Youtube comments of D. von N. (@D.von.N).

  1. 661
  2. 593
  3. 377
  4. 364
  5. 280
  6. 235
  7. 201
  8. 194
  9. 185
  10. 124
  11. 119
  12. 114
  13. 103
  14. 100
  15. 97
  16. 96
  17. 88
  18. 81
  19. 75
  20. 71
  21. 69
  22. 68
  23. 66
  24. 66
  25. 65
  26. 65
  27. 60
  28. 52
  29. 52
  30. 52
  31. 51
  32. 49
  33. 47
  34. 47
  35. 46
  36. 42
  37. 42
  38. 41
  39. 39
  40. 38
  41. 38
  42. 38
  43. 36
  44. 36
  45. 35
  46. 33
  47. 33
  48. 32
  49. 32
  50. 31
  51. 29
  52. 29
  53. 29
  54. 29
  55. 27
  56. 27
  57. 27
  58. 27
  59. 26
  60. 26
  61. 25
  62. 25
  63. 25
  64. 24
  65. 24
  66. 24
  67. 24
  68. 23
  69. 23
  70. 23
  71. 23
  72. 23
  73. 22
  74. 22
  75. 22
  76. 22
  77. 21
  78. 21
  79. 21
  80. 21
  81. 20
  82. 20
  83. 20
  84. 19
  85. 19
  86. 19
  87. 19
  88. 19
  89. 19
  90. 18
  91. 18
  92. 18
  93. 18
  94. 18
  95. 17
  96. 17
  97. 17
  98. 17
  99. 17
  100. 17
  101. 17
  102. 17
  103. 17
  104. 16
  105. 16
  106. 16
  107. 16
  108. 16
  109. 16
  110. 15
  111. 15
  112. 15
  113. 15
  114. 15
  115. 15
  116. 14
  117. 14
  118. 14
  119. 14
  120. 14
  121. 14
  122. 14
  123. 14
  124. 14
  125. 14
  126. 14
  127. 14
  128. 13
  129. 13
  130. 13
  131. 13
  132. 13
  133. 13
  134. 13
  135. 13
  136. 13
  137. 13
  138. 12
  139. 12
  140. 12
  141. 12
  142. 12
  143. 12
  144. 12
  145. 12
  146. 12
  147. 12
  148. 12
  149. 12
  150. 12
  151. 11
  152. 11
  153. 11
  154. 11
  155. 11
  156. 11
  157. 11
  158. 11
  159. 11
  160. 10
  161. 10
  162. 10
  163. 10
  164. 10
  165. 10
  166. 10
  167. 10
  168. 10
  169. 10
  170. 10
  171. 10
  172. 10
  173. 10
  174. 10
  175. 9
  176. 9
  177. 9
  178. 9
  179. 9
  180. 9
  181. 9
  182. 9
  183. 9
  184. 9
  185. 9
  186. 9
  187. 9
  188. 9
  189. 9
  190. 9
  191. 9
  192. 9
  193. 9
  194. 9
  195. 9
  196. 8
  197. 8
  198. 8
  199. 8
  200. 8
  201. 8
  202. 8
  203. 8
  204. 8
  205. 8
  206. 8
  207. 8
  208. 8
  209. 8
  210. 8
  211. 8
  212. 8
  213. 8
  214. 8
  215. 8
  216. 8
  217. 8
  218. 8
  219. 8
  220. 8
  221. 8
  222. 8
  223. 8
  224. 8
  225. 8
  226. 8
  227. 8
  228. 8
  229. 7
  230. 7
  231. 7
  232. 7
  233. 7
  234. 7
  235. 7
  236. 7
  237. 7
  238. 7
  239. 7
  240. 7
  241. 7
  242. 7
  243. 7
  244. 7
  245. 7
  246. 7
  247. 7
  248. 7
  249. 7
  250. 7
  251. 7
  252. 7
  253. 7
  254. 7
  255. 7
  256. 7
  257. 7
  258. 7
  259. 7
  260. 7
  261. 7
  262. 7
  263. 7
  264. 7
  265. 7
  266. 7
  267. 7
  268. 7
  269. 7
  270. 7
  271. 7
  272. 7
  273. 7
  274. 7
  275. 6
  276. 6
  277. 6
  278. 6
  279. 6
  280. 6
  281. 6
  282. 6
  283. 6
  284. 6
  285. 6
  286. 6
  287. 6
  288. 6
  289. 6
  290. 6
  291. 6
  292. 6
  293. 6
  294. 6
  295. 6
  296. 6
  297. 6
  298. 6
  299. 6
  300. 6
  301. 6
  302. 6
  303. 6
  304. 6
  305. 6
  306. 6
  307. 6
  308. 6
  309. 6
  310. 6
  311. 6
  312. 6
  313. 6
  314. 6
  315. 6
  316. 6
  317. 6
  318. 6
  319. 6
  320. 6
  321. 6
  322. 6
  323. 6
  324. Thanks for explaining us the background. I also wondered how they can do it so cheap, and thought there was some extra contract on bulk shipping. Sometimes two or three separate small orders arrive in one bag as one item (more of a letter size and thickness items), wrapped individually inside as they left the production and would otherwise arrive individually anyway. I don't know who does this grouping, but at least THIS saves extra work to our postal services. It has a sticker label with Chinese on it so I guess it happens on their side of the ocean. I have been and will keep purchasing from China though. It is mostly items for creative activities, not a mere consumerism of trainiers or clothing or other pointless gadgets ending up in the landfill in no time, which I do NOT buy there. I wear proper leather and other branded shoes bought here which last me for years and years and are kind to my body, and returns if not fitting are easy and pain free. I generally buy directly from China stuff I cannot find here, or that I can is extremely overpriced for what it is. I don't mind paying for postage some reasonable fee and I rarely get any free postage from them (Aliexpress exclusively, I haven't tried other platforms and I don't intend to). I only get a free postage when making an order of a certain volume/cost, or the items I look for and find with a free postage have already this price included in the item price. An item worth of 75p came with £2.80 postage charge (plus VAT) or other seller offered it for £3.70 straight. One way or another. By avoiding a middle man I not only save, but often avoid subsidising another unscrupulous business like Amazon. Or items listed on e-bay still coming directly from China regardless, as someone mentined already, just me paying fees to the platforms on top of it. Why should I? They already get enough profit and their practices aren't entirely to be proud of, especially Amazon. I am also selling on e-bay and the policy often comes as cost prohibitive, I don't bother selling certain items at all or I would only earn pennies of profit for individual items I want to get rid of. I do shop locally though, wherever I can get what I need for a reasonable price. For electronics we go for reputable sellers like Currys, expecting the items to be genuine and in working order, with a proper warranty, withouth safety risks like exploding cheap chargers. So it isn't that I only hunt cheap items on the Asian market. Others complained that if the purchase goes wrong they don't get a satisfactory solution anymore. I am yet to have this experience. I always got a refund for a faulty or missing item on Aliexpress, with supplying a photo evidence. And they are obviously aware about extortionate return charges because they also offer simply a refund without returning the item. I have always got it so far. When that changes I will reconsider my purchasing habits. What you mentioned that we support Chinese govt... we do it regardless, wherever we buy items as those items were already produced there. Most of our stuff we use for this or that were produced in China. There is no escape from it. The only downfall is this subsidising of delivery service, which needs sorting out if it is such a big issue, I don't know the real scale within the entire business volume. But that is OUR problem to fix, not theirs (Chinese).
    6
  325. 6
  326. 6
  327. 6
  328. 6
  329. 6
  330. 5
  331. 5
  332. 5
  333. 5
  334. 5
  335. 5
  336. 5
  337. 5
  338. 5
  339. 5
  340. 5
  341. 5
  342. 5
  343. 5
  344. 5
  345. 5
  346. 5
  347. 5
  348. 5
  349. 5
  350. 5
  351. 5
  352. 5
  353. 5
  354. 5
  355. 5
  356. 5
  357. 5
  358. 5
  359. 5
  360. 5
  361. 5
  362. 5
  363. 5
  364. 5
  365. 5
  366. 5
  367. 5
  368. 5
  369. 5
  370. 5
  371. 5
  372. 5
  373. 5
  374. 5
  375. 5
  376. 5
  377. 5
  378. 5
  379. 5
  380. 5
  381. 5
  382. 5
  383. 5
  384. 5
  385. 5
  386. 5
  387. 5
  388. 5
  389. 5
  390. 5
  391. 5
  392. 5
  393. 5
  394. 5
  395. 5
  396. 5
  397. 5
  398. 5
  399. 5
  400. 4
  401. 4
  402. 4
  403. 4
  404. 4
  405. 4
  406. 4
  407. 4
  408. 4
  409. 4
  410. 4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413. 4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. 4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. 4
  426. 4
  427. 4
  428. 4
  429. 4
  430. 4
  431. 4
  432. 4
  433. 4
  434. 4
  435. 4
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439. 4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481. 4
  482. 4
  483. 4
  484. 4
  485. 4
  486. 4
  487. 4
  488. 4
  489. 4
  490. 4
  491. 4
  492. 4
  493. 4
  494. 4
  495. 4
  496. 4
  497. 4
  498. 4
  499. 4
  500. 4
  501. 4
  502. 4
  503. 4
  504. 4
  505. 4
  506. 4
  507. 4
  508. 4
  509. 3
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. 3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. 3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. 3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628. 3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. 3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636. 3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. 3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 3
  658. 3
  659. 3
  660. 3
  661. 3
  662. 3
  663. 3
  664. 3
  665. 3
  666. 3
  667. 3
  668. 3
  669. 3
  670. 3
  671. 3
  672. 3
  673. 3
  674. 3
  675. 3
  676. 3
  677. 3
  678. 3
  679. 3
  680. 3
  681. 3
  682. 3
  683. 3
  684. 3
  685. 3
  686. 3
  687. 3
  688. 3
  689. 3
  690. 3
  691. 3
  692. 3
  693. 3
  694. 3
  695. 3
  696. 3
  697. 3
  698. 3
  699. 3
  700. 3
  701. 3
  702. 3
  703. 3
  704. 3
  705. 3
  706. 3
  707. I don't know how defamation laws are formulated in the terror land, but those in our sane world, when it comes to the celebrity at least (the rules are a bit different with celebrities), there are two major conditions that need to be met for the defamation lawsuit to have a success: The seemingly defamatory statement needs to come from somebody wanting to harm the accuser, i.e. cannot prove a greater good like protecting the society from the accuser, and 2. the defendant knew that what they said about the accuser (initiating this defamation lawsuit), was 'substantially untrue'. Someone tried to lecture me about a potential of defamation lawsuit from Russel Brand, for calling him a sexual offender under a youtube video. I said it based on a 4 years meticulous investigation and careful consideration of evidence, containing independent evidence from institutions and verified messages between him and one of his victims. It took me just a few minutes to find out he couldn't get far with such a case. His behaviour and personal statements of other people he dealt with for years and years are out there, on record. He would have to accuse of defamation them first. Jeremy Vine, on the other hand, won a small case when somebody pulled his name out of their rear when the name of the 'BBC presenter' paying a 'teenager' for nude pics wasn't officially announced yet. And I still think Simonyan was told to say this, to see how the public will react. They are getting very desperate there to sell to public the reasons why their economy is crashing and why they have no freedom of speech, or why western technologies are hard to get nowadays. This is RuSSian propaganda (and perhaps any propaganda): give out conflicting messages and watch what sticks. Also, when people don't know what to believe anymore, they become apathetic. And Kremlin doesn't need anything more from his populace than them not caring about what Kremlin does. Eat your bread and shut up.
    3
  708. 2
  709. Very good content here and I too noticed Sabina's rants a bit too much. But she has some truth, too. Academia seems to be breaking apart. They compete for grants and quantity of papers seem to take over quality. Misrepresenting significance of results, like when regular consumption of processed meat is associated with 10% increase in diabetes. And it makes headlines in many tabloids and other press. If your risk was 30%, this association makes it 33%. Is it really that significant when excess calories and sedentary lifestyle are a driving factor? I see a grain industry fuelling this agenda, similarly when aspartame is demonised by sugar lobby in relation to cancer, using evasive vocabulary, like 'human equivalent' studied in rats. A TV channel which aired this session, with the researcher in Italy, didn't specify what amount that equivalent was, but they made a conclusion. I found that research. It was 5 litres of diet coke for a 70kg person, consumed every day of their adult life. 10% of those rats got cancer without getting aspartame, 20% got with the mentioned dose proportional to their bodies and 30% developed cancer after equivalent of 12 litres of daily consumption throughout their adult lives. Crooky science driven by corrupt attitudes, just to get attention and more funding. The result is more diabetes and obesity because lay people get scared of the compound and reverse back to sugar, like our kitchen lady. No argument will convince her that the diet coke is better for her corpulent ageing body, over the sugary one.
    2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. Right, at least you acknowledge your own role in all this, the indifference in action, although there was some difference in thinking. Thinking (praying) doesn't change things, actions do. You know, between the lines, when saying that Putin is elected - at least on paper - that it is all just circus. He engineered the society and you also said in the past there was this contract: don't be interested in politics and your life will be OK. People went on with it, you did too. Why blaming them now? For years and years the opposition was eliminated, little by little. Frog cooked, you know it. And most Russians didn't have the privilege of living abroad and getting a different perspective on things. You had that privilege and yet you did nothing. So why blaming average Russians from not doing better than you? Even after the invasion, all you did was to spread the word to the western audience, carefully selecting words so the FSB didn't knock on your door. In RuSSia now there is a factor of self-preservation. Instinct for survival. Not everyone in RuSSia has the capacity to move abroad and start a new life there like you do. Their only option is to survive. And life in prison is bad (let alone the torture, political prisoners are treated extra badly). Things won't change as easily when everybody expects someone else hurting their wellbeing and going to the streets. You didn't, you fled. People got arrested for just peacefully standing there and holding a blank piece of paper. The society has been engineered not to win over the system. Now it is too late. Things will need to get very very VERY bad to turn into better.
    2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. One thing I would like to point out: this war started back in 2014. Where were those good Russians then? Lived their lives like if nothing happened because the sanctions were lukewarm. Only when it affected them more, they suddenly decided to flee.. also not to get conscripted. Until then all was like normal in RuSSia. Those who left back then in disagreement would have some of my respect. My other point is that risking life to trying to beat a murderous and autocratic regime now, when it removed all possible ways of resistance and build a strong counterforce to curb every single protest in the nib, is difficult. With years lasting propaganda, too large part of the society is complicit in this situation. It isn't easy to persuade your grandma or even mother to the facts when all they know is the official propaganda that feeds into their silly pride (they are as proud Russians as you are a proud Ukrainian). They are proud to be aggressive, because they got convinced this is necessary for them to survive. Try to convince them otherwise! Russian family didn't believe their own Ukrainian member when she informed them how it really was. They were just parroting the state propaganda how Ukrainians are nazis and she shoud stick with Russia. Cognitive dissonance? Maybe. Or maybe just being dumb. A few hundreds or thousands youngsters on the ploshchadj (I learned some Russian years ago) would very soon be pushed back and punished, leading to nothing much. Many know that and they rather flee. I wouldn't want to be a Russian nowadays. You cannot please either camp, whether by leaving or staying and ending up in prison, tortured or even killed. At least they took their knowledge and expertise elsewhere, benefiting their new home country, some will never go back to Russia. Many analysts agree that this war will end when Putler is defeated militarily. Nothing else will bring this regime down, it has esteblished too powerful position already.
    2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. A lot of atrocities have been happening in the past. There is no doubt about that. This video is rather lengthy and packed with numbers and claims, so I comment as I watch. I have nothing against Israel as such. A certain consensus was reached years ago and borders were given. If only Israel didn't keep expanding illegally... It would have had a clear record and everybody would stand with Israel today. But many in their sane minds cannot. You cannot hurt others and then demand understanding when you get the push back. Listing how many Jews lived in Muslim countries and how many are there now... many have moved from even peaceful regions elsewhere to Israel, even if they were born elsewhere - into the illegal settlements. The problem isn't the Jewishness, it is the Zionism - at all cost. The current Israeli government is recognised as far-right and you alone don't agree with it. There are Israelis that want to kill Palestinians and there are Palestinians that want to kill Israelis. The hate is mutual. The difference is how much each of them can defend themselves from the attack from outside. Palestinians clearly pull for a shorter lead. And probably most of them don't even support Hamas. They are now being beaten from both sides: Israel and Hamas. This isn't fair to those people, many of which already lost everything, some repeatedly, also due to Israeli illegal expansion. The current Israeli steps look like a genocide on Palestinians. They are in a prison, they cannot escape, Egypt doesn't want them, yet they are told to evacuate in 24 hours or die, Israel starting from the North. How are you supposed to evacuate disabled or elderly when you have little or no enery or fuel left? And evacuate where? Into rubble Israel keeps turning buildings into? Even hospitals, claiming it is a breeding ground for terrorists... RuSSians also kept bombarding civilian objects indiscriminately (and targetting them), claiming they only target military objects. We know where the truth is. Legal defence doesn't include knowingly killing defenceless civilians.
    2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. Oh my. I was soooo looking forward watching this and expecting you would put things into the right perspective after I have seen people using the Pfizer report as a conspiracy. How wrong I was! Once again. Watching about 15 minutes and I am not happy with the lack of honesty in this video. You correctly said: AE ASSOCIATED with vaccines, not caused by vaccines. General folks don't know the difference. You should have explained it at the beginning because I know you know the difference. Why suddenly leaving it out??? And that is all. Even if a number of effects were clinically/medically proven, it means just that: clinically/medically proven vs self reported. Still not confirmed they happened as a direct result of the vaccine or they followed the vaccination and could have been coincidental. They explain it in the report you read from. Why didn't you say it at the beginning but present it as some conspiration to deprive public of relevant data? And this all while the covid was still rampant and many of those side effects were more likely from the infection itself than from the vaccine. And even if we don't know the numbers of overall vaccinated people for this number of AE the document also explains they cannot estimate the level of underreporting of AEs, so even these figures aren't a true reflection of AE post vaccinations. This report is just a parallel to the Yellow card scheme where people report anything they associate with the vaccine they received - with a specific focus to the Pfizer. I have seen enough antivaxxers presenting the numbers from Yellow card as true side effects from the vaccines. You are adding to them with this video. You know too well that no medical intervention is without a risk and that there is no medication without side effects. The rate of side effects (proved ones, not associated) to the rate of administration is the key. There is a line where we consider something safe, with a low rate of side effects. Dozens thousands volunteers took part in safety trials. If there was some significant threat from the vaccine (a proved causal effect, not these associations) they wouldn't roll it out. Sometimes not disclosing irrelevant data for mainstream folks, who don't know what to do with the data (it is apparent here!) and freak out needlessly, is justified. You try to appear as bringing a balanced view, but from these first 15 minutes and the tone how you doubt the context (explained in the report but you leaving it out) only confuses people who don't know better, seeing you as a god, feeding them this biased view and confirming their unjustified fear from vaccines. How many of your followers will actually go to read the report and know how to interpret what is in front of them? You have some responsibility here, Doctor! And at the end, the long list of conditions... one of them was an Amniotic cavity infection... just another condition recorded after the vaccination but it is unlikely it was caused by the Pfizer vaccine, right? Ammonia abnormal; Ammonia increased... seriously? One in 5 (maybe more now) in the western world has excess fat in their liver, due to a lifestyle. Long list of conditions of special interest but again - not necessarily caused by the vaccine itself. But waaau, you are amazed by an impressively long list of conditions which were not necessarily caused by the vaccine itself. Did you actually look into them and see what they may mean in the real world? Apparently not, that would not give an ever growing list of confused followers. From the same document (p5): "Pfizer’s safety database contains cases of AEs reported spontaneously to Pfizer, cases reported by the health authorities, cases published in the medical literature, cases from Pfizer-sponsored marketing programs, non-interventional studies, and cases of serious AEs reported from clinical studies regardless of causality assessment."
    2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. The antidote is 'mindful eating'. And that not only focusing on the meal/food at the time of eating, but also the feeling afterwards, how it makes us feel half an hour, an hour, or two after eating. And choosing the better option next time. This way I have learned to avoid most of those traps on the supermarket shelves and turned a blind eye to the countless new products that are thrown on the market, including the overwhelming variety of cereals. I have 2 or three I keep buying, one of them is plain oats, making my own delish porridge at home, adding sunflower seeds, a bit of honey, pinch of salt, raisins and pouring this cooked mix in milk into a bowl with a handful of frozen cherries. The hot porridge will be cooled faster and cherries weren't exposed to excess heat for too long to lose nutrients. Coffee with milk only comes with it and I have a weekend breakfast like no other. Tuna pasta bake sauce with adding pasta, tuna and cheese on top? Not enough for me. I also add steamed broccoli and cherry tomatoes mid way into baking, making it a nutritious superbomb what would otherwise be just junk. Sometimes I swap the tuna with chicken breasts. I get a praise for it every time at the family table. No pudding needed, the meal was satisfying enough, combining all those flavours and textures we love. People need to take responsibility for their stomachs and bodies - eventually translating into happier minds, too. A lot of anxiety and feeling low could be fixed with proper eating.
    1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. Looks like youtube is using this grey area and the lack of clarification in the law for their own benefit. But they could as easily add to their cookie policy this little detail, that they will run a script to check for ad-blockers and if the users don't agree with it, they are free to exit youtube. It is a private platform and it is free to set its rules, within law, of course. There is a very easy way out of it. I am no lawyer, but I have saved myself a few bucks by looking into the fine print and T&Cs and found some holes that I could throw into the face of those who wanted to rip me off, Sky broadband including. Someone with a lot of knowledge, money and time could take Youtube to the court and at the end we shall see on whose side the court would lean. So far chat GPT said this: "The ePrivacy Directive, which is currently being revised as the ePrivacy Regulation, addresses privacy and confidentiality issues in the electronic communications sector. The new regulation is expected to strengthen privacy rules for electronic communications and may have implications for the use of tracking technologies, including scripts to detect ad-blockers. It's important to note that legal interpretations may change, and new regulations may have been introduced since my last update. Therefore, it's advisable to check for the latest legal developments and consult legal professionals or official sources for the most up-to-date information on this matter." Otherwise Chat GPT confirms, the use of script for monitoring adblock isn't clearly defined. So the title of this video might need to change, at least to make it a question.
    1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 2 and half minutes into this and I see omissions in the info. #1 Palestinians (Arabs rather, because Palestine was home to Arabs in 90% and Jews in 8%) weren't pushed away in 1948, or shall I rather say: this genocide didn't start in 1948. It was going on for like two decades prior. West funded Zionists were killing entire Arab families and villages to make room for Jews/Zionists. #2 This conflict goes back to late 1800s and started with Christian Zionism in British parliament, and partly antisemitic Zionism. While some Jews dreamed about Israel as their solely Jewish country, other Jews in Europe disagreed and wanted the society to stop being antisemitic, not that they had to move elsewhere to please antisemites. This is a project of the West, which brings me to the #3 omission: the western influence in the Middle East. While we stood firmly behind Ukraine when an aggressor aimed to steal their land, the West was willfully complicit in Zionists and Israel doing the same to Arabs in Palestine, up to the point they want to erase Palestine from the map and try to deny the past. I was diappointed to hear Ben Hodges parroting the propaganda that Israel has the right to defend itself, completely ignoring the past and even present, when Israelis still keep intimidating Palestinians in their homes at night, just a couple weeks ago they uprooted some 2000 olive and other fruit trees, sprayed herbidices on other saplings... this is terror with the support of West while we are being told that Israelis have the right to defend themselves. I'll keep watching, maybe some of what I wrote here will be mentioned.
    1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. Left out speed of doing things. Windows is bloated with a lot of telemetry and other bloatware nobody asked for. I had to remove xbox, cortana and other stuff, and I noticed you also don't have them installed, or at least showing in the start menu. I never had Adobe photoshop and only used GIMP, on Windows and Linux as well. Just basic things, nothing advanced. I remember how it took a long while to launch it in Windows, but recently I used it in my Linux (started working with Linux just last year and still learning), and to my absolute shock, Gimp was ready to work with in exactly 1 second! O.N.E. S.E.C.O.N.D. It blew my mind. Booting and shutting down Linux is also faster, everything is faster. Even opening a Word document in Windows takes ages if I haven't done it for a while. In Linux it is like a ping, right there. Another thing with Linux is, based on my so far limited experience: if you switch off something or uninstall, next major update will not put it there for you again. Recently I noticed copilot appeared in my task bar out of nowhere, after an update, despite I hid it before. I don't think I need to worry about this in Linux. In Linux you own your system, the system doesn't own you, like in Windows. And even that licence might be a thing of the past soon, if it isn't yet. They don't need your pitiful little money for the OEM licence. They just want you to use this adware and spyware for dog's sake. Just use it, don't pay us money, pay us with data. And here is another software you might like, install it. Please, user, install the stuff we want you to have! Also Edge, have you heard about Edge? Every few days I had a pop up in the bottom right corner even in the Win10 installation. It also started suddenly, without me asking for it. Constant interruptions with offers. For me Linux is different but also better, if you don't rely on particular software not existing for Linux. But it isn't a Linux's problem. It is a problem of the developers not willing to expand on this niche market.
    1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. Earlier this year I also thought I won't switch to Linux. Never worked with it, myself in later 40s, no IT education... but the shenanigans of Microsoft made me to give it a go and I see my future on Linux. You are right that one of the factors why Microsoft is almost a monopoly is that it is one monolithic system. It is almost the same for everyone. The other reason I realised is (and many noticed it too) is that the vast majority of computers come with Windows, smaller minority are on Mac. Is there any other option for people? I don't see it, if not counting mobile devices and Androids, or Chrome book at most. Microsoft is almost a monopoly on the market and people never knew anything else so they go with what is available to them on the market. And for doing my work I had to reach to Ubuntu 20, as it is the latest Linux distro that has a client for Oracle remote access. Or some earlier Linux distro. Not the later ones either. And Ubuntu is half way from Linux to Microsoft, when it comes to proprietary software. There are other Windows users that depend on Microsoft, like for Teams, or complicate the system via emulation or Wine and Bottles, and that probably comes with other security risks. And although I will most likely go Linux as my main system next year after Win10 loses support, I will also run Win11 from a usb for those cases I need Windows. I hope the Linux community will make even greater effort to make Windows users to switch with a greater confidence in the future.
    1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. To be more precise: the Earth is not the hottest it has ever been. We are. We haven't lived in those extreme conditions and by watching what is happening due to climate change now, we probably wouldn't survive it again on this population level. There would probably be a major reset to the civilisation. We have done too much damage to the balance in the ecosystem, including massive rainforest destruction, building mega cities covered with concrete and creating pockets of hot air that has impact on jet stream in the North. Permafrost is thawing and releasing carbon not only from a dozen thousands years old deposits, but also from the ancient deposits from millions years ago. This methane is unstoppable and there is a lot of it, far more than is in the atmosphere currently. And I see it pretty bleak regarding a unified governments effort globally, as each watches their own interests. Take just the gas and oil RuSSia cannot sell and let it burn instead. Closing the well would mean they won't be able to open it again and drill another one is expensive. So they shut it only when absolutely necessary. China increased coal use, Germans did too, freaking out over nuclear energy and now they want to fix the Nord stream 2, expecting more RuSSian gas pouring in in the future... Too often an electric car is charged via a gasoline generator and mining lithium also has its carbon footprint. And what about those millions battery powered scooters and cars produced in China, paid by the govt in subsidies and then parked in the fields, let to rot? Sometimes they catch fire and try to put off the lithium battery, especially if it ignites several other vehicles nearby... Hold your hats, folks, we are in for a rollercoaster ride.
    1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. I was once one leg in a pyramid scheme, I lost a bit of money in their benefit (not the whole volume they wanted from me) and I have learned a lesson. I remember that herd mentality on one of those meetings, how it made me clap and 'celebrate' I was with them, but inside me there were doubts breweing already... Of course later on I found out who they were and that they got more people from my area. I tried to get my neighbour into it, before I knew fully what it was about, but luckily they didn't jump on the bandwagon. More recently, several years back, I was out of the university, so well versed in the subject, when I got approached (or me answering an advert) by an MLM company. I sort of subscribed to it, their method was a bit different, not as investment heavy, so a safer bet for me. I appreciated their product and I still believe it is a good product. It doesn't have those blackmailing and enforcement tactics, but it is an MLM nonetheless. I no longer promote their products, I have a few kilos of fliers I made on my own expense and never got anything out of it and that will go to the recycling very soon. I am out of it, never fell into exaggerating the effect of the product to naive people, never had a stall or party presenting the product. I mostly took advantage of having the product at discount and sold a few, not really covering my expenses with this 'business'. I think the product is good, just overpriced and not allowed to be sold on e-bay or similar, to get audience. You need to do the usual leg work to sell it. And being vague on social media to lure customers and other distributors in. Not my style. I am out.
    1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. Dear Dr Campbell, I watched your previous video of you criticising the BBC article when it was freshly out. Some points were good, others less so in my view. I am not sure (don't remember) whether you did it but if not I would firstly contact the authors of that 'debunked' reporting and ask them where those 27 or so studies were instead of going on the air and saying I cannot find them. I didn't react then, but I am doing it now because to me it looks that it is becoming a worthless and ridiculous battle for nothing. You treated the newspaper article as a medical journal with proper referencing, and, obviously, it didn't stand to that high standard. I read that article weeks/months ahead and I read it again then, and there was much more into it, in a context. And it wasn't the student who wrote that article on BBC, the student just spotted something and looked into it further from which this all evolved. Just because the person was a student (I heard a hint of dismissal in your voice then when you said it) that does not make him incapable of finding errors or challenging things. History showed us that some students are way smarter and capable of great discoveries. And finally: different people will take different things from any presentation and that has been happening with those 17k deaths, used as a red herring among covid deniers. For me it wasn't such a huge or great or big or significant story to publish, just meat stripped off a bone (waving with the bone around) and even you agree that looking at excess deaths is the best way to check the covid effect on the society. Now even BBC, with Omicron replacing Delta, added to their daily reporting of deaths within 28 days of positive testing, that some people may have died of different causes. They weren't saying it before. The modelling of deaths statistics designed for earlier and deadlier strains is no longer fit, but currently we don't have an updated method (not sure whether it will come at all). I find BBC pretty transparent overall and a great service for educating public (who want to be educated). Unless BBC, or anyone out there, reports a total nonsense I find this as nit-picking that might backfire many ways and a brief search shows it already did. Less is more sometimes, I mean, you don't need to come with something, anything, every day. Saying all that, I find you as a valuable source of information and opportunities for others to share their stories the official medicine does not seem to want to hear. Keep doing a good job and don't fall into a rabbit hole of pointless arguments over peanuts and cheap sensationalism. Once the covid as we know it will be over. Maybe slowing down is the right thing. Or switch to another topic. People will be listening.
    1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305.  @РазрывШаблонов-е6щ  "The Russian population is unarmed. The laws are written to us by the Americans, isn't it under their dictation that Putin destroyed industry and the army for 30 years? " That is news to me... does he still have nukes though? Those were the most important to get rid of... he didn't. Ukraine gave them up in exchange for the sovereignty and protected borders. What happened in 2014??? Russian population is unarmed, poor, easily fooled with baseless pride, dying from simple infections and from AIDS, alcoholism, drugs abuse (poverty is a bitch) and now brainwashed from state controlled media with no alternative views allowed. Putin did this to Russians all by himself and the poor Russians let him do it, because corruption is so rampant that by the old Soviet rule if you don't steal, you are stealing from your family. And yet, still nothing is missing anywhere... What killed Russian army is corruption. Sending those troops to fight in Ukraine with years expired rations that they got poisoned with botulism. Jesus Christ! Sending the oblivious soldiers to dig themselves in Chernobyl, just to return back with the radiations sickness... they never heard about the Chernobyl disaster! In Russia lives are dispensable. And Russia is too big to be managed by one man in peace. It hasn't been created by peace in the first place. RuSSia has been rotting from inside for years (because of the corruption and money accumulated in hands of a few super rich elite, Putin himself on the top taking half for himself) and he thought he would gain fresh 44 million souls by just taking over the whole Ukraine. He miscalculated it totally. And you only can have a true democracy when you have transparency. There is no transparency in RuSSia. Even the 'random' military inspections weren't really random. All was prepared for a show in advance and propped to look like on the paper. Everything is OK, nothing is missing... but nothing is there as it should be... West has nothing to do with this. It is the ancient RuSSian mentality they don't want to give up.
    1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. I have a good relationship with a bot, and I often ask it for assistance, since google is becoming a minefield for irrelevant content, so hear hear: The high incidence of stomach cancer in Japan has been a well-documented phenomenon, and various factors contribute to this elevated risk. While the exact reasons are complex and multifactorial, several key factors have been identified: Dietary Factors: Salted and Pickled Foods: Traditional Japanese diets include a variety of salted and pickled foods, which can contribute to a high-salt intake. Excessive salt consumption is associated with an increased risk of stomach cancer. High Consumption of Soy Sauce: Soy sauce, a common condiment in Japanese cuisine, is also high in salt, and frequent consumption may contribute to the elevated risk. Infection with Helicobacter pylori: Infection with Helicobacter pylori, a bacterium that can infect the stomach lining, is a major risk factor for stomach cancer. In Japan, a significant portion of the population carries H. pylori, contributing to the high incidence. Tobacco Smoking: Smoking tobacco is a well-established risk factor for stomach cancer. Historically, smoking rates in Japan have been relatively high, contributing to the elevated risk. Genetic Factors: Some studies suggest that genetic factors may play a role in the higher incidence of stomach cancer in certain populations, including the Japanese. Specific genetic variations may influence susceptibility to the disease. Environmental Factors: Environmental factors, including exposure to certain occupational hazards or pollutants, may contribute to the risk of stomach cancer. Historical Factors: Historical factors, such as food preservation and dietary habits, have played a role. Traditional preservation methods like pickling and salting were historically important for food storage in Japan but may contribute to the elevated risk of stomach cancer.  @allo-other 
    1
  2355. This is your lucky day, regarding HFCS and obesity. I looked into it about a decade ago, raw data from USDA and other countries, too. What correlated with obesity was more oils and fats (fries and pastries, doner kebab) than HFCS, which basically replaced cane sugar and plateaued around 2010, not going up as much, but fats did and so did the obesity. Also starchy foods, that are particularly delicious when soaked with fat. Exercise, from my point of view has at least two benefits as opposing to sedentary lifestyle: moving around moves your lymphatic fluids, lymphatic system responsible for preventing diseases. Secondary: exercise triggers production of our own antioxidant glutathione, fighting oxidative stress, also contributing to cancers if in excess. The bot suggests other mechanisms, one partly linked to the glutathione, not surprisingly: Reduced Inflammation: Regular physical activity has anti-inflammatory effects on the body. Chronic inflammation is associated with an increased risk of cancer, and exercise may help mitigate this risk by reducing inflammation. Improved Immune Function: Exercise has been shown to enhance the function of the immune system. A robust immune system is better equipped to identify and eliminate potentially cancerous cells, reducing the likelihood of cancer development. (that is the lymphatic system, not having its own propulsion mechanism like heart and arterial muscles). Balanced Hormone Levels: Physical activity can influence the levels of hormones in the body. Hormones such as estrogen and insulin have been linked to the development of certain cancers. Exercise may help regulate hormone levels, reducing the risk of hormone-related cancers. Enhanced DNA Repair: Exercise has been shown to enhance the body's ability to repair DNA damage. DNA damage can lead to mutations and the development of cancerous cells. Regular physical activity supports DNA repair mechanisms. Improved Insulin Sensitivity: Exercise can enhance insulin sensitivity, which helps regulate blood sugar levels. Chronic high levels of insulin, as seen in insulin resistance, may contribute to the development of certain cancers. Regular exercise can help maintain healthy insulin levels. (although not sure it is the insulin's fault or rather the elevated oxidative glucose one). Maintenance of Healthy Body Weight: Obesity is a known risk factor for several types of cancer. Regular physical activity contributes to weight management and helps prevent obesity, reducing the risk of obesity-related cancers. Enhanced Gut Microbiota: Exercise has been linked to a positive impact on the gut microbiota. A healthy gut microbiome is associated with a reduced risk of certain cancers and overall improved health. Promotion of Apoptosis (Cell Death): Exercise may stimulate the process of apoptosis, which is programmed cell death. This is a natural mechanism that eliminates damaged or potentially cancerous cells from the body. hope it helps. Links are quite elaborative to go through, I became lazy and consult the bot when the topic is heavy and then decide whether I am satisfied. :)  @allo-other 
    1
  2356. Another complex answer is needed. You partly answered it yourself: unprocessed. Not only people were more active in the past (an average Newyorker man a century ago had intake of 4-5000kcal daily and remained slim) but their diet wasn't as processed and designed to make them eat more, delaying satiety. The deadly combo of fast food is sugar, fat and salt together. It completely overtakes our brain signalling, deprived of fiber it fills our stomach less so we pack more into it. There is no magic in it: energy in vs energy out, really. Just the metabolism of different foods has different consequences. Only recently I learned that consuming pulses regulated blood sugar better even the next day after consumption when comparing two groups of people eating just white bread. Those eating beans or lentils the previous day had more stable glucose even the following day. With stable glucose you don't suffer such hunger pangs and stuffing your face with junk like if there was no tomorrow. Eskimos are a different beast though. They have adapted to a high fat diet, so they aren't the same as the rest of the world. One size doesn't fit all, neither does diet. And yes, industries have politicians in the pocket, so whichever gives a higher bribe, wins. Just on the label everyone talked about low fat, but in reality fry shops were booming. But yes, fat also has a satiating effect, like whole milk vs skim milk, which is a scam, once fed to pigs as waste after butter production. But overdoing fat isn't good either. I am an omnivore and I strive to eat less processed diet, with fruits, vegetables, grains, pulses, potatoes, some meat, eggs, dairy, making my eggs on a knob of butter, Malaysian curry on coconut fat, Indian curry on ghee, but we also have oils, used sesame one on chow mein... haven't been to the fast food for ages and even in Wetherspoon on the airport I had a barley salad with chicken, pumpkin, tomatoes, greens and all the goodness, just some 700 kcal, in contrast to other fried junk that was twice as caloric. And I am not afraid of diet sodas, sugar industry won't scare me with their false claims about aspartame. I looked into that one too. I drink tea or coffee with milk without anything else. And I am a rare occurrence in my family for not having diabetes or any sign of it. And if you excuse me, going to do my treadmill session now :)  @allo-other 
    1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. I am no IT specialist, but I suffered this problem, too, on my Win10. Whatever I tried, nothing helped, and believe me, I tried a lot. I don't remember digging into specific processes too much, but I looked into them and nothing really helped. Only a clean reinstall of the entire system, via the manufacturer's recovery tool fixed the issue. I had problems with not being able to pause the third party antivirus, not being able to back up files on an external hard drive via 'file backup' function, just manually copying them, scannow command repeatedly showed no integrity violations, full scan by the third party (norton) antivirus found nothing wrong (took over 5 hours), DISM repeatedly failed to restore the image (I suspect different versions were there, not quite sure how to fix it), and many other things. Chckdsk ran, fixed, but issues persisted. Crystaldiskinfo suddenly started giving me a warning, for reallocation, but the numbers 100 100 36 meant nothing really wrong, could be false positive. I still kept having mysterious 100% disk here and there, slow boot, slow loading of stuff, among other problems. I did a clean reinstall and all goes fine. After doing that I had an issue with one process (CxAudioSvc) that was supposedly linked with an outdated audio drive, but even updating that drive didn't make the problem go away. So I permanently disabled that process, without any noticeable impact, hearing it was a remnant of a bankrupt company that used it as a trojan at some point, but it still is in the package to reinstall Windows in the modern day. Anyway, I have learned something from this video about the RAM. But that most likely wasn't my issue, as the PC started to function badly half way into me just browsing internet, no extra processes initiated by me. Firstly it worked fast and suddenly it got sluggish. And especially when it wanted me to update Windows... I could do NOTHING without waiting minutes to load a page. That was before I initiated the update, not during update. Something terribly messed up with the system (I suspect Norton, but might be wrong) and a fresh reinstall worked like a charm. And yes, I kept restarting the machine, which sometimes took long, so not just shut down that makes it go into a sleep mode rather. Also that chckdsk applies to non-ssd hard drives, which I have, so obviously it wouldn't work. And defragmentation also shouldn't be done on ssds, which is probably not known, as I have this option on the PC with SSD hard disc from new. Why are they doing it? That probably contributes to the warning by crystaldiskinfo? Have I done some damage to the disc?
    1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. It can be so confusing when people make statements and don't cover everything evey side wants to hear. Suddenly others fill into the not said space their own stuff. What bothers me that there is always a great media coverage when the Palestinian side does something to Israel, but very little is informed when Israel does similar to the Palestinian side. A disproportionally greater number of Palestinians have died than Israeli over the years. AlJazeera has been covering the murder of their correspondent by the Israeli forces for months and months, almost daily. She was born Palestinian and was reporting on injustice the Palestinians were experiencing every day. I have heared nothing much about her killing in our media. She had a PRESS clothing and was shot into her head, twice I think. But when Hamas does something, suddenly everyone has Israeli flag in their profile. This will bother some people pretty much and that doesn't mean they are antisemitic. Hamas is simply hijacking the situation for their cause. But the elephant in the room is that situation over which the average Palestinians have no control, but Israel could do a lot if they wanted. But they don't want to. They are exploiting their importance in the region, take the US tax money and keep pushing the Palestinians more and more. If Israel had stayed within the borders agreed previously, Hamas would probably have no cause or we all would be united in its condemnation otherwise. So until Israel does the right thing and stops in its illegal activities, you will have people voicing their views and many being misunderstood. And we will periodically keep having this conversation over and over again.
    1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. @punkinhoot I am struggling to find more recent median figures for Canada, after 2022, but what the chat bot spat out is this: "Comparing these figures, the annual cost of renting a one-bedroom apartment amounts to approximately $23,076 CAD, which constitutes about 33% of the median after-tax household income. This percentage slightly exceeds the commonly recommended threshold of 30% for housing expenses, indicating that rental affordability remains a concern for many Canadians." And now imagine a person with median income In RuSSia (which is 60,000 Rubble) spends over 80% of their income on this matchbox. If I lived in London, I would be struggling, too. But I moved out 10 years ago, found a job in a more rural area, having a big house, comfortably paying out mortgage. Rents also wouldn't break my neck. I can live with little, being resourceful, cooking mostly at home and taking out coffee in a flask, costing in pennies, not $8 for a Costa cup or so. Things are harder for most people in most parts of the world, also in Australia. But RuSSians are having it extremely tough. Rubble collapsing, exporting far lest than they used to, importing far more than they used to, crashing Rubble means everything costs much more than it used to... Only those are having it good who produce weapons and ammo (not a real economy as they get nothing for it, it is not sold to a customer, it is wasted on destruction of their neighbour), or those sending their son, brother, father, uncle, to the frontlines, suffering unsustainable losses. Those get extra cash, that lasts them for a while if they don't go on a sudden spending spree and waste it all in a few weeks.
    1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. I am lost on this one. What is it about? Taking an illogical sci-fi content and try to prove whether it would work? I have stopped at half way through (lil less than that) and I am giving up. I have been pondering on our travel to other stars for some time to realise we won't be able to do it for several reasons. I am not going to elaborate on that, just saying that the universe is a deadly space, not favouring life and if life occurs, it is despite all odds, because the conditions were right for a long enough period of time. An that is rare. The chance is there are other forms of a complex life out there, but we will never find out and never reach that, for the space's vastness and the physical limitations of us reaching the distance in a lifetime of one man. Even radio waves sent out will disperse into a background noise leaving our location in this arm of galaxy, becoming illegible to anyone who is out there trying to listen, like we have been for decades. Sending a pointed signal to a specific poin in the vast space requires a lot of energy which we don't have and knowing where exactly to point it out... and we don't know that. The further we would have to send the pointed signal, the more energy we would need and more points to consider. I am perfectly happy with the fact we will never meet another advanced civilisation like ours. We are irrelevant to the universe, too. We just give ourselves a much higher purpose than we actually have. So enjoy the day you have, it might be the last for you
    1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. Coming to this unaware how bad things are in S Africa and it starts making sense why the govt is so servile towards Putin. Two alikes. But regarding the privately ran energy companies, we in the UK don't have shortages, but because the private energy producers only watch their profit, an increasing number of people cannot afford to use the amount of energy they need and are going without as a choice. And obviously many have had their health harmed or lost lives last (and previous) winter due to hypothermia, especially the elderly. Poorer households cannot afford to heat enough so they have moulds spreading in their neglected homes and that has a whole range of other consequences, on healthcare, economy due to loss of working hours, etc. So private sector isn't the silver bullet you are trying to promote, but I get the point that when the corrupt govt deprives the nation of their rights, private sector can bring a positive boost. Up to a point. Just remember that the customers are secondary there, the primary interest are shareholders and their profit. And so many public services ran by private industries in the UK neglected the upgrade of networks while paying out £billions in dividents to their own members, all across the world. British customers are subsidising pensions in Australia, for example. Or cheaper energy to France where the state owns the majority of energy supply. Right now we have a big scandal with raw sewage pumped into our rivers and seas, due to neglected upgrade of pipes from Victorian times.
    1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. That salmonella contamination: once in a time it makes headlines and people go crazy. How many times they cross-contaminated their own food production - that doesn't make it to the news. Those factories usually have very strict hygiene standards, especially in the west. They cannot risk damage to their reputation. A number of documentaries were made from inside of factories for educational purposes, broadcasted in the UK (and certainly elsewhere as well), following the production of countless food items from the raw ingredients to the packaging and dispatch. Most households can only dream about such level of hygiene control. That popcorn was a good example, but again, not every country allows these chemicals into their food chain, so one needs to watch this aspect as well. Cereals and biscuits colourings - I mentioned in my previous post, there is a big difference between what the USA allows into their foods and what other parts of the world do. Most of our food colourings in Britain and Europe are natural vegetables or spices pigments, like chlorophyll, beetroot, annatto nothing to be scared of. I would avoid such items produced in the US, that is for sure. I see nothing wrong with the use of tinned tomatoes, tinned kidney beans (even safer than if undercooked at home), frozen peas or fruits I add to my morning cereals (just those fruits, not peas LOL). Fresh blueberries are often attacked by moulds, not so much those from the freezer that were picked and frozen in a few hours.
    1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. I have noticed this crappy stuff, but I have learned to sift through them. If too hyperbolic title or image, I just give it a miss, or straight don't recommend that channel. The same goes for the new phenomenon (at least to me), regarding economy or politics: if the title has a word 'collapse', I don't watch it. Just recently I stopped following one of the Simon (whoever) channels, where he has a whole team preparing the materials for him and he just reads the stuff out loud, not knowing whether somethig is factually correct or not, covering several channels like this, posting something daily. Last time I challenged their claim that Jupiter is pulling Moon from the Earth's orbit and all I got was being slammed by another member in the discussion that what I want from them to provide a perfect content or something? This was just one of very basic errors anyone can get a red light flashing if they are into cosmology at least a little bit, like myself, not a professional. When I learned it was just a mill for audience, without accountability for factual information, I don't watch their content anymore. The trouble with this spam is it is a subliminal manipulation of less educated and knowledgeable people (forming the majority of the world population unfortunately), so they keep believing conspiracy theories and don't want to be brought to reality. They love their fantastic world of being special, having a special knowledge, how governments want to kill us, aka QAnon stuff. This is not just an innocent spam, it can turn dangerous when it grabs enough people to turn over elections into someone like Trump.
    1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1