Comments by "D. von N." (@D.von.N) on "Louis Rossmann" channel.

  1. 661
  2. 81
  3. 26
  4. 18
  5. 14
  6. 13
  7. 11
  8. 10
  9. 8
  10. 8
  11. 6
  12. 6
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. Looks like youtube is using this grey area and the lack of clarification in the law for their own benefit. But they could as easily add to their cookie policy this little detail, that they will run a script to check for ad-blockers and if the users don't agree with it, they are free to exit youtube. It is a private platform and it is free to set its rules, within law, of course. There is a very easy way out of it. I am no lawyer, but I have saved myself a few bucks by looking into the fine print and T&Cs and found some holes that I could throw into the face of those who wanted to rip me off, Sky broadband including. Someone with a lot of knowledge, money and time could take Youtube to the court and at the end we shall see on whose side the court would lean. So far chat GPT said this: "The ePrivacy Directive, which is currently being revised as the ePrivacy Regulation, addresses privacy and confidentiality issues in the electronic communications sector. The new regulation is expected to strengthen privacy rules for electronic communications and may have implications for the use of tracking technologies, including scripts to detect ad-blockers. It's important to note that legal interpretations may change, and new regulations may have been introduced since my last update. Therefore, it's advisable to check for the latest legal developments and consult legal professionals or official sources for the most up-to-date information on this matter." Otherwise Chat GPT confirms, the use of script for monitoring adblock isn't clearly defined. So the title of this video might need to change, at least to make it a question.
    1