Comments by "evertvdb000" (@evertvdb000) on "Former DOJ official makes bold prediction on Trump's Big Tech suit" video.

  1. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship, all 60 went nowhere.
    3
  2. My god, you are still whining about a ‘rigged’ election ?? ‘boohoohoo ! I don’t like it when trump loses… boohoohoo...it hurt my feeling boohoohoo’.
    3
  3. FB and Twitter are private companies. They can do whatever they want. Long live capitalism. Government regulation is communism.
    3
  4. 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere. if you want to be 61, go ahead))))
    2
  5.  @williamfranz6639  'We'?? since when are you the spokesperson for the rest of Americans? ridiculous! the rest is gibberish ...
    2
  6. he is right. 60 cases have been filed about banning and censorship, all 60 went nowhere.
    2
  7. you are wrong. if you have a shop, you can decide what products are in it.
    2
  8.  @jbm0866  what are you talking about?? the market of social apps is the most competitive ever!!
    2
  9. 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere. this will be 61
    2
  10.  @lowellirish  no they can't! google is not the boss of the internet. show me the website that is 'blocked by google'.
    2
  11. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  12. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  13. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  14.  @zpclosangelesgraffiticafe  Wow, you think you are my boss and can give me orders ... That's so obnoxious ! YOU CAN'T!!! OKAY??
    1
  15. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  16. 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  17.  @williamfranz6639  nope. lets the market solve the problem; if there is a problem. thats capitalism.
    1
  18.  @williamfranz6639  Answer the question! Since when can you write as 'we'?? When did you get a mandate to speak for others? And don't make me laugh with your superpower status .... You have seen the debt of the USA? Did you see the way the rest of the world handled the corona virus, and how the USA did?
    1
  19. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  20. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  21. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  22. you are wrong. it has nothing to do with free speech
    1
  23. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  24. evidence?
    1
  25. yes he would!!
    1
  26.  @zpclosangelesgraffiticafe  hybrid??? That does not exist. And government regulation is communism
    1
  27. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  28. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  29.  @CarbageMan  yea yea yea ... promisses promisses
    1
  30. wow, you are a genius for remarking that! my neighbor has a bow tie! i will tell him!
    1
  31. he's right. 60 cases have been filed about banning and censorship, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  32.  @zinger8274  yea ... it's the judges thats the problem. ....
    1
  33. My god, you are still whining about a ‘rigged’ election ?? ‘boohoohoo ! I don’t like it when trump loses… boohoohoo...it hurt my feeling boohoohoo’.
    1
  34. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  35.  @littleshepherdfarm2128  why do you bother me this useless speculation? Do i bother you with far fetched vague unprovable conspiracies??
    1
  36.  @chrisbrunk5541  That NOT my opinion! it is a fact that at least 60 people/parties sued social media companies. And in ALL cases, the judge says: please READ the first amendment, you have no case. So don't bother me with useless hypothetical questions. There is NO violation of the first amendment.
    1
  37. nope, only in your imagination
    1
  38.  @michaelpike1704  show me evidence
    1
  39. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  40.  @nothingcanstopwhatscoming6664  Wow India? But that un be lie va ble! Let's do what India does! lets worship cows as gods!
    1
  41. why?
    1
  42. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  43. wow, you want to be banned, don't you?
    1
  44. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  45.  @crazedgoldminner7384  nah, it's going to be number 61 of a useless courtcase. Trump is just wrong. Fb and Twitter are private companies. they can do what they want. it's called CAPITALISM.
    1
  46. he is right (and you are of course wrong). 60 cases already have been filed about banning and censorship againt big tech, all 60 went nowhere.
    1
  47. what? how can google block a website?
    1