Comments by "Mat Broomfield" (@matbroomfield) on "Could the Loch Ness Monster be a Plesiosaur?" video.

  1. It's ridiculous based on ZERO evidence, plucked straight out of Trey's butt.
    4
  2. So you want to replace one 99% improbable creature, with an even stupider 99.9999999999999% improbable creature? Great job. Except it fails on EXACTLY the same hurdle as a plesiosaur, which at least actually existed at one point in the past (and suppositions about its neck mobility are exactly that - suppositions). The idea of a population of leeches growing unnoticed whilst living off the blood of sheep (also unnoticed), presumably evolving (unnoticed) into 50 or 100 foot monsters is prepeosterous. Is there evidence that food is the limiting factor on leech size for instance? Far more likely that their actually body composition and mobility are what stops them growing larger, to say nothiong of how their entire structure would need to change in order to become mobile on land. You just shot your entire presentation in the foot with that stupid aside. How disappointing.
    1