Comments by "" (@1987BillyBob) on "Trump EXPLODES after court denies him immunity from prosecution" video.

  1. The point of immunity is to give the president flexibility to do their job. The punishment is impeachment.
    5
  2. If you read the CO SC decision it had the tone that no matter what the US SC was going to make the decision. In all there is a good chance the SC rules in favor of Trump 9-0.
    2
  3. The argument is that the president has flexibility to do their job. However, if they stop out of bounds there is an impeachment process to remove them from office. They can still be a crook.
    2
  4. This is the norm from Trump. Also, he is going to win the ballot case. Chances are it will be a 9-0 vote in favor of Trump.
    2
  5. Many things here. One, stalling is a good strategy in legal cases. Next, this new territory that the SC will take. Same with the ballot removal.
    2
  6. How was Trump a dictator?
    1
  7.  @ktkt1825  Clinton argued immunity in the Paula Jones case.
    1
  8.  @DaveCM  still does not answer the question.
    1
  9.  @donnagal569  he said he would be a dictator day one by closing the borders and drilling for oil, and that was it. It was a tongue in cheek comment to mock those that call him a dictator (like you). And again, he said it would be day 1 and that is it. Nothing more. When has he admired Putin, Xi and Kim Jung un? He mocked Kim. Meanwhile, Newsom cleaned up the streets of San Fran for Xi, but not for his people. What about national security? "Wish convicted rapist and fraudster has brought chaos to our country. " Now you are making no sense. " Interesting that he and his supporters spout putins talking points." Such as........?
    1
  10.  @crazboy84  yeah, for a day. One day. Are you ESL? Also, he said what he would do; close the borders and drill.
    1
  11.  @Alltime2050  what insurrection?
    1
  12. What crimes did he commit?
    1
  13.  @nicklindberg90  never said it would put him above the law. There is a process to punish the president. It is via impeachment. That is the whole point.
    1
  14.  @Lee-gr7oh  and if any president were to do that, including Biden, that would lead to grounds of impeachment and removal. That is the process of punishing the president.
    1
  15.  @timthomson7532  compared to Pakman and his fans I am.
    1
  16.  @timthomson7532  and I gave you a serious answer.
    1
  17.  @justanotheropinion5832  nothing, which is why I want Trump as president.
    1
  18. Clinton did.
    1
  19. Also, this is a legal strategy to delay the case. This case is purely political to mess with the election. Trump found a way to delay it so it happens after the election (if at all). That is why Jack Smith wanted the SC to rule quickly on it.
    1
  20. @Mike-ock what laws did he break?
    1
  21. @Mike-ock also funny how all these cases are timed up to all be occurring during the election time.
    1
  22.  @fstorm2  you can say that but he is playing a smart game legally. That is why Jack Smith wanted the SC to look at it right away. Smith sees the delay tactic. All these legal attacks on Trump are purely political to mess with the 2024 election. If it is delayed then Trump ends up the winner.
    1
  23.  @michaelazara740  well, he won impeachment to start. Also, almost every legal expert is saying the SC is going to rule in Trump's favor in the ballot situation.
    1
  24.  @jessifer23f  in both cases the 67 vote threshold in the Senate was never met. So Trump was never removed. The impeachment failed.
    1
  25.  @dystopian..  the whole impeachment thing was purely political. The second time Trump was leaving office in a week. In the second impeachment Justice Roberts skipped the trial as he knew it was BS. Tulsi voted president in the first impeachment knowing it was a waste of time as 67 votes in the Senate were never going to happen. So go ahead and applaud your democrats for wasting time and tax payer dollars on two failed impeachments.
    1
  26. Not true. If Biden, or any president were to do that then that would lead to impeachment. That is how presidents get punished.
    1
  27. @Mike-ock then you have a fascist and dangerous president on your hand. At that point the people will vote in new Senate members and this will go as far as states making changes.
    1
  28. It is a smart legal strategy to delay the case. The whole thing is political to try to mess with the election. Delaying the case means nothing will happen until after the election. Trump wins in the end.
    1
  29. Clinton argued it in the Paula Jones case.
    1