Comments by "Hobbs" (@hobbso8508) on "COVID-19: Study suggests mixing and matching vaccine boosters proves effective" video.

Of course it does. Why are you making stuff up Steve. Does efficacy mean nothing to you? That and the unvaccinated are dying far more frequently. It has a higher efficacy, even against the new variant, than the old shingles has had, and we never stopped calling that a vax. You're just confused by both the ability of the covid cases, while also being confused as to what a vaccine actually is. Not the first time you've been stumped, but here we are again.
1
@stevexyz1173 Requiring everyone to get sick to get immunity results in millions of casualties and tens of millions with long-term organ damage in the US alone. That's if the hospitals don't get overwhelmed. Permanent injury in the form of organ damage happens in 7% of patients.
1
@stevexyz1173 Your "healthy adult" definition excludes people with obesity which is, fun fact, half the country. Your natural antibodies will wear off around the same time as the vaxes do.
1
@stevexyz1173 Israel already tested and found both longer and more stable immunity if people who caught it also got the jabs.
1
@stevexyz1173 Dr. Malone also thinks HIV doesn't cause AIDs so I would pick my battles with that one. Being an expert in mRNA vaccine technology doesn't make you an expert in virology.
1
@stevexyz1173 Studies show that the immunity you are referring to is temporary. I've personally known people who have already had covid 3 times. The 2005 antibodies are not for the same virus and therefore do not perform the same.
1
@stevexyz1173 This also ignores my point about half the country falling into the obesity category alone, along with the obvious overwhelmed state of hospitals under surges, never mind if we just started infecting everyone.
1
@stevexyz1173 Lol. What a joke. Get a grip Steve. His "sources" are countered by basically every group who is actually in the field dealing with this pandemic.
1
@stevexyz1173 Hate to break it to you but shrugging your shoulders and saying "it happens" isn't a valid argument for why we should allow millions of Americans to die.
1
@stevexyz1173 Pathetic. You actually think that allowing millions to die is the solution.
1
@stevexyz1173 Masks work, and you claims that people say they don't are against all the data.
1
@stevexyz1173 They lowered the life expectancy due to covid deaths.
1
@stevexyz1173 The CDC doesn't say that. You're so ignorant.
1
@stevexyz1173 You're right, Republicans care about life the most, right until you're born. They they'll do everything they can to bleed you dry and throw your husk in prison.
1
@stevexyz1173 3 time in a row now you've tried to push the same issue using presuppositions. It's legal for a reason sweetheart. Yet more antiscience from the right.
1
@stevexyz1173 Nobody aborts up to the day of birth. Stop getting your lies from Tucker. That law applies only to non-viable fetuses. They ban abortion after 24 weeks, which is also around the time a fetus first becomes conscious. Beings incapable of being conscious are not legally alive for a reason. But sure, compare a definition we use for turning off life support to justify your views on slavery.
1
@stevexyz1173 Sure thing Steve. Let me know when you have a better definition.
1
@stevexyz1173 Funny you talk about drone strikes when Trump increased drone strikes and sealed the information of those strikes. Now we have less strikes and open information, and you're throwing a fit.
1
@stevexyz1173 So you stick to a topic until it doesn't benefit you. What is your definition of life? Or are you too scared to say? Trump hid strikes so be could selectively praise successful ones while hiding civilian casualties. To argue otherwise is childish.
1
@stevexyz1173 Got it, so you believe that raped women should be forced to have their rapists children.
1