Comments by "evertvdb000" (@evertvdb000) on "Biden administration and Big Tech caught 'skirting' the First Amendment" video.

  1. any evidence he didn't?
    1
  2. yes you will
    1
  3.  @pixels303at-odysee9  yes you will endorse fake news
    1
  4. what is going here? tell us, master
    1
  5. you cannot win a case whitout going to court. and trump will always lose. the first amendment is on the side of big tech
    1
  6.  @maxwellgeary9632  do you have any arguments on this actual case? did you hear the arguments of the legal commentator on Fox News? Not on Cnn, but on Fox News?
    1
  7.  @maxwellgeary9632  so let me understand your argument ... before FB was 'acting under government directive', there was no problem with 'free speech' or 'censoring'. That is only AFTER the statement of PSaki? Right? so can you explain to me all the Whining and bleating and crying since Trump was thrown of Twitter about 'free speech' and 'censorship'. Then, there was no 'breach of First Amendment Rights'? right?
    1
  8.  @maxwellgeary9632  Stop avoiding my questions!! First: do you have any arguments on this actual case? did you hear the arguments of the legal commentator on Fox News? Not on Cnn, but on Fox News? Second: so can you explain to me all the Whining and bleating and crying since Trump was thrown of Twitter about 'free speech' and 'censorship'. Then, there was no 'breach of First Amendment Rights'? right? Answer these questions first before you dare to ask me questions!!
    1
  9.  @maxwellgeary9632  That is not the answers to my questions!! what you are saying is meaningless rambling. the fact that you knowingly and willingly avoid my questions means you very well know that. that is so vivious! But never mind! we will see where this will go. if you think trump will win, good luck! when was the last time he won in court?
    1
  10.  @candacem6932  yes I read the 1st amandment, and it's in FAVOR of big tech. Thats why they already won 60 'censorship' cases in a row and lost NONE. I don't watch MSM, I watch Fox News, and the legal advisor: I asked you 2 times about that, and you viciously refused to answer. ir's very simple: YOU ARE WRONG!
    1
  11.  @maxwellgeary9632  so what do you think a judge will do after 60 verdicts in favor of Big Tech? an none of the whiners who claim to be censored??
    1
  12.  @candacem6932  yes! because free speech only exists between a government and a private entity, not between private entities. You should know that because you prevent free speech constantly. if somebody in your house says something you don't like, you kick them out. no free speech exists in your house. if somebody taks too loud in a cinema, he gets kicked out, no free speech there! You don't understand the concept free speech, and you don't understand the concept censorship. That is very sad. sue your teachers.
    1
  13.  @candacem6932  why? you think free speech exists between you and your neighbour?
    1
  14.  @RoCkShaDoWWaLkEr  of course, if you lose, it's the referee's fault. Never your fault, because you 'would always win' ...
    1
  15.  @RoCkShaDoWWaLkEr  the 'swamp' is the same as the Loch Ness monster. It's a myth, a fairytale.
    1
  16. no, it doesn't
    1
  17.  Nicholas Isaza  already 60 lawsuits have been files against big tech for censoring. All 60 went nowhere. This will be numer 61. big tech have the 1st amendment on their side.
    1
  18.  Nicholas Isaza  so every company that has the government as a client becomes a government branche, and the 1st amendment suddenly doesn't apply anymore? Good luck with that argument in court))
    1
  19.  Nicholas Isaza  to show how moronic your argument is : why not the opposite? why does the government doesn't become a private company when it's working with FB?
    1
  20.  @thedizzyunicorn  my god, this is so obnoxious! you think you know it better than me! Hilarious ...
    1
  21. my god, are you still hoping that will lead to anything?? just like obamagate, durhamm, sessions ...
    1
  22. read the constitution
    1
  23. matt geatz?
    1