Comments by "Hobbs" (@hobbso8508) on "CDC: Covid deaths on the rise again after weeks of decline" video.

  1.  @mikhailtolstykh4104  You mean the state that locked down and their deaths dropped, then when they relaxed restrictions the infections went up?
    2
  2.  @annawhite1430  AZ only has about 67% protection against the delta variant. You are also far more likely to see the vaccinated walking around, making the chances of getting sick and dying more likely. That being said, according to your own numbers, less than half of the people who caught the delta variant and died had been vaccinated, making it still much safer overall given that 53% of the population are fully vaccinated, and 69% have at least 1 dose. So with a larger population of vaccinated people, and more than enough reasons for them to be more likely to catch covid, they still died less from the virus. Sounds like a success to me.
    1
  3.  @mikhailtolstykh4104  Florida is worse than New York. Their total infection rate is higher over the course of the pandemic.
    1
  4.  @mikhailtolstykh4104  Oh really, then please tell me what their deaths were before and what they are now, because the highest number of deaths India had in a day was 7,374. Yesterday they had 542 deaths. So even if we assume that entire drop was from the use of ivermectin, and not due to the sharp reduction in the number of infected and the use of the MATH+ protocol, that would still only be a drop of 93%, not 97%. This says nothing for survival rate and patient outcomes because, as I already said, they have less people hospitalized as well. It's almost like you pulled these stats from the same dung heap the rest of your ridiculous claims and stats came from.
    1
  5.  @mikhailtolstykh4104  No, it's not splitting hairs, it's giving you a best case scenario and showing how obviously you just made up numbers. As I already said, which you ignored because you're blinded by your indoctrination, this is a best case scenario for you and doesn't take into account the sharp reduction in infections and hospitalizations in this same time period. To make it a bit more clear for you if you look at the infection rates of the prior month due to the amount of time between infection and death, and use a 7 day moving average to account for slight shifts in trends day-to-day, you end up with a much clearer picture. It makes sense that the height of infections match the height of deaths, so for this example we'll use the peak in new infections at the start of May and compare it to the peak of deaths at the start of June. This matched the majority of death trends when reviewing new infections vs deaths. What you'll see in this timeframe is a 7 day moving average of new infections at the peak at the start of May of 414,188 cases. The deaths at the peak around 2 weeks later were 4209. This gives a death rate of almost exactly 1.0162%. If we then transpose the number of new infections over the current deaths using the same 2 week time period we get a number of infections of 46,617, and a number of deaths over the same lag time, we get 542, which is a death rate of 1.1627%, an increase of 14% when compared to the previous time period when there was a peak of infections. So when you actually look at the data, not only are you wrong, you are really really wrong. Deaths in fact increased, and it's far more likely that the introduction of ivermectin was so insignificant it fell between the cracks of standard deviations in a normal distribution. Or, put simply, the death rate increased in India after they switched to your magic drug. Funnily enough they have been trialing ivermectin since December 2020 and haven't included it in the MATH+ protocol for a reason, because there is nothing to suggest that it helps.
    1