Comments by "Jesse" (@jessejive117) on "NYC Rejects Defund The Police" video.

@Olivia-bl8ez da. Isn’t it crazy how they call Nazis, the national Socialist workers party of Germany, right wing with their concentrated federal power? That’s like the staple of conservatism and libertarianism, removing federal power. That is like the entire definition they are just in charge of the military and border security which is literally a federal thing by the mere function of those two public goods.
2
@marcusverschollen9634 You are right simply doing what you’re told doesn’t absolve you from the evil you do. I do agree with that. Everything else she said was stupid
2
@marcusverschollen9634 no. I like not being murdered. Anyone who thinks they should defund the police are beyond privileged or they are criminals that want to get away with crime. There’s nothing else. Or just completely delusional.
1
Oh yeah because federal agencies have desk job leaders who are very far left and will essentially prosecute people for their political beliefs. They just want criminals to be able to murder people but they still want enough authorities to arrest people who disagreed with him politically
1
@henri3446 The federal government or like the federal authorities? Why the h@ll should they exist? And because they routinely infiltrate groups that they deem terrorist and they initiate the actual terrorism. They are political activist who have political agendas and work for the federal government to prosecute people for political beliefs. Why don’t you name three great things the FBI have done.
1
@Don True, the only two things the federal government were intended to do which was national defense and border security. He’s clearly talking about specifically federal agencies in the term of agent like an FBI agent or someone who has the ability to arrest you. I know you were kind of stupid and you don’t ever seem to understand what people are saying but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt this time. I’ve never heard the military referred to as an agency.
1
@Gurfi28 well first of all states don’t have to enforce federal law at least not all of them. That’s why marijuana is still illegal federally but it’s legal in certain states. If these agencies are in force certain laws don’t exist anymore, then those laws can’t be enforced. So it doesn’t matter if somethings illegal if it can’t be enforced because there’s no one to enforce it. Obviously murder is a federal crime but it’s also illegal on the state level. Certain things should be federally illegal like murder or slavery or kidnapping or pedophilia but it should only be a handful of things they need objective standards. I think pretty much all drugs are horrible for people and ruin society and nothing good would come from legalizing them except more death more lives ruined and more crime, but it’s not the federal governments job to tell people what they canning can’t put in their body. And when I say drugs I don’t mean things like caffeine or ibuprofen obviously and anybody who compares that to things I actually alter your ability to think the same way or react the same way are complete dishonest idiots. Yes they are dishonest and they are idiots. Morons can lie too lol no marijuana is not good for you in anyway at all. Alcohol has way more benefits from you drinking recreationally than marijuana but I don’t care if it’s legal and I don’t think it’s nearly as bad as heroin or meth. You come to my house on meth I don’t care if it’s legal, I’m going to shoot you lol as long as I didn’t invite you over of course.
1
@marcusverschollen9634 not really. I’d imagine police and soldiers are some of the most pro second amendment human beings on earth. That being said, they are the only ones even capable of arresting you for that crime unless you’re breaking federal law then someone can do a citizens arrest but that’s so unbelievably rare. Yes some police do enforce the terrible gun laws that shouldn’t exist but they are far far far far far outweighed by the necessity in the benefit of the police and good police officers. I don’t think the federal government benefits outweigh the cons. And I literally mean cons because they employ so many child r@pists
1
@marcusverschollen9634 also you are making me defend AOC because you are so stupid and uninformed. AOC does not want to use the state police force to remove the second amendment. Even if everything you said was true. We will fight people removing the Second Amendment with literally the Second Amendment and blow people away so it’s not going to happen but we’re worried about having to do that.
1
@Individual_Lives_Matter how would privatizing the police force at all prevent the Second Amendment from being removed and outlaw being enforced? Are you saying if it was privatize all private companies would agree we should remove the Second Amendment and would enforce that law because that’s absolutely ridiculous to claim.
1