Comments by "evertvdb000" (@evertvdb000) on "This was a political operation to misdirect Americans: Sen. Johnson" video.

  1. what illegal activity? did you actually READ the Durham filing? He charged somebody with 'conflict of interest'. thats it. No 'spying' no 'infiltrating'. Thats all BS.
    6
  2. what illegal activity? did you actually READ the Durham filing? He charged somebody with 'conflict of interest'. thats it. No 'spying' no 'infiltrating'. Thats all BS.
    4
  3.  @SJSeverance  no, i think she is terrible. i didn't vote for her. i just hate conspiracy theories
    4
  4. what illegal activity? did you actually READ the Durham filing? He charged somebody with 'conflict of interest'. thats it. No 'spying' no 'infiltrating'. Thats all BS.
    4
  5. what illegal activity? did you actually READ the Durham filing? He charged somebody with 'conflict of interest'. thats it. No 'spying' no 'infiltrating'. Thats all BS.
    3
  6.  @Dean4511  'far from over' what? like after every 'audit', we heard the same old song. We are now 19 months after the election, and not 1 shred of evidence of a rigged election has been found. This will be the same disappointment. But I know know 'believers' will keep this alive... just another nutter conspiracy theory. if you think about it, if all those conspracies are true. All those people must work 24/7 setting all those conspracies up, and covering them up afterwards. whithout ever making a mistake. whathout anybody ratting out. Its not logical.
    3
  7.  @Dean4511  the 'info' has been available in the sept and nov 2021 indictments. There is nothing new. the only new thing is that Fox jumped on it now. that how YOU know. why Fox didn't jump on it in sept 2021 is a good question! Durham already wrote about this theory 2 times before, in the same vague and deliberalty technical jargon. if you know what DNS is, you realise there is no 'spying'. and Durham is not even indicting Joffe. the people that are charged, arent even involved in the theory Durham concocted. Buy hey, you do'nt have to believe me. Just READ the filing. If you can understand what Durham writes, you are a incredible mind reader.
    2
  8. what illegal activity? did you actually READ the Durham filing? He charged somebody with 'conflict of interest'. thats it. No 'spying' no 'infiltrating'. Thats all BS.
    2
  9. what illegal activity? did you actually READ the Durham filing? He charged somebody with 'conflict of interest'. thats it. No 'spying' no 'infiltrating'. Thats all BS.
    2
  10.  @user-bh6qs3ne9r  what steal? Nuestar was CONTRACTED to search for possible interference. its was all under OBAMA! they only saw DNS. that means connection information, not actually insight in documents or conversations.
    2
  11.  @K3Flyguy  i report this kind of comment to youtube, u think you understand
    2
  12.  @KellyCole1955  we have video of that day
    2
  13.  @lgbfjbmaga3930  contracted by the sitting president. Nuestar was contracted by the WH
    2
  14.  @bobgreene5460  no mention of china in the durham filing
    1
  15.  @amskeels  no! just read the filing. there is nothing about 'spying', nothing about 'infiltrating', the guy who did the surveillance of the DNS isn't even charged. look, i know you desperately want it to be true, but .... it just isn't. just like all the other 'cucu beep beep' conspiracies (bamboo ballots etc), this one is also NOT true. and no, the earth is not flat
    1
  16.  @williamhannon8187  evidence?
    1
  17. you know that its a cult now, right?
    1
  18. what illegal activity? did you actually READ the Durham filing? He charged somebody with 'conflict of interest'. thats it. No 'spying' no 'infiltrating'. Thats all BS.
    1
  19.  @QJSlim  have there been indictment on 'spying'? NO! Just for ' Lying', about things that are not even important, and very hard to prove anyway. i know you hoped the AZ audit would come up with something. But it didn't. this will be the same.
    1
  20.  @brentrodgers2702  how do you know you are not brainwashed?
    1
  21.  @QJSlim  i'm just reacting to people repeating the same nonsense. Its easy. you do'nt have to believe me! just READ the Durham filing. And READ the 2 filings before that (sept and nov 2021). they all have the same conspirady theory. all in very vague terms, and in abominal English. there is nothing there about 'spying'.
    1
  22.  @QJSlim  why later? if this all ends in a nothingburger, like all the 'audits', will you aknowledge you were wrong?
    1
  23.  @QJSlim  i know you never said anything about the audits, i never claimed that. i just make a, analogy. 30% of americans belive the 2020 election was stolen, and with every audit they hope there believe will be confirmed. But ... its always a disappointment. every audit gives Biden more votes. this will be the same. And still, 30% of americans will believe forever that Hillary spied on Trump.
    1
  24.  @cole5027  don(t try to guess my motives. You have no idea. I just hate conspiracy theories. If they come from the right or the left, i do'nt care.
    1
  25.  Joonnie Boi Ball Less Defends Racism  yes, and he was sentenced 400 hours community service. what did he do? he's not the spy that supposedly spied on behalf of hillary. or is he?
    1
  26. how do you know you are not a sheep?
    1