Comments by "" (@1987BillyBob) on "11-year-old LOVES the show, getting my children's book" video.

  1. When is Pakman going to talk about the Fani Willis case? When is Pakman going to talk about how Biden was labeled as having a poor memory?
    2
  2.  @sisuguillam5109  there is. There was recently a trial. She recently testified in court, same with her lover and many of her staff. It did not go well for her.
    2
  3. David's books are not good, especially the scientist one. The scientist one is comparable to the Monty Python movie to determine how someone was a witch. That if she weighed as much as a duck then she must be a witch. No further thought. Terrible book.
    2
  4. Have you read them?
    2
  5.  @LittleBitofHopeToo2518  they are both really big deals. Biden can't remember things so can't stand trial but can be president? And Fani ran on sending Trump to jail where she is now most likely going to jail herself.
    1
  6.  @MultiBlackmind  I just showed you do not understand science at all. Your knowledge of science is as low as Pakman's knowledge.
    1
  7.  @MultiBlackmind  so now you run and hide I see
    1
  8.  @Brozius2512  how come every response you have it to simply call people a troll? Are you really that stupid?
    1
  9.  @sisuguillam5109  this is not libel and slander. Also, Pakman is not well known. He has a small following. You cannot find his show on anything mainstream. Chances are these are fake.
    1
  10.  @MultiBlackmind  I have read many books. As for "proven science', that shows you have little you know about science. Science does not prove anything. Don't believe me, look up the UC Berkley source "Understanding Science" where they say "Journalists often write about “scientific proof” and some scientists talk about it, but in fact, the concept of proof — real, absolute proof — is not particularly scientific. Science is based on the principle that any idea, no matter how widely accepted today, could be overturned tomorrow if the evidence warranted it. Science accepts or rejects ideas based on the evidence; it does not prove or disprove them." I recommend you read a little bit.
    1