Comments by "Vanessa" (@Vanessa-ok3ys) on "Tucker Carlson" channel.

  1. 132
  2. 85
  3. 66
  4. 63
  5. 47
  6. 44
  7. 35
  8. 31
  9. 29
  10. 27
  11. 26
  12. 23
  13. 22
  14. 22
  15. 18
  16. 17
  17. 14
  18. 14
  19. 14
  20. 14
  21. 14
  22. 14
  23. 12
  24. 12
  25. 11
  26. 11
  27. 10
  28. 10
  29. 10
  30. 10
  31. 10
  32. 10
  33. 9
  34. 9
  35. 9
  36. 9
  37. 9
  38. 8
  39. 8
  40. 8
  41. 7
  42. 7
  43. 7
  44. 7
  45. 7
  46. 6
  47. 6
  48. 6
  49. 6
  50. 5
  51. 5
  52. 5
  53. 5
  54. 5
  55. 5
  56. 5
  57. 5
  58. 5
  59. 4
  60. 4
  61. 4
  62. 4
  63. 4
  64. 4
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. 4
  68. 4
  69. 4
  70. 4
  71. 4
  72. 4
  73. 3
  74. 3
  75. 3
  76. 3
  77. 3
  78. 3
  79. 3
  80. 3
  81. 3
  82. 3
  83. 3
  84. 3
  85. 3
  86. 3
  87. 3
  88. 3
  89. 3
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. ⁠ @yikwanwong8267 All demonstrably false. Also you have no clue how the government works do you? The authority a President has? The Constitution? Abortion back to the states was Constitutionally correct even RBG knew that and said as much. If you want liberty then you must want the Constitution to be followed. Not followed only when its what you want. What your ilk is advocating for puts the Constitution through the wood chipper. The entire point and purpose of the STATES authority over all but a very few select things is it gives the people the most power over them. Is it easier for you personally to effect policy at the state level or the federal level? The state is the answer. If that authority is given to the federal level that means if he wanted to outlaw abortion he could. Because your demanding the federal gov have authority over this issue. All you are thinking about is what you want not longterm consequences. If you give that authority to the feds what happens when someone you dont agree with takes that office? Do you understand now why it should belong to the states? Ill give you another reason- your state makes a decision you dont agree with you can move to another, if the executive branch makes one ruling over the entire country you have no where to go. You should want the states to retain as much authority as possible because that is what actually protects you. You dont understand this. What you demand is that all authority be given to the fed level and that only those who share your ideology on the subject be given power over it. That is not freedom. So say whatever you want but do it honestly, it isnt DT you have a problem with its the Constitution and the separation of powers intended to protect EVERYONE not just people who think like you. Ive gone on and on about that abortion decision back to the states assuming thats what youre eluding to because like with all irrational leftists his support for ABIDING BY THE CONSTITUTION somehow equals taking your “rights” away. I dont even know how you all make that leap other than, as I said, having no clue how your own Republic works. You have an irrational fear youve allowed yourself to be convinced of all stemming back to your complete lack of knowledge and respect of the system that is in place to protect all of us from an abuses of power equally.
    1
  159.  @yikwanwong8267 ​​⁠​⁠All demonstrably false. Also you have no clue how the government works do you? The authority a President has? The Constitution? Abortion back to the states was Constitutionally correct even RBG knew that and said as much. If you want liberty then you must want the Constitution to be followed. Not followed only when its what you want. What your ilk is advocating for puts the Constitution through the wood chipper. The entire point and purpose of the STATES authority over all but a very few select things is it gives the people the most power over them. Is it easier for you personally to effect policy at the state level or the federal level? The state is the answer. If that authority is given to the federal level that means if he wanted to outlaw abortion he could. Because youre demanding the federal gov have authority over this issue. All you are thinking about is what you want not longterm consequences. If you give that authority to the feds what happens when someone you dont agree with takes that office? Do you understand now why it should belong to the states? Ill give you another reason- your state makes a decision you dont agree with you can move to another, if the executive branch makes one sweeping ruling over the entire country you have no where to go. You should want the states to retain as much authority as possible because that is what actually protects you. You dont understand this. What you demand is that all authority be given to the fed level and that only those who share your ideology on the subject be given power over it so it can be forced on everybody as you see fit. That is not freedom. So say whatever you want but do it honestly, it isnt DT you have a problem with its the Constitution and the separation of powers intended to protect EVERYONE not just people who think like you. Ive gone on and on about that abortion decision back to the states assuming thats what youre eluding to because like with all irrational left ists his support for ABIDING BY THE CONSTITUTION somehow equals taking your “rights” away. Its incoherent. I dont even know how you all make that leap other than, as I said, having no clue how your own Republic works. You have an irrational fear youve allowed yourself to be convinced of all stemming back to your complete lack of knowledge of and respect for the system that is in place to protect all of us from arbitrary abuses of power. So much so that when the SCOTUS gave you more authority and DT agreed with that decision you got very upset. Youre going to vote for the party that wants sole federal authority and calls that liberty.
    1
  160.  @yikwanwong8267 ​​⁠​​⁠​⁠All demonstrably false. Also you have no clue how the government works do you? The authority a President has? The Constitution? Abortion back to the states was Constitutionally correct even RBG knew that and said as much. If you want liberty then you must want the Constitution to be followed. Not followed only when its what you want. What your ilk is advocating for puts the Constitution through the wood chipper. The entire point and purpose of the STATES authority over all but a very few select things is it gives the people the most power over them. Is it easier for you personally to effect policy at the state level or the federal level? The state is the answer. If that authority is given to the federal level that means if he wanted to outlaw abortion he could. Because youre demanding the federal gov have authority over this issue. All you are thinking about is what you want not longterm consequences. If you give that authority to the feds what happens when someone you dont agree with takes that office? Do you understand now why it should belong to the states? Ill give you another reason- your state makes a decision you dont agree with you can move to another, if the executive branch makes one sweeping ruling over the entire country you have no where to go. You should want the states to retain as much authority as possible because that is what actually protects you. You dont understand this. What you demand is that all authority be given to the fed level and that only those who share your ideology on the subject be given power over it so it can be forced on everybody as you see fit. That is not freedom. So say whatever you want but do it honestly, it isnt DT you have a problem with its the Constitution and the separation of powers intended to protect EVERYONE not just people who think like you. Ive gone on and on about that abortion decision back to the states assuming thats what youre eluding to because like with all irrational left ists his support for ABIDING BY THE CONSTITUTION somehow equals taking your “rights” away. Its incoherent. I dont even know how you all make that leap other than, as I said, having no clue how your own Republic works. You have an irrational fear youve allowed yourself to be convinced of all stemming back to your complete lack of knowledge of and respect for the system that is in place to protect all of us from arbitrary abuses of power. So much so that when the SCOTUS gave you more authority and DT agreed with that decision you got very upset. Youre going to vote for the party that wants sole federal authority and calls that liberty.
    1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1:51:44 This is insane. Im 37, was diagnosed with ovarian cysts and hormonal imbalance at 15 and prescribed bcp. Was on bcp about a decade when they added a second prescription. Almost a year ago I became increasingly concerned about a pain in my left leg behind my knee, I think most women know bcp has a risk of blood clots. I had tried many times to go off the meds before particularly in the last 3-4 years and couldnt my hormones were so out of control. Longer story short Ive been prescriptoon free almost one year now with zero symptoms of hormone imbalance OR pcos/cysts AND leg pain GONE thanks to a magnesium supplement, a zinc supplement and spearmint tea every night. I spent TWO DECADES on dangerous prescription medications (that Im pretty sure were on the verge of causing blood clots) for no reason. 😳 As if that wasnt enough, I discovered this miracle cure by accident. I started having severe and frequent migraines. Only option according to two top neurologists other then kidney destroying migraine medications was an old SSRI anti depressant that for some reason helps with migraines. Im almost entirely opposed to these medications but was so desperate during a migraine attack I filled the script, read the list of side effects that came with it and said no way. Googled what else would help, saw magnesium deficiency as a possible culprit, took a magnesium capsule and within 20 mins this near debilitating migraine that had gone on for three days disappeared. So I kept taking the mag every night, my headaches decreased almost 100%. I only get them now when they are triggered by food so my fault, as long as I avoid soy and aged cheeses Im fine. During this time I ran out of my bcp and other prescription and since I use the VA I was out of them for weeks. I was panicking my body would freak out in the exact way it always did every time before I had tried to go off of these medications intentionally but this time nothing happened. Almost no symptoms of haywire hormonal imbalance etc. Did some more research that led to me add zinc and spearmint tea and I am 100% free of pharmaceuticals, female hormonal imbalance and most of my migraines. Imagine that. I have since learned that there virtually isnt a system in the body that doesnt benefit from or need magnesium. Anyone suffering from migraines or female hormonal imbalance I strongly advice you look into this. Magnesium has been an absolute God send for me, it cured me of two serious medical issues. I cant stress this enough.
    1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. No thats not it at all. Not even close. The argument is we do everything possible to keep certain countries down even to our own detriment while at the same time consistently doing other things that strengthen those countries and hurt our own. What makes the most sense is policy that is ALWAYS solely in the best interests of our country because our country being as strong as it can possibly be has the best outcome on all fronts. We dont want China running the world so we export all our manufacturing there and then try to wage some war against them and their allies on other fronts, like military capability? Its schizophrenic. It ensures constant conflict and power struggle, as in we literally assist them getting stronger stupidly and then squawk about how we must do this and this, almost always war related, because they are a threat. Versus solely relying on our own country as much as possible, all our manufacturing etc here, all our tax dollars here, building our military as strong as possible- if we are really interested in always being more powerful and influential then WHY ARENT WE DOING THIS. Why do we help them get stronger while weakening ourselves instead of making ourselves as strong as possible. We have the ability to be the most powerful country in the world without all the bullshit game playing. They would rather play the game because there is far less profit for them if they did things honestly and with loyalty to their country. Our politicians wouldnt make as much money without the game despite the fact that the game is absolutely detrimental to the American people. Including getting us killed in their stupid political wars.
    1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1