Comments by "Johanna S. L. Brushane" (@johannas.l.brushane2518) on "Nate The Lawyer" channel.

  1. Why on earths name would the wife of a foreign politician who previous worked for Rothschild's bank give blood to the doctor to an influencer who sympathise with Hitler's ideology just because said influencer deside to spread something like a cyber version of the ebola virus?
    2
  2. Amir Odom argued that the Macron's should just have agreed to be interviewed by Candace and submitted medical documents. Which is thoughtless if not straight BS. Candace is at best an influencer who repeatedly shown to handle information with less than good faith. She has been denied entrance to some countries for that. It's ludicrous to expect the standard of politicians to be required to sit and have a chat with any fringe social media creator who for some reason decide to bully their way to having that "interview". If Emanuel show signs of cognitive decline it could be reasonable for displaying his medical status on the grounds of the position and authority he has but not his wife though. Having said that I may not think that conspiracy theories as such should be banned, I am old enough to reckon that reality occasionally turn out to be more absurd than imagination can fathom. But there should perhaps be some pictogram in the thumbnails that warn for potential brain rot that may be contagious, like social leprosy or such? I don't know if Candace go on with malice about it or if she is a bit plain minded and become obsessive about a matter that someone whispered to her with the expectation that she would do just this. The matter first came from a french journalist quite far right leaning, but someone like Candace reach a somewhat different audience also for sure.
    1