Comments by "" (@resir9807) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1. Lowkey feel good cuz it let her dominate the discussion.
    201
  2. @Andrew idk know man sounds kinda racist to me. She's the only one who was actually read up on the science of IQ, besides potentially Ray.
    198
  3.  @dillonnav  Well she's the one who hit the nail on the head on the scientific dubiousness of IQ
    57
  4. Man, people gotta stop with the Maria hate, she's just somewhat arrogant and nothing more. Everyone is judging everyone else by their appearance all the time, she was just being cognizant of the fact.
    43
  5. she's the mvp imo.
    42
  6. Hmm, almost as if they were intentionally framing it that way to lend the video an emtional narrative.
    27
  7. Here to defend my girl Sada, the mvp. Everything she said about IQ was not only 100% on point and scientifically corroborated, but suggests she's actually well read up on the topic. She doesn't care about the ranking, her whole argument is that IQ is a hoax as a whole
    25
  8. Why is everyone pretending Harvard dude was this humble Zen master when probably he was just shy as fuck having spent his entire teenage life stuck to his computer and books
    22
  9. I want to share my story. When I was born, I didn't get circumsized. Then I lived life up to this moment and still haven't gotten circumsized. Thanks everyone for listening, I felt really vulnerable sharing this but I'm glad I did.
    18
  10. Well admit to themselves, to be precise, because I don't think any significant percentage is truly trying to deceive an anonymous poll. In reality, the percentage points are probably a tiny bit higher. There's probably a lot of "gray area" stuff when it comes to people's perception on stuff like cheating, so I'm guessing many people don't include stuff like emotional cheating or kissing, which means the percentage for that is probably significantly higher. On the other hand, I can't imagine why something like the therapy stat would be any different
    18
  11. "You've definitely thought about it [cheating] but didn't do it" Wtf? Huge ick. I somehow find that even more disgusting than just straight up picking someone as a cheater. Because you can always be graceful with the logic of "well I have to pick SOMEONE to match the statistic", but just saying that for no reason? Uncalled for
    11
  12. idk man, just sounds edgy to me to be honest. lot o loud and boisterious smart people out there. Intelligent people also tend to be arrogant occasionally
    10
  13. Just googled this guy, he's really the lowest of the low. His h-index is not bad, 23. But this guy requested and recieved 100 000 dollar fund from tobacco industries, then found that passive smoking was not as unhealthy as we thought. UCLA terminated his position, so then he sued them. It's disgusting
    9
  14.  @davidsantoso2291  nah, speaking from experience my friend
    4
  15. Don't worry I go to college and it's making me more insecure by the day
    3
  16. @Julio Paulino why not?
    3
  17. Well everything that Sauda said was 100% on point. And I guess you can interpret maria as being defensive because she's arrogant, but she's still right, if not as precise as Sauda.
    3
  18.  @johncole2744  Yeah that's... totally true, actually😂
    2
  19.  @Bl1zzaro    i finished my stochatics course last semester and you're just saying gibberish. IQ tests are not ""based off a group's standard deviation", they are modeled after one universal standard deviation. This does not mean that intelligence is actually distributed with this deviation, and it has even less to do with how subjective it is. My girl Sada said it best: the methodology behind IQ tests is bankrupt and has been debunked. It's some neat puzzle questions that test... SOMETHING, I guess? With a different IQ test, Kaylee could absolutely have scored higher. There's no "objective" IQ test. It's a meaningless concept, like saying something "objectively" costs 3 dollars.
    2
  20. I don't think it's sad, because intelligence doesn't mean anything in the first place, even though scientists have tried to define and prove it since the beginning of time. Everyone is simply good at that which they have done most throughout their life, with genetics playing a small role.
    2
  21. That's just kind of equating humility to intelligence. I'm very intimate with Uni culture, and BOY, there are a fuck ton of arrogant geniuses
    2
  22. Oh yeah, people just have such a gut reaction to arrogance. I mean, she was full of it, but she's still really accomplished.
    2
  23. Wow it's so easy to sniff out Americans. 1. Sauda was not being disrespectful, she was just explaining her biases. 2. How, exactly, is he risking his life? Have they deployed my dude in Syria? 3. Who exactly is he protecting her from? Putin? Terrorists? The north korean cavalry?
    2
  24.  @orangutank626  My dude, you need to take a hard look at the way you judge people😂😂 I play the piano, have done theater and am writing a fantasy novel. I'm not looking down upon anybody, why tf would I love STEM?? There's just so many people LIVID about her, which is just not warranted. She's a stuck up prick but at the same time she's a valuable member of society. YOU don't have to date her, do you? Maybe her boyfriend is just as insufferable, and they're making the world a better place by researching cancer and getting out of other people's way.
    1
  25. Sorry to burst ur bubble, but I have been around Uni culture my entire life. There's a fuck ton of arrogant geniuses out there
    1
  26.  @davidagostinho1807  I'm sorry - who are you arguing against? I just said, having been around Uni all my life, that I've met various people who have accomplished great things in their field of research and have a stick up their ass
    1
  27. She absolutely would have. What she said wasn't a vague denunciation of IQ like Maria's, it was formulated in highly specific language that indicates she's read up on the subject. And I can confirm the science corroborates 100% of what she said.
    1
  28.  @nilslindqvist8825  You just argued against an imaginary person. Obviously IQ correlates to academic success, as nobody disputes. Yet IQ tests are based on heavily flawed methodology. At best, it tests a highly specific aspect of intelligence. Project your wishful thinking onto someone else, patronizing isn't cool.
    1
  29.  @nilslindqvist8825  That's a fine Motte and Bailey you have there. Look, not to be disrespectful, but you're very much trying to have a petty debate rather than engaging with the stuff I'm saying. I don't care about this discussion anymore, good luck
    1
  30. Just researched james enstrom, he's really the lowest of the low. His h-index is not bad, 23. But this guy requested and recieved 100 000 dollar fund from tobacco industries, then found that passive smoking was not as unhealthy as we thought. UCLA terminated his position, so then he sued them. It's disgusting
    1
  31. then let me be the new smartest person you ever met to teach you this: Intelligence is meaningless as a general concept in the first place. People are skilled at a multitude of sub-disciplines.
    1
  32.  @cantankerouschris4596  I was being cheeky, my dude😂 and I totally agree
    1
  33. Lol that is hilarious because, as a matter of fact, education is the most significant factor. You should check out some studies on this topic
    1
  34.  @johncole2744  I'll do you one better: the ENTIRETY of IQ is determined by genetics and environment. What exactly do you think education is?
    1
  35.  @johncole2744  Well if you look at the data, college graduation correlates highly with high IQ. But just to be clear: IQ is a bankrupt concept anyway, it's as useless as a personality test.
    1
  36. So true
    1
  37. Except by your definition, every single IQ test is inaccurate. And fun fact: that's actually true! If you look at IQ test data, participants are far likely to score higher the more they do it.
    1
  38. Well they very obviously weren't random
    1
  39. Well, good thing IQ is a bankrupt concept anyway, as my girl Sauda pointed out. We don't even know if intelligence is distributed by standard deviation, that's just how the scores are modeled. It's like complaining a broken teacup is too small.
    1
  40. I don't know if you've noticed, but jubilee always spins a narrative. Ever wondered why you see so many cuts of one person and almost none of others? There's always a hero and a villain. Makes for more emotional viewer engagement.
    1
  41. That's because society still hasn't got it through their skulls that intelligence as a general concept doesn't exist, only a gigantic amount of hyperspecific capabilities
    1
  42.  @crowsong1  that's not intelligence, that's just IQ tests, who measure a tiny aspect. Sauda was being 100% accurate
    1
  43.  @crowsong1  Well, you can define intelligence for yourself any way you want, but there really is no scientific definition. Because, as I've said, intelligence as a general concept doesn't exist.
    1
  44.  @crowsong1  actually, we really can't agree on intelligence, there's no universal understanding of it. That's not just my opinion, it's scientific consensus. Oh, and IQ absolutely changes on depending on frame of reference! There is no objective IQ test. That's like saying a dollar has an objective value. The IQ test is based on faulty methodology, it's almost arbitrary. It's become popular only because people like ranking themselves.
    1
  45.  @crosselsmith776  Or policy based on complex statistical analysis demonstrating systemic obstacles for certain minorities. You can like it or not, at least read up on it
    1
  46.  @ritariza2835  She didn't even say it to him, did she? she didn't say "I don't value YOU". How exactly could she have phrased it differently to target the establishment as a whole instead of him individually?
    1
  47.  @swatchedlimpune6668  I don't understand why people are pretending this is a touchy issue. 99% of military personnel are never deployed on a front line, most are, let's face it, high school graduates who have no idea what to do (no disrepspect). Sauda was being blunt, the same quality everyone's simping Tyler for. And I really like the dude! I just agree that his establishment is pretty shitty.
    1
  48. Ok but the real question is, why ar u geh?
    1