Comments by "D. von N." (@D.von.N) on "penguinz0"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We have Wendy's in the town, but I have never been there. Not a fast food person, I cook and prepare my meals most of the time, being frugal. What do you eat for lunch and dinner? I would only have a burger for breakfast in my younger years, when I did eat some junk and after the disco night. I didn'tdo it, but that would be the time I would. Had a lovely wholesome porrige this morming, with some milled flax seeds, honey, raisins, pinch of salt, and poured the cooked goo over frozen berries. They thawed fast and cooled the oats at once so I could eat it faster. It kept me going for the next 5 hours. No sign of a metabolic syndrome by far. But I know tnat even slim people gorging on junk can develop diabetes over the years. The fat it makes you store in and around your liver is hard to get rid of. Beware.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There are terrabytes of content created every day worldwide and that needs to be stored on servers, which have limited capabilities and need to be developed and growing as we speak. That costs money to run and purchase, too. I understand that bit. But by aggressive advertising they only put people off watching content without adblock. Every 5 minutes content is interrupted by lengthy adverts, even in a middle of a sentence, which I find totally unpalatable and annoying. I can tolerate a 5 seconds ad at the beginning at most, otherwise I skip it however I can. The advert payout to the content creators is pitiful, nonetheless, so someone else is cashing in from all this. The ever growing content creation should be self-sustaining with more short adverts at the beginning, to cover the expenses of ever growing storage capacity. Paid subscription doesn't suit everyone who don't spend a lot of time on Youtube, so this option should not be enforced by endless adverts every few minutes. If Youtube disables people watching the content without adverts, it will mean no help to the creators, because even people with adblock comment on stuff, share the links elsewhere, and help creators this way. Disabling viewing content without adblock will penalise the creators the most.
1
-
1
-
Came to this again, seeing I have been here 4 months ago... just YESTERDAY youtube disabled me viewing stuff with adblock. On Firefox. I moved to Brave. If they disable it there, somebody will come with more sophisticated adblock, or I move to some other platform. Completely agree that the ads are too intrusive and even dangerous on many websites. I would be willing to pay £1 per month for the service and if they reduced the fees, more people would chip in, making it better for everyone. If a content creator si good, they get paid other ways, directly by the appreciating viewers. I am not willing to pay for something that I got suggested and it is crap overall when I start watching it. Too much crap on Youtube, AI generated content, lies, deception, crap crap crap. Senseless content gets more attention than quality content. Clickbaits, mass generated content with factual errors. Annoying. I can also go back to books. Sorted.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1