there are more mundane explainations, assuming that you are reporting the facts accurately. That said, what treatments are you referring to?
1
@markabrahams2191 The idea of this being bioengineered has been widely debunked. Here's a good article explaining why that can be demonstrated https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/04/26/no-coronavirus-is-not-biological-weapon/ As for China's refusal to allow outside investigators, even if they were not massively secretive by political culture, why the hell WOULD they allow outside investigators?! At BEST the implication would be that they are too stupid to discover the cause on their own, and at worst the implication is that this was deliberate. I VERY MUCH doubt that any sovereign nation with the muscle to refuse would accept foreign investigators under similar circumstances. You talk about chloraquin as a perfectly good preventative but one serious side effect is that it causes permanent damage to the retina. Given that Irenland just just down its entire vaccination program over just 4 cases of alleged blood clotting, how many people do you think would be willing to risk their eyesight to reduce the risk of a virus that was never a likely a danger to them in the first place? Indeed, emergency use authorisation was revoked by the FDA, and trials of both Chroloquin and Hydroxychloroquin are nowceased due to their detrimental side effects, not least of which was a significant increase in heart attacks. https://www.webmd.com/lung/coronavirus_chloroquine I wouldn't call your research sad Mark, but I would suggest that it is incomplete. Your claims about the Dr Fauci article are incorrect and have also been debunked. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/may/06/blog-posting/dont-fall-conspiracy-about-dr-anthony-fauci-hydrox/
1
4 people out of tens of millions of doses without serious side-effects. They've got to be out of their minds to stop vaccinating over that.
1