Comments by "Pob" (@goodlookinouthomie1757) on "12 News" channel.

  1. As opposed to Katie Hobbs, who is the government overseer of the election she is a candidate in. And who is in charge of certifying the results. And who refused to relinquish that role for the sake of public confidence. Nothing suss about that at all right?
    8
  2. Katie Hobbs is the Gubernatorial Overseer for the AZ election. She decides which votes are certified. And she would not give up that role as a conflict of interest. Makes ya think.
    4
  3.  @courierton9217  You mean it's which votes are counted that counts, not the sign.
    4
  4.  @mikezap61  Listen, I'm an expert at cheating and take it from me, you always want to give the impression it was a close race so your own side don't start getting suspicious.
    2
  5. Katie Hobbs is the Gubernatorial Overseer for this election. I mean, in a system with any integrity that would be a dealbreaker due to the conflict of interest. But she refused to stand down from the role. I can imagine if that had been Lake's role we would have been hearing all about it constantly.
    1
  6. ​ @MsCartman74  Well, in football, it's hard to cheat without anyone seeing. And also, the referee isn't generally alowed to be a player in one of the competing teams.
    1
  7. I sort of agree. If they cheated, what makes Lake think any amount of contesting will change it? They will just cheat some more.
    1
  8. If indeed there is fraud and the Dems are pulling the levers (see Hobbs' role as Gub. overseer that she refuses to relinquish as a conflict of interest), what makes Lake think that any amount of contesting will change that? The problem is nobody with integrity can have any faith in elections as long as they drag it out for an undefined amount of time and (regardless of whether there's fraud or not) give the distinct impression that shady business is going on behind the curtain. What it LOOKS like is that they carry on counting as long as it takes until they 'find' the votes they need. This may or may not be the case but that's the impression it gives people. The fact that they won't fix these incredibly bad optics is suspect in and of itself.
    1
  9. Yeah. Stick to the plan. It's like trying to win against the casino. The house always wins.
    1
  10. You mean really weird statistics with Dems making miraculous victories? You mean news stories highly damaging to Democrats being suppressed in the media until after the elections? Yes we did.
    1
  11. The house always wins.
    1
  12. I must admit, the fact that it takes almost 2 weeks to count votes in an election just looks suss. I'm not surprised half the people in your country call fraud whichever wat the result goes. You have a system that does not instill trust and confidence in it.
    1