Youtube hearted comments of robheusd (@robheusd).

  1. Mars offers no opportunity for humans to live permanently due to the harsh conditions. Living conditions on Antarctica are comparitatively much better (earth gravity, atmosspheric pressure and water available), yet (outside of some scientific research stations) antarctica has been avoided by humanity for habitation. It's fruitless to bring people to Mars. We could better bring artificial intelligent robots to Mars to do all the work humans would have to do (creating infrastructure for energy, water, oxygen and food supplies), and only bring in people to Mars on temporary basis to do science excursions, without having to worry about enerhy, oxygen, water and food supplies. Good test bed environment for AI developers, to create autonomous artificial intelligent robots that can create human living conditions on Mars....
    26
  2. You would need a slave ship design to transport that many people to Mars....
    4
  3. Great ideas. Particularly like the idea of storing code in a database instead of text. It would open up other possibilities too, besides that the visial representation (formating) can be adjusted by the user, you could even make the programming language multi-languagal (using chinese, arabic, cyrillic or any other writing system and language). And a versioning system integrated into the language and getting rid of built systems is an attractive feature too.
    4
  4. The only reason gas attacks occur in Syria is because Syria is in the centre of a geopolitical gas battle - and since Syria blocked a pipeline project wih Qatar/Saudi arabia in 2010, Syria has become the target of "regime change" operation. The rebels want support from western nations to overthrow Assad by faking chemical attacks. A similar thing happened in Britain, which has to import russian gas through delivery by Netherlands, but since Britain in in Brexit negotiations, this depency on russian gas makes them nerveous... (pun intended). Now Trump is criticizing Germany because of russian gas deliveries. Germany should take care now, because it could provoke nervous gas attacks on german soil in the future....
    3
  5. The part about taking over airplanes remotely is interesting, and this video should have focussed on that excluvsively. Esp. in regards to flight 77 which acc. to pilots for 9/11 truth did a manouvre that even trained pilots would find impossible to make (3/4 turn and then flying mere inches above the ground at full speed, hitting the pentagon at the spot where it did the least damage and which happened to have been recently reinforced, coincidently), So the case for remote taking over of that plane is much stronger and makes more sense. But instead of digging that topic out about remote control of airplanes, and how that relates to 9/11, the topic switches over to a patent issue, I don't understand. It's a total seperate issue from the taking over of airplanes remotely. And the connection to 9/11 is not clear. And can someone tell me what is so special about a timestamp? The video is not at all clear what is so special about a patent about a timestamp. He speaks about it like he invented a predecessor of blockchain or something, but then, it is not clear how it would be connected to that. There is a lot of information missing for the viewer to make sense of this. (Info about the patent can be found here: https://patents.justia.com/inventor/todd-s-glassey)
    2
  6. Now a next video: Alexa chatting with Google....
    1