Comments by "asynchronicity" (@asynchronicity) on "The Hill" channel.

  1. The more these guys repeat the same empty statements over and over the less real it seems. What’s this really about?
    10
  2. Wow! Finally, definitive proof that a news outlet can milk a story for many more weeks than ever thought possible!
    7
  3.  @melovepeas  These are not critical thinkers
    6
  4.  @donkique956  We are not alone in the universe.
    6
  5. Yes. Intelligent, rational people prefer evidence and logic over fantasy and cult conspiracy theories.
    6
  6.  @italyvan  At least TickToc videos have decent resolution for the most part.
    5
  7. 12-15 crash retrievals. Only 12-15? 😶🤔🤦‍♂️
    5
  8. 😂okay, arrest Congress 🤦‍♂️
    5
  9. Ugh. No.
    4
  10. It’s always just around the corner……
    4
  11. They had a deal started but couldn't land it properly.
    4
  12. More talk. Endless hearsay and talk.
    4
  13. More skeptical on the right regarding UAP stuff? More gullible is more like it.
    3
  14.  @bobaseth1  You would have to cite exactly where Michio Kaku said such a thing. He is way too intelligent to say something like that. He would know that there is no way that you can prove a negative in this way.
    3
  15. Grusch mentions twelve crash retrievals. TWELVE! Come. On.😂🤦‍♂️
    3
  16. Orcas, elephants, chimps, crows, octopuses......
    3
  17. Because the credibility of this story is already pretty bad, let alone bringing that obvious con artist into the conversation....?
    3
  18.  @melaniecampbell7055  Yes. Critical thinking is for dummies.
    3
  19. It’s a perfect call! Lulz
    2
  20. Grusch's stories actually make the whole thing less believable. Tiresome.
    2
  21. Milk that cow
    2
  22. “Phenomenon” =singular. “Phenomena” =plural.
    2
  23. What the heck does that even mean? Hold him accountable in what way? Bizarre
    2
  24. Hunter Biden's laptop is involved how....??????
    2
  25. You're making me hungry for Reese's pieces
    2
  26. The endless spin continues. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    2
  27. The lack of evidence is proof of evidence to the believers.
    2
  28. Yeah and conveniently there is zero evidence presented.
    2
  29. This is a brilliant distraction from real problems. Congratulations, Pentagon!
    2
  30. Because she is being dishonest.
    2
  31. How is the evidence overwhelming? Maybe you need to look up the words "evidence" and "overwhelming" so that everyone is on the same page.
    2
  32.  @LarryFleetwood8675  When evidence is overwhelming, it is objectively obvious. There really is no dispute. You really can’t say that about this particular topic. It’s all claims, stories, very short clips of grainy video, obviously fake stuff, easily debunked stuff… And a bunch of things that are still not explained, which should be investigated.
    2
  33. Journalism school. Go back to a real one.
    2
  34. How convenient.
    2
  35.  @SubjectDredd  There's more than one way to look at that whole thing. My impression is that he is being a useful idiot for something higher up than him.
    2
  36. Very few believe your straw man scenario actually. It’s whether they are here is the question.
    2
  37. Power of the click
    1
  38. Yeah the whole thing is incorrect including that.
    1
  39.  @_Berserker__  He has become rather infamous as a grifter and egomaniac.
    1
  40.  @_Berserker__  Making them? Weird question. You have done his contact stuff?
    1
  41.  @_Berserker__  Every second of the day appears to be about making money with this guy. He has a whole industry surrounding "disclosure" and his central, messiah like role in it. He has been caught in lies about people that he says have given him inside information. He is quite a character.
    1
  42.  @_Berserker__  Yeah, I don't think he's pushing the needle really, but enjoy 👍
    1
  43. There's no proof of anything here
    1
  44.  @Shadinsb  yeah maybe that…. Or of Grusch’s deep need for attention
    1
  45. Always a conspiracy, haha….Thanks for the entertainment.
    1
  46. What has happened to this channel??🤦‍♂️
    1
  47. Because there is none.
    1
  48. Quit usin' them big words and just believe.
    1
  49. Are you trying to get us all killed?😅
    1
  50. 😂hardly
    1
  51. Just more fake information from this channel
    1
  52. Emily: “Actually.....actually......actually......actually......actually........actually........actually.....actually.......actually........actually.....” Actually?
    1
  53. And where did that go?
    1
  54.  @castorkat4868  No caps needed. Totally agree with you
    1
  55. 12 different craft retrievals over how many decades? In a year from now the number will magically be 23 crash retrievals.🤦‍♂️
    1
  56. Comer Pile is on it🤦‍♂️
    1
  57. Yep. It will go on and on forever with "disclosure" always imminent.
    1
  58.  @markstriker925  People who work in the government are still people. Just people.
    1
  59. Leslie Kean admits that she is a séance enthusiast and believes in objects flying around during seances. Seriously. This is not a serious journalist.
    1
  60. @HAL 9000 I love your confidence, haha.
    1
  61. How insane can Republican politics actually get? I think we’re just getting started.
    1
  62.  @ScoutsPatterson  No comparison. Trump is dragging the Republican Party into a burning sewer of insanity.
    1
  63. Ask Leslie about her beliefs about seances and paranormal activity surrounding talking with “the dead.” She’s not a serious journalist.
    1
  64.  @BazIrvine  Sure. I don’t see how they would ever be detected actually let alone crash and all that nonsense
    1
  65. "Alien Nightmare"...? Amber.🤦‍♂️
    1
  66. Terrible journalism. Total joke.
    1
  67. "Firsthand knowledge of what has been claimed." Of what has been claimed? Jfc. A bit more primary evidence than that, PLEASE 🤦‍♂️
    1
  68. Quite impressive how they can keep saying the same things in only slightly different ways over and over and over.
    1
  69.  @LarryFleetwood8675  Ah. What kind of timeframe do you expect?
    1
  70.  @LarryFleetwood8675  Connected with that --- what is the timeframe that you would give it before you decide that there wasn't anything really to it? Five years? A year?
    1
  71. Says it all.🤦‍♂️
    1
  72.  @Makewhatis  How?
    1
  73.  @Makewhatis  Thanks anyway !
    1
  74. David Grusch reminds me a LOT of George Santos😂
    1
  75.  @joebriggs5781  It's AMAZING 😅
    1
  76. More empty content. It’s hard to keep hyping this disclosure stuff when there really isn’t anything there but a mind game devised by the Pentagram… I mean the Pentagon.
    1
  77. It’s Grusch. He wasn’t that special. Do real research.
    1
  78. Yeah the location went from nowhere to totally empty space nowhere.
    1
  79. Your makeup won’t withstand the G force of a TicTac.
    1
  80. Burchett is a lunatic and an insurrectionist.
    1
  81. The Hill reporters need to go back to journalism school 🤦‍♂️
    1
  82. Hill is incorrect about this as well as this entire thing😂
    1
  83. This again🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ The question is whether they are here. Understand????
    1
  84. Where did they go? Did they phone home?
    1
  85. He’s always just about to tell us something. Meh
    1
  86. Josh Hawley 🤦‍♂️
    1
  87. This is entertaining.
    1
  88. Landing is hard
    1
  89. What information? It's a big zero. Are you serious?
    1
  90. Or the leprechauns in the subbasement whistleblower 😅
    1
  91. Hawley😂🤦‍♂️
    1
  92. Turtle Just Don’t Give a Shit
    1
  93. Serious discussion?🤦‍♂️
    1
  94.  @gapete361  I knew he was being misused in that way.
    1
  95.  @mikeboydus  Thanks. I will check that out.
    1
  96.  @mikeboydus  He also said: “The other possibility, however, is that they are optical illusions. If you have an object whizzing in front of your eyes, for example, very slowly, and you think this object is several miles away, then you calculate that this object is moving in hundreds of miles per hour. So in other words: perspective—you have to know the distance between the camera and the object. You are looking at the distance that is very hard to attain with these videotapes. With these videotapes, we don't know how far away these objects are.” So essentially he’s calling for more research into the tic-tac type of phenomena, and the military certainly should be able to get better evidence using sophisticated sensing techniques that use different technologies working together to better measure the phenomenon objectively. I agree with that. People tend to conflate this point of view he has with the crash retrieval stuff. I’m sure he isn’t on board with that in the same way.
    1
  97. "A lot of people are suspicious" Yeah, a lot of people are misinformed and paranoid too🤷
    1
  98. Will be sure to miss that nonsense.
    1
  99. "Aliens.... if you're listening...."
    1
  100. This is evidence for these believers. Talk and stories are evidence in their minds, and perfectly sufficient for their belief system.
    1
  101. Definitely
    1
  102. To protect yourself from extraterrestrials?😂
    1
  103.  @rexroscoeroggaschjr7530  January 6 was what you are talking about and that was ridiculous.
    1
  104. They interfere with your cult and weird ufo religion.
    1
  105. Hill. Seriously? Why own goal yourself like this with this hearsay?🤦‍♂️
    1
  106. "Soft launch the aliens.".....Jessica.🤦‍♂️
    1
  107.  @FrankPowers-q2j  Don't forget a grandiose narcissistic con artist.
    1
  108. News is faker than ever, that's why.
    1
  109. It's insane.
    1
  110. Obviously 🤦‍♂️I mean everything has been out in the open for anyone to examine in detail if they want to. Some interesting videos of alien autopsies and everything!
    1
  111. GULLIBLE CAPSLOCKER
    1
  112.  @SubjectDredd  Projection is a helluva drug.🤦‍♂️
    1
  113. Didn't think the Hill was this dishonest. Nothing has been verified.
    1
  114. Nope. Stop drinking and go back to sleep.
    1
  115. When I have had too much to drink, yes
    1
  116. Twelve different crash retrievals? COME ON PEOPLE
    1
  117. Evidence, please.
    1