Comments by "robheusd" (@robheusd) on "The Timestamp (9/11 investigation)" video.

  1. The part about taking over airplanes remotely is interesting, and this video should have focussed on that excluvsively. Esp. in regards to flight 77 which acc. to pilots for 9/11 truth did a manouvre that even trained pilots would find impossible to make (3/4 turn and then flying mere inches above the ground at full speed, hitting the pentagon at the spot where it did the least damage and which happened to have been recently reinforced, coincidently), So the case for remote taking over of that plane is much stronger and makes more sense. But instead of digging that topic out about remote control of airplanes, and how that relates to 9/11, the topic switches over to a patent issue, I don't understand. It's a total seperate issue from the taking over of airplanes remotely. And the connection to 9/11 is not clear. And can someone tell me what is so special about a timestamp? The video is not at all clear what is so special about a patent about a timestamp. He speaks about it like he invented a predecessor of blockchain or something, but then, it is not clear how it would be connected to that. There is a lot of information missing for the viewer to make sense of this. (Info about the patent can be found here: https://patents.justia.com/inventor/todd-s-glassey)
    2