Comments by "Lok Tom" (@loktom4068) on "Real Engineering" channel.

  1. It's paid Hollywood. Almost 70 years later NASA either getting dumber and dumber. Or the moonlandings were all created by Hollywood.
    1
  2. A piecof junk, soon sitting on the shelf with one of the many fairytales books of Wash-sin-dung.
    1
  3. Can't even copy the so called moon landing of the 1970s. Was it fake?or NASA is getting more dumber and dumber after each decades.
    1
  4. It's not like you say, folks. Usually, when copying previous successors or the earliest version, the newer ones are improved , updated , upgraded, and streamlined in production to improve the cost efficiency of the earlier version. Remember, many older components can be replaced with better quality and better technologies with the same functionality but with more advanced materials, lighter and better design. Unfortunately, the APOLLO program patents were too lousy for update and upgrade. Or was it something else that's not worthy to do further development?
    1
  5. @Hobbes746  There's more dark sides to the APOLLO PROGRAM not mentioned than just money and OEM designed problems that's not worth updating for further development for updates and upgrades. This is the conclusion of the APOLLO.
    1