Comments by "Hobbs" (@hobbso8508) on "Pfizer Covid Vaccine: The Difference Between Emergency, Full Authorization" video.

  1. Nope. Vaccines are all protected. You need to apply for vaccine injury compensation.
    15
  2.  @robotron17  Well it is manageable, in that the inflammation fades with no long term damage in a few months. Not so lucky if you catch covid though, as covid related myocarditis is generally much more serious.
    9
  3.  @robotron17  Over a year. The first clinical trial was in July 2020 and was 21K people. Long-term effects also usually manifest pretty short term, especially considering the vaccine is completely gone from the system in 2 weeks.
    5
  4. That can happen when you speed the process up by giving it to over a hundred million Americans. The initial clinical trial also started over a year ago.
    4
  5.  @robotron17  What's it like to know nothing?
    4
  6. Yes, the hospital near me checks for flu at the same time as covid.
    3
  7. The mRNA vaccines haven't been shown to cause any clotting issues though.
    3
  8.  @jackgoff6043  "Yes I do. Evidently you do not." Okay, then please let me know which part of the process Pfizer didn't complete. Why don't you start by listing out the normal process by which drugs are approved and we can go from there. "It takes over $2.6 billion for a manufacturer to get a new drug from the laboratory onto the pharmacy shelf" And? Pfizer spent about a billion more than this. "What happens during this time period to be sure that the drug you pick up at the pharmacy is safe and effective?" Now you're just reforming my question and asking it back at me.
    3
  9.  @alexjara305  Go back and read the full quote you dummy: "Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with OLD STRAINS detected between March-April 2020."
    2
  10.  @crazydaizy915  Yes, and if you do your research you'll see that vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is not linked to the mRNA vaccines, but instead the J&J live virus and the AstraZeneca adenovirus vaccines. The rates for these are also exceptionally low, and in all honesty you're 10 times more likely to see thrombosis in covid patients. You also can't just say "heart muscle" on it's own. What about the heart muscle? And no, it does not "destroy the function of your T cells" Where do you get this crap?
    2
  11. It started getting tested 17 months ago. 8 months is just the time between EUA and full approval. It had already had 9 months of testing before it got EUA.
    2
  12.  @jackgoff6043  Which part of the approval process did they not do correctly? I've heard a lot of people saying it was rushed, but no indication as to HOW it was rushed. Mind being a bit more specific?
    2
  13.  @jackgoff6043  Approval isn't based on time, it's based on meeting a set of criteria. Which criteria were not met. Better yet, why do you think they were able to accelerate this process? Do you even know what the process is?
    2
  14.  @jackgoff6043  Take your time Jack, whenever you're ready. Want me to start you off?
    2
  15. It's been a year though.
    2
  16. @Homer Simpson 1 year is long-term for something that only hangs around for 2 weeks.
    2
  17.  @jackgoff6043  That's a no then. Shame really, I thought you would have the wherewithal to actually challenge your illogical opinion, but apparently you can't reason someone out of something they didn't reason themselves into. Cheers Jack for wasting both our time.
    1
  18.  @jackgoff6043  You're the one leaving the conversation after failing to justify your position. Sounds like you're going back to your safe space because of your lack of education. If those were both projections I dread to think why you keep calling me princess. You even capitalised this this time, I guess you think a lot of yourself. Enjoy playing dress up in your safe space Jack. When you're ready to have a real conversation about FDA approval let me know.
    1
  19.  @brandona.deimel5155  They saw it coming and hedged their bets. People had seen an even like this coming for years, and preparing a vaccine early is the only way to get to market. The co-founder of BioNTech designed the Pfizer vaccine in an afternoon on the 25th of January 2020. They made an agreement with Pfizer, and created the physical vaccine in a few weeks. Due to the simplicity of the vaccine the turnaround time was easy to keep short. From there they were allowed by the FDA to do simultaneous pre-clinical trials, meaning they were doing cellular and animal testing at the same time. They were also putting billions behind the endeavour, allowing them to put hundreds of people on the task. Usually drug trials are done by a couple of scientists slowing working through the steps over years, but with the urgency they used massive funding to accelerate the testing, running hundreds and hundreds of plates a day knowing they would be at the front of the FDA queue. By late April they already had clinical trial approval, with the phase 1/2 trials (combining them for speed) getting their first dose on the 23th of April and running until the 22nd of May. Recipients were reviewed over the course of 6 months for side effects, but with no immediate problems they started their phase 2/3 clinicals (also combined) in 4 different countries, recruiting thousands as early as July and running to November. EUA came through in December, and by them the earliest injection had been over 8 months ago, far past the 6 month threshold set on long-term side effects by the FDA given the urgency. In February they started phase 3 trials on adolescents aged 12-15 and pregnant women at 24-32 weeks. Now that it is fully approved the earliest injection was around 16 months ago. Earliest largescale trial was 14 months ago. They were testing it on cells and animals around 18 months ago.
    1
  20.  @jackgoff6043  I'm not copying you Jack, I'm showing you why you are projecting the parts of yourself that you hate the most onto people you disagree with is just a defense mechanism. Meanwhile, if you want a summary of what you should have written it's in my other comment.
    1
  21. @Homer Simpson Of course it made it past the animal trials, why do you think they released it. Use. Critical. Thinking.
    1
  22.  @catvideos3249  Good point, it obviously works.
    1
  23.  @erictuffelmire6826  Mind linking me to that definition?
    1
  24.  @susantroupe9341  Wouldn't work. Adverse events get reported to the FDA.
    1
  25.  @vikinglife6316  I'm actually very familiar with Myocarditis. What part are you interested in learning more about?
    1
  26. It's been a year since the first people took it actually.
    1