Comments by "Hobbs" (@hobbso8508) on "Bloomberg Television" channel.

  1. @Kyle Rittenhouse Because Republicans have never disregarded human rights? Account created today I see.
    18
  2.  @xs650abear6  Adams already said he won't enforce it, so not really anything to do.
    13
  3.  @queenofqueens697  Yer sure. Pull the other one, its got bells on.
    7
  4.  Milly Willy  Yet it's working well so far.
    7
  5.  @AntisocialExtrovert90  mRNA vaccines have not been shown to cause clots. J&J had a blood clot issue in roughly 1 in every 1 million vaccinations. Covid also causes blood clots at a rate of around 39 per 1 million, so 39 times more often than J&J. So, enjoy YOUR blood clots.
    5
  6. Which part of the constitution? Can you point it out? I don't see it on there.
    5
  7. It can survive 5 days after being defrosted.
    4
  8.  @aalvarez2914  "half the people who fell ill with delta in Israel were fully vaccinated" Israel's exact wording was "as many as" meaning 50% is their upper limit. The population is also 57% vaccinated, meaning you are still safer to have it. Their predictions based on what they've seen are 88% efficacy. It's possible that the vaccinated are being effected at a high rate due to them being outside unmasked and travelling more. "but they do not stop you from getting infected or spreading it to others" Actually they do. That 88% efficacy is the immunity rate. Only 12% can be infected. "That only happens after you’ve actually been exposed to the virus, like many of us already have." For how long though? Similar reinfections can also happen, same as the vaccine. "That’s when you build a mucosal secretory Iga antibody layer and response, which is what protects you from being infected and spreading it to others." They're actually reviewing a vaccine that does specifically this, but that's not to say that the existing vaccines don't do this at all. "These only give your body awareness of a piece of the spike protein too, versus people who’ve gotten over the real virus, who’s immune system now knows the full virus and can detect variants better too." The spike protein targets a specific area of the virus. Without this natural immunity may develop any number of methods to stopping the infection. This means the ability of your body to stop variants is a guessing game, as you don't actually know how your body decided to fight the virus. "That’s fine but there’s also no long-term safety studies on reprogramming live human cells to start creating custom proteins with lab-sequenced mRNA wrapped in polymerized antifreeze which is what the lipid shells are." you're joking right. Reprogramming cells to create custom proteins is a daily affair. "There are people dying from the vaccine they are downplaying and pretending their deaths had nothing to do with it, young people who had very little risk from the virus itself." Very few. So far the vaccines are far safer than the virus. Also, with new variants coming out and hospitalisations effecting younger and younger people with the new Delta variant, the idea that things aren't going to get worse for the unvaccinated, no matter their age, is ridiculous. "There is a backwards desperation to prevent there being a control group, because they don’t want it known a lot of unvaccinated people are doing just fine without it." Actually the control groups are required to be offered the vaccine after the clinical trials have concluded due to ethical reasons. It's literally illegal to do so. "The partial immunity the vaccine provides also lets people get infected and spread it, just with milder symptoms and creates evolutionary pressure for mutations too." The 94% immunity the vaccines give stops the spread. The other 6% are so mild that the viral load is never really enough to pass it on in significant quantities, nothing like catching it while unvaccinated. Mutations are happening in the unvaccinated. Delta for example is from India, which even now is only 22% vaccinated. "The people relying on the “vaccine” don’t seem to understand you still need the basics of a healthy immune system, or you’re still going to be infected with mild symptoms if you’re lucky, possibly creating variants and also spreading it to others." The people not relying on the vaccine risk death as well as all those other things sooo..... "The clinical claim is the vaccines reduce severe illness and death, that’s it " Right, but that doesn't mean that's the only thing it does. "That’s fine but that’s different than conferring immunity anywhere near natural immunity provides, which many already have so they don’t need this extra risk." Your plan just sounds like letting people die from covid and hoping nobody gets reinfected. Never mind the 600K Americans dead already, this kind of thinking will kill millions. There will be many more with long-term health complications such as heart damage, lung damage and fatigue. This is the dumbest answer.
    4
  9.  @xs650abear6  I would feel better if Republicans would stop trying to get people killed, but to each their own.
    4
  10. I agree. Did you see all those signs about wearing a seatbelt. If I want to fly through the windshield and smash my face on the pavement then that's my right.
    3
  11.  @NeightrixPrime  That's simply not true. Hillary was only up on average by around 3 points nationally. Biden is up at the 8-9 point range. Many states that were a toss-up in 2016 are looking much more heavily favored this time around. Hillary was down 3 points in Iowa, Biden has it even. Michigan was 5 points, now it's 7. Missouri was an 11 point lead for Trump, now it's a 7 point lead. Even states that always go one way are showing signs of large point changes. California used to be a 23 point lead for Hillary, now a 32 point lead for Biden. West Virginia was a 32 point lead for Trump, now only a 19 point lead. It's very obvious that Biden is just more popular, while Trump's latest blunders have made him a lot less popular than 2016.
    2
  12. For what?
    2
  13.  @dthrust9037  So you think the president controls global oil prices? Or that US oil companies aren't benefiting massively off the price increases?
    2
  14. The way he keeps campaigning you could have fooled me.
    2
  15. They didn't approve the booster, they approved the first 2 jabs.
    2
  16.  @Epofapent  OANN. Facts are blatantly misrepresented and mostly false. The truth is only about 50 jobs. There are another 11,000 or so that would be out of work, but those are in connection with the construction of the pipeline, not the ongoing maintenance of it. As soon as the pipeline is finished they lose their jobs anyway. The region would see no long-term economic impact. The project threatens the environment in the areas it passes through, including the water supply for 2 Native American communities who were already suing over the construction as it threatened their water supply, subverting previously agreed upon treaties. Oil prices are also about half what they were when the pipeline was originally proposed, and went negative not that long ago due to covid. Finishing it won't even be cost effective in the long term.
    2
  17. Honestly, if you can call this hateful, and not the 2 hour speech Trump just did, then you're full of it.
    2
  18.  @zippidisx2749  Since not wearing a seatbelt is a crime in many places, you can literally lose your job for not wearing one. They are also spending money on the signs you see telling you to wear one. Are you saying Trump rushed the vaccines for political reasons?
    2
  19.  @jakestarr4718  "But its all about safety right? A super safe and thoroughly tested synthetic rna vaccine" Exactly, glad we agree. Thanks Jake.
    2
  20. No vaccines are held liable. They released it early under EUA because they considered withholding it unethical.
    2
  21. @TRIPESKA Music Group Ignorance. This "concoction" is the most simple vaccine ever created. If you're that worried take a more "traditional" version like J&J.
    2
  22.  @KB-ke3fi  They actually said don't stop believin'.....it's the name of the song. How do you get that wrong? Seriously, is this the level of fact checking that goes into people that think I'm the crazy one?
    2
  23.  @mariaflores7852  Florida is a shithole.
    2
  24.  @Andywmm9  Right now yes, because they had the worst Delta surge in the country.
    2
  25.  @profusionlifetv7183  So not the party trying to restrict human rights 4, 5, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28 and 30?
    1
  26.  @wendydaniels1466  But it had 95% against Alpha, and still reduces symptoms from Delta.
    1
  27. It really isn't. Inflation was higher this time last year.
    1
  28. They're literally waiting on Republicans. Republicans even voted to stop the bill even being debated in the Senate.
    1
  29.  @ronniemoore9289  So you're saying the failings of the ability of the federal government to provide basic needs to their citizens should be placed on Biden's doorstep for promising that we will get aid out, and not Republicans for failing to approve that aid that will support average to low-income Americans? Interesting take. Do you also blame cops for saying that they are working to drop crime in your area and your house gets robbed, and not the burglars robbing you?
    1
  30.  @tuppersdad  You mean the one that already went to court and lost 59 times?
    1
  31. It actually doesn't. The senate is swinging left.
    1
  32.  @suzannalytle2758  Good job it does all those things then. Also has small business loans and grants, SNAP benefits extensions, vaccine distributions, FEMA Disaster Relief Fund funding, school funding, college funding, child care assistance, senior food assistance, mortgage assistance, WIC program funding, COBRA subsidies, child tax credit expansions and ACA premium tax credits.
    1
  33. Why would the military go to so much effort to get something that you claim doesn't work?
    1
  34. That don't work.
    1
  35. You can't be serious.
    1
  36. Knowing Texas, probably theft. Just open a few car doors and you'll get a gun in under an hour.
    1
  37.  @keepinghealthy3332  According to who?
    1
  38.  @keepinghealthy3332  8 months is the time between EUA and now, not how long it was in development total. They started developing it months before the EUA, meaning it has been tested for over a year. Their clinical trial alone started almost 14 months ago. They were also allowed to run concurrent testing. Before the clinical trials cellular and animal trials took place over the course of 3 months, pushing total development time to 17 months. These also overlapped considerably due to Operation Warp Speed. This is not an unreasonable amount of time considering the overlapping testing and huge number of people in the clinical trial. Vaccines also don't need stage 4 trials as we aren't giving the vaccines to unhealthy people, but to people not yet infected. Usually clinical trails for new medications take so long because the testing pool is expanded several times, putting clinical trials into 4 separate phases. They practically leapt to stage 4 trails, cutting of years of clinicals. Then they skipped stage 4 all together, saving years of work. For reference, mumps took 4 years to develop, and that was in the 60s without modern technology, massive bursts of funding and an immediate need.
    1
  39.  @keepinghealthy3332  Which part is fake? Pfizer were already doing trials in July 2020 and started their 42K person trial in October. They have been developing and testing this for over 17 months. What is there to dispute?
    1
  40.  @keepinghealthy3332  It was DESIGNED in a few hours, not created. The designer looked at the problem and decided how to create a vaccine in a short space of time. Actually creating it took weeks, testing took a few months. Who ever said vaccines take 10 years? Again, mumps was 4 years, and that was without modern technology, FDA acceleration or billions in funding, with millions on man hours. They had a clinical trial running for 2 months covering 21K vaccinated people for starters, as well as the numerous other tests they did before hand. Stop spreading fake news.
    1
  41.  @keepinghealthy3332  No, it was designed, as in on paper. They hadn't actually tried to create anything yet.
    1
  42. Are you?
    1
  43.  @OneTouchShort  The 9% figure you are quoting is from the December omnibus bill, not the most recent stimulus package, which actually lands around the 20% mark for stimulus checks. They are also expanding unemployment and SNAP benefits. 300 billion would not fund $3000 stimulus checks, not even close. You would need over 800 billion to cover that given the current criteria for the checks.
    1
  44.  @Soccerrockker6  The subway is also fully funded as of several weeks ago and the supposed funds that would go to it are actually general transportation funds of the whole country, and would not be enough to cover 2% of the highspeed rail tunnel in California.
    1
  45. Not exactly surprising given how traitorous Republicans have become in recent years.
    1
  46. Biden stopped specific construction projects that would only waste the country money. Claiming that these jobs were worthwhile enough to keep when they could easily spend the money on a different project and make just as many jobs is dishonest. The pipeline was also illegal as it crossed water sources for native lands, breaking our treaties with them, and pointless. The wall was even worse, ineffective, dangerous to the environment and a waste of money, money which was stolen form the Pentagon. Biden suspended an order that may have reduced insulin prices so it could be reviewed. The running consensus is that the rule would do nothing to drop prices. Trans athletes lose their hormone edge around the 2 year mark with hormone therapy. Sports will not be destroyed because of this. The US is still energy independent. This will only change if oil usage increases or production decreases. I predict usage will increase more and more over time with more people going back to work and traveling more, but we'll see. Building a pipeline doesn't make us more or less energy independent. The US has been producing a larger and larger percentage of its own energy since Bush Jr's second term. They're also looking to invest $40 billion per year, more than 20 times the investment of the pipeline, to creating more renewable energy jobs and sources. This will create jobs while also making the US more energy independent. Trump broke agreements with Iran and killed one of their military officers. What exactly has Biden done that you disapprove of in the region? He signed EOs because we are in the middle of a pandemic, nothing productive had been done in 4 years with the increased migrants coming to the US from central America and nothing has been done to fight climate change in 4 years either. God forbid we have a president willing to actually fight this stuff.
    1
  47. Try telling Trump that with all his public appearances.
    1
  48.  @mrpickles3454  I never said otherwise. I said the long-term employment benefits of the pipeline only amount to 50 jobs, some of which may be in Canada.
    1
  49. That's not what CRT means.
    1
  50.  @ethanbailey3354  It's just the idea that racial inequality is due to circumstances, not anything genetic.
    1
  51.  @ethanbailey3354  In part, sure. It expands pretty far, but the core idea is that inequality is from racial disadvantages.
    1
  52.  @dthrust9037  Got it. So fascism is fine as long as it benefits you personally.
    1
  53.  @dthrust9037  Nobody in government forced anyone to lose their jobs. Decisions were at the choice of the employers.
    1
  54.  @dthrust9037  Lol, no. What revisionist history is this? Only federal employees had to either vaccinate or test by government order. Employers were all voluntary.
    1
  55.  @dthrust9037  Again, a mandate that applies to city employees and, in their case, sports players for teams that represent the city. I'm surprised you're so anti-vaccine considering the massive outbreaks in the NBA in the early days, and the dramatic risk of heart failure from it.
    1
  56.  @dthrust9037  Never remember indeed. You really don't have a clue do you? If you want to shoot yourself in the foot then by all means do so, but don't pretend you have any justification for such a pathetic stance. We get it, you have immigrants and are upset over not being allowed to put other people in danger. It's a bizarre thing to be upset about, but you obviously aren't exactly rational.
    1
  57.  @jakestarr4718  I can, I just thought the better of you. Vaccines are older than seatbelts sooo....
    1
  58. @Voice Guy Or Trump cheated to even get 74 mil (not 75). Maybe he lost way harder than the numbers are showing because he cheated, then spent so long trying to prove fraud because he knew there was some there, because he's the one that did it.
    1
  59.  @BillyTheKidder  Why not. You claim Biden cheated to get votes. Maybe Trump was the cheat all along.
    1
  60.  @roo2221  If only there were a reason for people not to gather in large groups.....
    1
  61.  @BillyTheKidder  The 3am jump in votes was from them reporting votes en masse. They count them then update the numbers. This has been debunked by both Democrat's and Republicans present at the count. Maybe states did flip for Trump. Maybe he actually lost Florida but cheated for the win there, like he tried to in Georgia when he called the governor and asked him to "find" the exact number of votes he needed to win. Pretty sure people voted for Trump while not openly supporting him at a far higher rate given his abysmal approval rating. Maybe Biden supporters don't feel the need to fly a flag, but that hardly makes them pansies. You can represent an ideal without flags.
    1
  62.  @BillyTheKidder  "which as it happens was being told by a Biden voter that they were “scared of retaliation,” or in other words pansies." Sounds smart to me, as Trump voters tried to kidnap congress and killed a cop. "rather I understand the whole game is set up so it can be rigged by the two private organizations that run the show." Well sure. The Senate and the Electoral College should simply not work the way they do. They are completely undemocratic, as is the two-party system and gerrymandering. "It all doesn’t make sense, but most especially thinking the ‘loser’ rigged ‘the game.’" Neither does thinking the winner did. You have to go off the info provided. Especially when Trump has far more instances of attempting to rig the election, such as: Removing mail sorting machines from post office facilities months before the elections. Calling the Governor of Georgia to try and get him to "find" votes. Asking his supporters to stand up and "stop the count" of "illegal" votes. Trying to convince electoral college members to subvert their states. Convincing his supporters to storm the Capitol building to stop the confirmation of the Electoral College vote, even calling for Mike Pence's head and building a gallows. So I was in fact playing devil's advocate at your claim that the election was fishy. Well, more being obtuse actually. The truth is, Trump tried to cheat, and failed.
    1
  63.  YouTubeSucks AfatOne  it's really not. He was literally elected.
    1
  64.  @BillyTheKidder  You would be correct, assuming that was the only case of the right being violent, but there have been multiple instances of the right politically attacking the left. Take Charlottesville. Some white supremist drove his car through anti-Unite the Right protesters, killing 1 and injuring 28. These attacks are not uncommon, and the rhetoric of Trump's supporters in the last 12 years has only been increasing. "in which case arguing one party is better than another should seem ridiculous." Not really. Just because you have to choose between 2 things, doesn't make those things the same. For example: your choice of sandwich filling is Nutella or literal dog shit I found on the front lawn. Still 2 options, they even look similar, but obviously they are very different. I created that narrative to your response that the election results were fishy. They weren't, Biden won, and arguing Biden cheated is even less nonsensical than arguing Trump cheated. At least one side has the ability to show that the candidate at least attempted to cheat. Unless of course your comment was offhand and has nothing to do with a claim of cheating, which makes it a meaningless statement. You claim Biden cheated. Can you name some instances of his cheating?
    1
  65.  @BillyTheKidder  Your last comment said they rig the game, they cheat. So did Biden cheat or not. Moreover, did he cheat the system, or did he cheat within the system? Trump definitely tried the former, and partially succeeded. I agree that reasons fornnot wanting to shout your candidate from the rooftops are generally more personal. My point what that incidents like Charlottesville, various right wing shootings, the attack on the Capitol and other situations like that are just points in a huge web of various instances and rhetoric pushed by the right over the last 12 years. I would also point to the nationalistic style of support very common on the right, that requires a huge amount of chest thumping, something less nationalistic people tend to steer away from. You call it cowardice, I personally call the signs unnecessary. As for the sandwiches, it really doesn't matter what you consider either side, as long as you understand that a choice between 2 is not automatically a choice between 1.
    1
  66.  @BillyTheKidder  The historical evidence is that candidates with a more extreme following tend to attract people with more extreme beliefs and more extreme actions to fit those beliefs, such as covering your house in 20 Trump flags or flying the confederate battle flag. Biden supporters tend to steer away from such blatant displays of nationalism and what essentially amounts to thumping your chest like a gorilla to prove your point. They voted rather than shouted, and it worked. If you really want more examples I can give them, but arguing against it due to an insufficient number of points being made simply because you determined it so doesn't really help you case. Even if these were the only 2 newsworthy examples, it wouldn't really change much. But sure, by all means. I would like to preface this with the fact that Right-wing extremists perpetrated two thirds of the attacks and plots in the United States in 2019 and over 90 percent between January 1 and May 8, 2020. El Paso Walmart shooting 2020 boogaloo killings Kenosha protest shooting Poway synagogue shooting Jeffersontown Kroger shooting Pittsburgh synagogue shooting Planned parenthood shooting Portland train attack Charleston church shooting LAX shooting Attack on Pennsylvania State Police barracks 2018 mail bombing attempts These are just the public attacks in the name of right wing ideals. This says nothing for the hundreds of videos and actions of right wing supporters calling for action: Trump tweeted a video that included the statement "the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat" Fox News claiming that "All the Democrats have is lying and deception" Dinesh D'Souza on Larry King claiming that the Democratic left are fascists Trump proclaiming that only his supporters are true American patriots Numerous videos questions and attacking Colin Kaepernick as a thug Numerous videos of people being shot, choked and beaten by the police without repercussions Militia groups actively preparing for civil war in the lead up to the 2020 election Increased KKK signups and marches The direct attacks and lies about Obama including: Calling him a Muslim and saying he swore in on a Quran Claiming he was born in Kenya Saying he is the literal coming of the anti-christ Calling him Satan Trump co-chair wishing death on Obama Syracuse "hang Obama" threats Warning ISIS of incoming airstrikes before they happened Failed to stockpile ventilators Obama Foundation owns mail-in ballot printers Obama's full name means COVID (seriously, these are just bizarre) The Capitol attack was just a culmination of years of rhetoric coming crashing down as Trump supporters angrily reach stage 2 of their grief journey. They probably won't get much past that either. Add to all of this the fact that conservative gun ownership, violence and terrorism are all increasing, and have been increasing for over a decade, at a steady rate. Rhetoric from these conservative groups has been growing steadily. The silent majority is a thing and they voted accordingly. Also, again, not that this matters, as the absence of what you consider to be an appropriate number of examples is not indicative of there being no issue.
    1
  67.  @thebigcheese606  Because red states are doing the worst both economically and from covid, and usually get the most federal government funding.
    1
  68. The person shot was feet away from members of Congress and ignoring a lawful order. Trying to overthrow the government is no joke. Biden has actually mentioned multiple accomplishments, but you just haven't been listening.
    1
  69.  @Evansteven244  The gates were not open. The video shows her physical location, which was feet away from members of Congress. She also broke a window and was leading a huge group through a barricade.
    1
  70.  @Evansteven244  Guns and other weapons were present, you can't know if she has a weapon, and the mob behind her make the situation completely different. But at least you admit your BS about the gates being open is a joke since the gates were smashed down, and she was breaking through a barricade.
    1
  71.  @Evansteven244  It does change the matter, as does the mob. The video is online, how much more public do you need?
    1
  72.  @Evansteven244  Yes, I'm sure a different camera angle is all you need to get justice for that seditious traitor. Wonder why the family haven't bothered trying to get any sort of justice?
    1
  73.  @Evansteven244  No, it doesn't. Thanks for playing though.
    1
  74.  @Evansteven244  So just repeating the same lies.
    1
  75.  @Evansteven244  I think the fact that they stormed the Capitol is more than enough reason for the FBI to keep a watch on them. Nobody was ushered in.
    1
  76.  @Evansteven244  The areas that were opened were to either to redirect seditionists, or to abandon an area where the police were being flanked. Many videos are shot from the mob, behind the police lines, showing the strategic movements. The most common of which was the barricade that was removed allowing the mob through, but again the cops were already surrounded and the video is shot from behind.
    1
  77. It helps that he very obviously broke the law.
    1
  78. Price increases are global. Crime increased during the pandemic long before Biden took office. The FBI searched Trump's home and found boxes of illegal documents. Anything else?
    1
  79.  @jakeglenn2246  Not sure why you're laughing. It's an mRNA vaccine that needs to be frozen in a -80. After being defrosted it cannot be refrozen and has a 5 day shelf life. Not sure why that's a difficult concept.
    1
  80. ​ @jakeglenn2246  > "Facebook Co- founder(“World Economic Forum”) , Bill Gates , Fauci and Big pharma planned C 19 and removed Trump from office. Interesting claim. Got any evidence for that? Honestly, you think that they started a virus, in China of all places, and spread it all over the world, just to prove Trump is incompetent? Even if you are correct all Trump had to do was not be incompetent. >Why wasn’t the white house and GOP senators invited to event 201? Because at every turn they have been working to undermine the whole pandemic response. >Why weren’t the American people allowed to attend? Which American people? American people were there. >Which Big pharma reps were there and why? Probably the ones producing the vaccine. >Why was the CIA and NSA there? Why wasn’t Trump notified? These are contradictory. I'm sure Trump was notified and has the CIA and NSA acting on his behalf, or he skipped that briefing like he always does. Either way. >John Hopkins was the organization that also tracked and reported on the C19 actual event!!! Correct. I'm glad they were there since they obviously know the most about all of this. >The American people have NOT elected Gates, Fauci, Big pharma or John Hopkins or the CDC to direct our healthcare. Well, sort of. The CDC head is appointed by the president, who is elected. The rest of them were hosting a private event and invited officials, who decided it would be a good idea. Gates, Johns Hopkins and the rest have no obligation to help people, but maybe they aren't complete sacks of shit like Trump. Gates for instance donated billion upon billions around the world to help people, yet you think he is somehow orchestrating a pandemic just to get at Trump? >Why is Roxanne S. Austin- Verizon BOD also on BOD of big pharma? Why not? Maybe because they know a thing or two about business and can provide a unique approach that more pharmaceutically driven individuals cannot? Here's an idea. If Trump and his personal team are being attacked so hard, why don't they do some investigating and prove it? They appointed judges and had the head of the department of justice on their side, and found literally nothing. No lawsuits, no trials, no evidence. Also, are you saying the virus is fake or the vaccine. Wouldn't the vaccine still be a good thing?
    1
  81. No chance. They caught multiple people who are well known Trump supporters who went to all of his rallies.
    1
  82. ​ Milly Willy  "actually there are plenty of reports on VAERS that say the men vaccines do cause clots." Not sure which vaccine you are referring to here, but that's not how VAERS works. VAERS reports are all possible side effects, regardless of whether they were actually caused by the vaccines or not. Moreover, if you check the actual data, which you can download for free, you'll find that complaints of clots are almost exclusively related to J&J, and Moderna and Pfizer complaints fall very much into usual thresholds. In fact back in May the CDC followed up on all the VAERS reports of clots and found that none of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine recipient claims of clots were founded. All 28 cases came from J&J. However, even in J&J this is far lower than the blood clot rate for covid, with is around 39 per million. J&J is more like 4 per million. "no. Your thinking involves no logic whatsoever. Your health is not my responsibility." How selfish. I'm sorry that you feel the need to actively endanger those around you to fuel your own self importance, especially those incapable of being vaccinated. Imagine how miserable it must be to be immunocompromised and unable to go outside because of people like you.
    1
  83.  @Sara-he4dn  That happened by increasing the national debt by trillions. Trump lowered taxes and increased spending to inflate the market temporarily. It's a dangerous and unsustainable growth model that costs the taxpayers in the long run. Bush did the exact same thing, and look what happened at the end of his presidency. COVID just accelerated the inevitable under Trump.
    1
  84. On Sunday night, the FBI issued a statement calling the ordeal “a terrorism-related matter, in which the Jewish community was targeted.” The agency said the Joint Terrorism Task Force is investigating. Try again.
    1
  85.  @bad74maverick1  Almost as if arresting the guy and questioning everyone allowed them to learn more. Amazing right? God you're a joke.
    1
  86. Yes we are.
    1
  87.  @janepeterson40  We're both.
    1
  88.  @janepeterson40  Ruining it how? Can you be specific?
    1
  89.  @janepeterson40  The border is still closed. In fact the number of people being caught is exceptionally high, meaning we are catching them. Biden also got Mexico to pay for $1.5 billion in border security. Democrats have never been against border security, they just knew that a massive wall was stupid, costly, ineffective and impossible to maintain. Taxes are unchanged, unless of course you're a high earner. The department of education manages its own budget and can forgive loans. All that will do is lower their own future earnings, but they still make a profit with the high interest rates they have. Not sure what your issue is with Ukraine. We are supporting our allies. After 20 years in Afghanistan I thought you would be happy about helping in a war that actually means something.
    1
  90. They've been waiting on Republicans this whole time. They had to pass the bill through reconciliation because Republicans in the Senate refused to approve it. The process goes through multiple committees and takes months.
    1
  91. @TRIPESKA Music Group Nope. I've reviewed all the evidence, the vaccines are far safer than covid.
    1
  92. @TRIPESKA Music Group What a ridiculous hurdle considering pharma companies are the ones making the vaccines and governments are the ones reviewing them as well as measuring the covid numbers, but yes, there have been independent papers published in the likes of Nature and BMJ that have reviewed the impact independently.
    1
  93.  @cjsteele9594  Have you ever done some fighting in southern Africa, maybe in Rhodesia?
    1
  94.  @smetheny1337  Well it is. Just RNA and fats, that's it. Not adjuvants. Yes, vector vaccines, which have been around 50 years and include the TB vax. They are both vaccines and the definition was clarified, it never changed meaning.
    1
  95.  @saltyzu8412  Until it wears off. I've known multiple people who caught covid twice.
    1
  96.  @smetheny1337  Nope. They just removed the term immunity. No vaccines have ever guaranteed immunity for 100% of the people taking them, and flu shots are the best example of this. Even the old shingles vax was only 50% effective. Nothing about efficacy or immunogenicity applies here. The meaning behind the definition is unchanged since it was always applied the way it currently reads.
    1