Comments by "Mat Broomfield" (@matbroomfield) on "Graham's Number Escalates Quickly - Numberphile" video.

  1. 64 times? Why not 65? Why not arrow 64? I don't really understand the point of arbitrarily large numbers - especially ones that can't be worked with. I don't even understand why fix with arrow notation - that in itself seems arbitrary and unworkable within almost no iterations.
    2