Comments by "" (@1987BillyBob) on "JD Vance won't admit TRUMP LOST during VP debate gone OFF THE RAILS" video.

  1. Harris, as VP, had many tie breaking votes in the Senate including the inflation reduction act and the infrastructure bill. Along with that, as mentioned in the debate, the VP is the last person the president consults with before making any final decisions. That is normal as they are first in line for president if something were to happen to them. So the president and VP should be on the same page.
    3
  2.  @Rochrikqv  I did, Walz skirted around a lot of questions. Vance answered most of the questions. It was 3 on 1 again and Vance did great, Walz did not. Also, it is important to bring up Harris, Walz is talking about what Harris plans to do, well, why didn't she do it the past 3 years?
    2
  3.  @Joshuwiii  I still have hope, or will be ready to laugh if Trump wins and has success again.
    2
  4.  @HannibalBarca247BCE  under Trump the economy was strong and we had a more peaceful world. Where is the blame?
    2
  5.  @taranullius9221  I don't think higher prices helps people. Those bills made things worse. JD pointed that out. Also, the president does not run Congress. The point is that Harris 1. Had a say in bills supported by the Biden team 2. The president consults with the VP because if something were to happen to the president the VP is next in line. It makes sense they on on the same page when it comes to policies. But again, you literally just said the president runs Congress when Congress is a completely separate branch from the executive.
    2
  6. So of all the issues, immigration, energy, economy, etc. your one concern is what supposedly happened in 2024?
    2
  7.  @hwnsrfaboy43  there was no insurrection.
    2
  8. They brought up 2020 first.
    2
  9. The lies about covid were from the left. Covid showed how anti-science the left is. Come May of 2020 if you were still scared of covid you are an idiot
    1
  10. Fun fact, there was no Jan 6th insurrection.
    1
  11. It was a peaceful transfer of power. In Jan 20th Trump left and Biden entered. Doesn't get any more peaceful than that. That as opposed to the massive riots during Trump's Inauguration.
    1
  12. It was one of many loaded questions by the moderators. JD is correct in that Clinton in 2016 blamed Russia for her election loss. You had years of talks of Russia collusion with a full investigation. JD was also correct in the threat to democracy is censorship. Along with that, most independents do not care about the 2020 election, it is 2024. JD won this one.
    1
  13. More like Harris to Walz "blame Trump for everything"
    1
  14. Because they can't run on their current record.
    1
  15. A few things, how do you know it was free and fair? Clinton and democrats said the 2016 wasn't. Same with the 2000. Trump and his team were looking for an investigation like Clinton and Gore got, especially in an election during a very odd time. Do you support transparency? That is a better question.
    1
  16.  @ncwordman  but yet the democrats did an investigation of Russia collusion. Also, Trump admitted he lost, he just wanted an investigation like what the democrats got, and like what Gore got in 2020.
    1
  17.  @MultiBlackmind  there was no evidence because there was no investigation. Around 3 years after the 2016 election there was an investigation on it. Why are you guys against transparency? Oh, when your side wins you are OK with corruption, but when your side loses you cry foul.
    1
  18. When did JD deny the election results?
    1
  19.  @HannibalBarca247BCE  sigh.....again, the VP is consulted by the president as they have to be in line because the VP is a heart beat away from being president. Also, again, Harris was the tie breaking vote on many issues in the Senate such as the infrastructure bill and the inflation reduction act. Also, things were better under Trump. You bring up the "pandemic" when it were the democrats that shut down the economy. You fell for their scam.
    1
  20.  @jaycorbin  high unemployment will happen when democrats shut down business
    1
  21. He did.
    1
  22.  @Austin-zc9gp  he did. He pointed out we need to move on as almost everyone has. The only people who still talk about it are Trump haters. Talking about the 2020 election is not going to end wars or put food on people's tables. You guys keep bringing it up because you can't run on Biden/Harris record. Along with that, democrats have denied election results as well. Clinton did it in 2016. Gore did it in 2000 and many still deny that election. Heck, Michael Moore did a move about it. I fully didn't agree with Trump's rhetoric, but I moved on just like I moved on from Clinton and the democrats' rhetoric on their election denial. I care about paying bills, wars, immigration, etc.
    1
  23.  @Deadlyvoltage3  both sides are guilty of questioning election results. Stacy Abrams did it. Clinton did it in 2016. Gore did it in 2000 with many democrats still making claims of that election being rigged. Why do you ignore all of that? And there was no insurrection. The only people who care about 2020 are Trump haters. Most independents care about events now; the economy, immigration, etc. The fact is you guys cannot run on democrat policies because they have been terrible, so you have to cry "January 6th" or "Trump denied the election" as if that plays a role in peoples' lives.
    1
  24.  @Ravencall  under Trump the economy, border and energy were better, period. That is why you guys can't run on them. That is why you have to bring up the 2020 election in which no one cares about except Trump haters. The fact you bring up that but ignore Clinton's and democrats' denial of the 2016 election speaks volumes. Or the fact that instead of trying to work with Trump democrats impeached him speaks volumes. Or the censorship by the left you deny speaks volumes. But great way of showing your bias. At this point Trump could literally find a cure for AIDS and cancer and you guys will say "he is an election denying dictator, bad man". Trump could say the world is round and you all will become flat earthers. That is radical you are.
    1
  25. It as peaceful. Come Jan 20th Trump left and Biden entered. In fact, during Trump's inauguration you had riots taking place. That did not happen during Biden's inauguration.
    1
  26.  @CJDiecast  I was not talking about Jan 6th. I disagree with the riots like I disagreed with the months of riots by BLM and the riots by the left during Trump's inauguration and after. I am talking about Trump and how on Jan 20th he left the white house and Biden entered. And there were no riots during that time. Please, try to keep up.
    1
  27. It is a honest question. If the democrats are going to bring up 2020, then bring up 2016 and how Clinton and the democrats blamed Russia collusion and had a full investigation. Or if you are going to talk about a threat to democracy then talk about censorship and how the left pushes for it calling anything they disagree with as "misinformation". Heck here, why did the moderators have to do "fact checking" when they never did it to Walz?
    1
  28. It is a legit point. If you are going to talk about Trump and 2020 then talk about the massive censorship from the left.
    1
  29. He did answer it. It was a loaded question and JD was correct right off the bat, we need to look to the future. Most have moved on from 2020. Who cares about the 2020 election? If you are going to talk about that then talk about the massive censorship from the left which happened. Or the fact that Clinton blamed Russia for 2016 and democrats did a full investigation after complaining about it for years. The fact that you guys still care about 2020 is a massive red flag. Who cares? It is 2024, talk about current issues.
    1
  30. Because no one cares. Independents: "It is difficult to pay bills with high prices" The left: "Jan 6th, Trump denied the election" What do people care about more?
    1
  31.  @francine5536  no, I call it mostly peaceful and some expressing their emotions in an inappropriate way. That is not an insurrection. An insurrection takes planning, takes months to years to happen. Also, I find it funny how the left will say on one side that our guns can never overthrow the government, but a bunch of unarmed people with no plan can.
    1
  32.  @I_WillB  it wasn't that it failed, it is that it was not an insurrection to begin with. Please, learn what an actual insurrection is.
    1
  33.  @MultiBlackmind  nope, what Trump says has nothing to do with it. An insurrection requires planning, takes months to do. Want an example? The Revolutionary War. How long did that last? A lot more than 2 hours. How much planning was there? A lot. A bunch of people expressing their anger in the wrong way for a couple of hours is not an insurrection. That is called a tantrum which the left threw for months when Trump won in 2016.
    1
  34.  @MultiBlackmind  also, a tantrum is what you are throwing right now like you are a child
    1
  35. Fully automatic weapons are highly restricted as is where no new ones can be made and to own one you basically have to pay a lot and sign your life away.
    1
  36. Also, when the 2nd amendment was created there were guns around that shot multiple rounds in a short amount of time.
    1
  37.  @MultiBlackmind  when the 1st amendment was created, the internet did not exist. Now get rid of free speech.
    1
  38.  @jaycorbin  Doesn't matter, they existed. Cannons existed as well and people were allowed to own those and still can.
    1
  39.  @jaycorbin  but they can if they want. That is the point. The founding fathers also understood technological change was going to happen.
    1
  40. It is a loaded question that most moderates do not care about. It is 2024. Most have moved on. JD is correct that the democrats talk about Trump and him being a threat to democracy when Clinton and the democrats blamed Russia for 2016. Noticed how Walz did not respond to that? Or the constant censorship the left supports, noticed how Walz had no response to that? In 2020 Trump wanted an investigation in the election during odd times and was dismissed immediately despite all the oddities and massive censorship. But when democrats cried Russia collusion they ended up wasting taxpayers' dollars getting an investigation.
    1
  41. No one cares about the 2020 election, people care about the economy, immigration and foreign wars. Banning "assault weapons" (which has no definition) does not get rid of them. There is no way to make sure all have healthcare. Resources are limited.
    1
  42. Well, it is hard trying to paint Trump's presidency as bad while trying to paint the Harris administration as good. Harris and Walz have nothing to run off of. That is why they have to talk about the 2020 election, they can't run on the Biden/Harris record.
    1