Comments by "Hobbs" (@hobbso8508) on "Dr. Fauci, White House Task Force Discuss Booster Shots At COVID-19 Press Briefing" video.

  1.  @whatitis2327  I'm sorry you don't understand scientific research on fly patterns and parasitic migration.
    1
  2.  @spartanboxing1  Not an experiment, they approved it.
    1
  3.  @spartanboxing1  Nope, fully approved. Pulling claims out of your arse isn't going to make it take longer. They threw money at it and got authorisation to run tests concurrently. They put more into this in a year than other drugs do in their entire development. They also don't need to do final trial phases because it's a vax not some other drug. They followed the rules, jumped all the hurdles and got approval.
    1
  4.  @spartanboxing1  That's not how FDA approval works. They don't need a chief to approve new drugs.
    1
  5.  @spartanboxing1  Because I understand how the FDA works. Okay dude, enjoy not understanding things. Bet you think learning is communism.
    1
  6.  @spartanboxing1  It's not experimental, it has full approval. Fauci and his wife have literally no stake in the approval. FDA chief does not need to sign off on approvals. The reason we need boosters is due to waning, which happens with natural immunity as well. They also do protect people, stopping both infection and serious illness. I'm more worries about the continuing spread of a disease that we already know can mutate and reinfect people. Surely stopping the spread is more important than whatever weird grudge you have against the FDA. Cold showers? What? Finally signing off with a misspelled slogan from Twitter. Maybe just stick to Twitter next time, or talk about your actual expertise in boxing and shipping, rather than trying to understand the FDA, which you obviously don't.
    1
  7. ​ @spartanboxing1  Here I'll do you a favour. I'll breakdown all that crazy you just posted just this once, but then on you're on your own. "I have all the NIH emails to Fauci" The emails that were discussions on the best course of action before they had proper evidence and have nothing to do with public announcements, and were instead a process that led them to their final conclusions? Good for you, what about them? "you just admitted to a flawed product unleashed to the public" Flawed for what? It nailed the wild type variant on the head, and is even managing to battle delta, which it was never designed to do. Infections and deaths are sharply reduced in areas with more vaxed. "the excuse will be that there was no FDA chief signing off on it" For the last time, the FDA does not require a chief to sign off on things. FDA approval happens at a much lower lever on a much mroe regular basis. "The point of being healthy and doing things humans have done in the past to improve immunity is a joke to you because you're obviously weaker." Some of the things you said are a joke. How is taking cold showers supposed to boost immunity? And sure, being healthy is a good start, but sometimes you just can't help but be unhealthy, and sometimes the virus hits you in ways that you can't control. "The virus was germ warfare unleashed on the public as the "insurance plan" the cabal needed to subdue and apprehend freedom." Baseless assumptions. Next. "The virus was made deadlier by using human genome rats and to continually reinject the surviving rats to evolve the Covid 19 virus." You're just pointing out that your own theory means that natural immunity is useless, if they were "continually reinjected" then wouldn't natural immunity stop working if it still killed these rats? Even your unsupported claims can be debunked so easily. "An Atlanta zoo keeper that was vaxxed infected the gorillas there." K.....And? Are you saying this would not have happened if he wasn't vaxed? "You keep arguing that the vax is safe because you know the procedure. There are two procedures now, the regular procedure and the "emergency" procedure." Nope, 1 procedure, they just accelerated it. "The emergency procedure has not had any long term studies for full on approval." They concluded that since the spike protein leaves the body in 2 weeks, that 6 months is more than sufficient for a long term analysis of side effects. "You just admitted the FDA board has approved a flawed product capable of evolving into the deadlier virus that Fauci has lied about." It's a spike protein, it can't evolve. "Glad it's all here, let those that read this decide who's coversation is more truthful." Probably the one that can actually point out all your flaws. Half of what you said is unfounded speculation, and the other half shows a gross misunderstanding of how any of this works.
    1
  8. According to the study they sedated them and put them in the netting for 1 hour to see how many of the 200 flies they released went to either side.
    1
  9.  @calikush0303  You're thinking of the Georgia study. They were testing a vaccine for the parasites that the flies carry. While I haven't seen it substantiated that the vocal cords were removed, this is semi-normal as the sound of the dogs crying upsets all the other dogs, lowering their overall wellbeing even more than removing their vocal cords. Having worked with people who do this kind of work, they absolutely do not enjoy it. It's brutal stuff, and most people don't last too long doing animal studies. It is however necessary, as the parasite they were trying to immunize against is lethal. If successful they could stop what happened to the lab animals from happening to not just hundreds of millions of dogs, such as in North Africa, but also around 120 million people. So you tell me, are the lives of 120 million and countless dogs worth experimenting on a few dozen dogs?
    1
  10. Too many concussions playing sports there champ?
    1