Comments by "evertvdb000" (@evertvdb000) on "Supreme Court sides with Christian students in First Amendment case" video.

  1. This case is NOT about freedom of speech or religion. The issue was whether Uzuegbunam’s demand the college pay him a nominal amount of money in damages — which could be as little as $1 — kept his civil rights case alive or whether it was moot once the university agreed to his complaint and ended its offending speech policy.
    2
  2. boring
    2
  3.  @JBomb517  there is something wrong with preaching and trying to convert people.
    2
  4. This case is NOT about freedom of speech or religion. The issue was whether Uzuegbunam’s demand the college pay him a nominal amount of money in damages — which could be as little as $1 — kept his civil rights case alive or whether it was moot once the university agreed to his complaint and ended its offending speech policy.
    1
  5.  @rowanaforrest9792  I never said it was about damages
    1
  6. so you think Roberts was right?
    1
  7. no it doesn't. The issue was whether Uzuegbunam’s demand the college pay him a nominal amount of money in damages — which could be as little as $1 — kept his civil rights case alive or whether it was moot once the university agreed to his complaint and ended its offending speech policy.
    1
  8. This case is NOT about freedom of speech or religion. The issue was whether Uzuegbunam’s demand the college pay him a nominal amount of money in damages — which could be as little as $1 — kept his civil rights case alive or whether it was moot once the university agreed to his complaint and ended its offending speech policy.
    1
  9.  @HisWordisLife4U  no! read the verdict. it's about a technicality, it's NOT about freedom of speech or religion. And what you say about 'to flood this campus ', that is discusting. A school is about learning, not about bothering people with your religion.
    1
  10. boring
    1
  11. no, we don't
    1
  12. boring
    1
  13. Do you know what it's about? The issue was whether Uzuegbunam’s demand the college pay him a nominal amount of money in damages — which could be as little as $1 — kept his civil rights case alive or whether it was moot once the university agreed to his complaint and ended its offending speech policy.
    1
  14. no, he is actually right. This isn't about free speech, the issue was whether Uzuegbunam’s demand the college pay him a nominal amount of money in damages — which could be as little as $1 — kept his civil rights case alive or whether it was moot once the university agreed to his complaint and ended its offending speech policy.
    1
  15. This case is NOT about freedom of speech or religion. The issue was whether Uzuegbunam’s demand the college pay him a nominal amount of money in damages — which could be as little as $1 — kept his civil rights case alive or whether it was moot once the university agreed to his complaint and ended its offending speech policy.
    1
  16.  @satguy  so ... its NOT about free speech, it's about a technicallity. Is that talked about in this video?? no! this is totally not possible in Europe, where you go to school to learn, and not to go to try to convert people.
    1
  17.  @satguy  good for you, but still, this video is misleading, isn't it?
    1