Comments by "D. von N." (@D.von.N) on "A Different Bias" channel.

  1. I would care less about asking for a private session in order not to be exposed, but more about her asking whether she could claim the penalty in her expenses, literally asking the taxpayer to foot her bill for crime. THAT was more outrageous than this IMO.
    25
  2. There was this credo going around: don't interrupt an enemy when they are making a mistake.
    19
  3. I wonder what she has on him... maybe.
    17
  4. Just not when it comes to the gen.ocide of Palestinians... there he stands with the international laws breaker. Is he really a human rights lawyer? His recent deeds don't show it.
    13
  5. Watching BBC last night, that interview with a female aide, my impression is that some men think that if they get into the higher ranks of politics, it gives them permission to treat others like their property, that anyone owes them sexual favours on demand. And for years they felt safe in the club doing just that.
    13
  6. There must be some alternative to Twitter/X. We cannot keep being complicit in this crookedness. Now Twitter couple with Google ads I have heard, to ramp up revenue. Not with me involved. I have a good adblock and I don't go on Twitter anymore. If more people did it, and used some other useful platform, that would give these crooks a lesson.
    10
  7. So the bottom line is that Cruella doesn't care about the success of the party, she just wants the PM pension, like lettuce did. Am I reading it right? Then she will hav some extra funds to pay for her speeding tickets and not rely on the ministerial expenses scheme, as she hoped the other day. Poor girl.
    9
  8. My thought is she doesn't know what she is doing, but for a moment she got her 5 seconds of spotlight, again, thinking how she was going to show us all... She showed it to all of us. LOL
    6
  9. She is in contempt of everything and everyone, including democracy and human rights. And definitely she must have bught her legal qualifications as she is as ignorant of the law as one can be.
    4
  10. I just clicked here to say I h.ate those AI images. I tend to block channels using them.
    4
  11. That won't stop the proPalestinian rallies, because Starmer is a Washington pup, standing with the oppressive Israeli regime and Tories in opposition would not hesitate to attack him for that (those rallies). Just the blame would shift on the Labour. Starmer, especially as a human rights lawyer, is such a disappointment. In his eyes Palestinians perhaps aren't humans.
    3
  12. come on, stop those ridiculous AI images. Plenty of real ones around.
    3
  13. Wait a moment, are you saying Ricsi is not controlling the circus? 😂
    3
  14. LOL Phil, you are spot on about Big Brother. I never watched one full episode. And I neither did of any similar show... there is so much of more interesting things to watch, even a Springwatch on BBC has a better value for me than those preposterous celebrities or niemands (show specific) discussing nothing much, really, sometimes just revealing the vacuum in their heads, with a couple brain cells that regulate breathing and breeding and otherwise a piece of string holding ears together or they would fall apart from the skull. As for Lee Anderson, you know the medium by their staff... he fits there, he was the right for their regular audience (I cannot make myself following this crap for longer than 5 minutes).
    3
  15. you mis-spelled miss-spelled. Or is there a mr-spell, too?
    3
  16. You literally turned the history on its head.  @Gerhardium 
    2
  17. Raising interest rate would make a sense if people could afford paying their bills, including energy prices. But that isn't the case. What this stupid move does is people unable to pay their bills and dipping even deeper into debt to make ends meet. What happens to the extra hundreds each remortgaging household now pays each month? Isn't THAT driving the inflation up? And did this govt print mass of money recently to pay for the furlough scheme, many billions of which went to fraudsters and Rich refused to chase it back? Did the govt allow the extortionate energy prices? Here you have the reason for this sticky inflation. Instead of reducing the prices of essentials, let the nation bleed so the fat cats can keep their unearned bonuses.
    2
  18. To be fair: to prove defamation, you need to prove the person knew the info was false, or at least having a substantial belief it wasn't true. If anyone is guilty of defamation it is the Fail Online. It is their job to do the fact checking and only publish what is true. People sharing that shit are less responsible for the failures of the media. It is just about the time the law caught up with these crooks.
    2
  19. She said she is going to lead the party to the next elections... I can imagine that: from the back seat, with a duct tape across her mouth. Right!
    1
  20. LOL that name is funny. I had to double check the name, thinking his parents hated him before they named him LOL. Google found him immediately, on the top search.
    1
  21. I have heard that when she returned back from Scotland even heavens cried heavily!
    1
  22. RE tax on inheritance: you haven't created a new thing, the thing just changed hands. Who owned it before they already paid tax on it (either when purchasing it, or earning money and using this money to buy the then inherited thing). Similarly to pension: if you have a pension from savings from earning, on which you already paid tax, you don't pay another tax when you withdraw that money to support your pension. If that money was directed away from your salary and you haven't paid tax on it, then you will pay tax on that money when you withdraw it. I see the tax on inheritance quite unfair. At most I would promote tax on the value it increased since the last transfer, if it is something that goes for generations.
    1
  23. GBMoose... scrapping the bottom of the barrel.
    1
  24. Suella should be the fourth. She is a hell of a disgrace of a minister, ignorant about the law, racist language, hypocrite and dumb as a cotton swab.
    1
  25. When was that? After he lost a number of members over his warmongering rhetoric at the beginning?  @davidfarrow875 
    1
  26. Why did Boris go to Ukraine recently? Was it arranged long ago or did he try to escape media scrutiny in the earliest time of this new scandal?
    1
  27. Master of impersonation of BoJo. ROFL
    1
  28. You know, statistically, on maybe on the 157 984th time they will get the right person there.
    1
  29.  @WilliamWatt-xm2gu  She eventually paid it by herself, but that audacity even asking this question, like if the poor sod couldn't afford to pay the fine. Entitlement cannot speak louder from her. Plus that her so called 'qualifications', her past career... We are ruled by idiots.
    1
  30. BoJo wants to be the king of the world. Bad for him that that function doesn't exist yet and perhaps never will.
    1
  31. Isn't tupperware woke also? They should use newspapers to pack their food into, ideally those they read, so there is some actual use of them.
    1
  32. Daily Mail £1.40, £1.20 for subscribers. Not giving a penny and avoiding clicking on their references wherever I see them.
    1
  33. In contrary to the media outrage over the snake's definition of woman note, I don't think he is a transphobe. He is just using every tool in the box to attack his opponent, knowing he will have a support of transphobes. It is just a political tactics, nothing else. The return is easy for that question: from which point of view? Gender or sex? That would get ny such rat into a corner. It isn't really that dificult.
    1
  34. It can be so confusing when people make statements and don't cover everything evey side wants to hear. Suddenly others fill into the not said space their own stuff. What bothers me that there is always a great media coverage when the Palestinian side does something to Israel, but very little is informed when Israel does similar to the Palestinian side. A disproportionally greater number of Palestinians have died than Israeli over the years. AlJazeera has been covering the murder of their correspondent by the Israeli forces for months and months, almost daily. She was born Palestinian and was reporting on injustice the Palestinians were experiencing every day. I have heared nothing much about her killing in our media. She had a PRESS clothing and was shot into her head, twice I think. But when Hamas does something, suddenly everyone has Israeli flag in their profile. This will bother some people pretty much and that doesn't mean they are antisemitic. Hamas is simply hijacking the situation for their cause. But the elephant in the room is that situation over which the average Palestinians have no control, but Israel could do a lot if they wanted. But they don't want to. They are exploiting their importance in the region, take the US tax money and keep pushing the Palestinians more and more. If Israel had stayed within the borders agreed previously, Hamas would probably have no cause or we all would be united in its condemnation otherwise. So until Israel does the right thing and stops in its illegal activities, you will have people voicing their views and many being misunderstood. And we will periodically keep having this conversation over and over again.
    1
  35. They were actually punished way before 1948, just that year marked it official.
    1
  36. On the side note, only a few people know that in Is.rael the government now also rules over the supreme court. Figure that out. Like in Nazi germany or, the mentioned totalitarian RuSSia.
    1
  37. Looks like Dunning Kruger stands true to the name 😂😂😂
    1
  38. On one side of the spectrum, in the ideal world, the ministers in question would resign by themselves. On the other hand we have got a 2000 words report detailing the background of this cover-up which we would never learn if Rishi just sakced Zahawi and their supporters would keep giving a benefit of doubt. This way there is less of them now. So even if this investigation didn't need to happen, it is actually good it did. Unless, bringing my own conspiracy theory into it, it isn't true Zahawi kept the investigation secret and the report falsely says nobody knew, literally clearing the rest of the party from what they potentially knew and ignored. You can never be sure nowadays.
    1
  39. Public will not punish the government for it. The govt have packed up their pockets and will be voted out, carrying on as if nothing happened. Is Truss going to face consequences of her actions? Never. She will probably keep getting her PM pension for the rest of her life and mess up behind the screens as usually.
    1
  40. Why it wasn't leaked? It appears there is drip feeding with leaks, this one is maybe waiting for its time to come.
    1
  41. I have just watched on Novara Media taking their turn on Starmer, what a liar he is. Do you mind comment on that material they used?
    1
  42. He justified his step by limiting data stealing or something like that, and I suspect it may be something to do with AI that is trained on Twitter and alike. And he claims he invented AI. It came to my ears that he didn't even invent Tesla. Two other guys did, he just bought it. In addition Twitter has lost most of its value he paid for it and maybe he is trying to ramp up profit. But how advertisers will look at it? Limited exposure means less profit for them so they might pull out (many did already, is that a reason?). It was said that most of his wealth is in Tesla and Tesla has quite inflated value. If Tesla goes down (increased competition of other brands for less cost), so goes Elon (someone forecasted his bankruptcy in 5 years).
    1
  43. Listening and thinking, whether Farage is not trying to make his irrelevant existence politically relevant again. And yes, the bank has far more money available for a court case and I am sure they evaluated it prior making the action. Farage is a sad sod. Also the fact they kept him for all those years, but taking action just now, indicates it wasn't purely due to his political views. But the dumb audience swallowing these lies won't notice that.
    1
  44.  @gillb9222  she would need to have no self-worth in that case I think. Voluntarily making an idiot of herself like that, risking a criminal prosecution for her rhetoric, to make somebody else scoop the cream. And I don't think he would pay her to do that, even out of his hundreds £millions.
    1
  45.  @gillb9222  she looks to be off the scale, so maybe she could be the first one. We'll see.
    1
  46. Re shoe laces... I guess if they tried filming Boris, he would have a velcro instead. Kudos to Lee Anderson able to tie his shoe laces. That is a top skill in the right wing! Imagine Rishi asking a homeless man whether they work in business, himself unable to purchase a can of coke at the petrol station... something is telling me that super rich haven't earned their wealthy by a 'hard work' they try to impose on everyone else to earn peanuts.
    1
  47. Who will benefit from this is services providing VPN. Easy to avoid if you want to have a freedom in browsing. They would have to ban VPN.
    1
  48. Hard to say what was going on behind the closed doors, but what came to my attention could have been that they told Prigozhin: look, everyone you were going after to Moscow has fled. What will you do there? Whom will you get? And he didn't have enough men to command a city of many millions, like Ruscists didn't have enough manpower to occupy entire Ukraine for long.
    1
  49. Things aren't going too well for him recently, are they? Previously they bragged about independent enquiry for salaries, only until the enquiry suggested the % they didn't like.
    1
  50. But they still do...
    1