Comments by "Goldenhawk583" (@Goldenhawk583) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

@saidbendif2834 sionist
5
@EpicAlcatraz99 During the Hakba, and during unarmed, peaceful protests that has happened over and over during the last 75 years. Israeli soldiers used the palestinians as target practice. Often they would bet on hitting a spesific person, and they often aimed for the knees, destroying that person forever. Civilian Israelis would bring a pocknickbasket and chairs, and go watch this as entertainment. Poor israel:P
5
@orcaluv You are speaking of the Israeli of course.
5
he said it would be preferred, not that it is the option that will work. And it would be preferable, if could have worked, but it was tried and failed.. so while preferable, it is not a realistic option.
4
@EpicAlcatraz99 history m8
4
@orcaluv ,pre like the people 75 years ago, that were living good lives in opeace, should never have let any of it go. Israel never owned gaza, and they never wiill.
4
@Jarimir But its not. One cide is locked in.. the other one holds the key.. being a prisoner is not a cult.
3
@AOLAmericaOnline so, if prisoners in a LOCKED CAMP, share space with other prisoners in the same LOCKED CAMP, they are guilty by default? Hoe many 2 uear old criminals have you seen altely... ffksake
2
and we are supposed to adopt the reference " cis", as if "woman" is not enough.....
2
@akdascholar4824 And you support authorities changing the rules as they wish, wether it is legal or not, as long as they get more of your money. Gotcha. Or ?
2
@MusMasi good question:)
2
@lawrence208 They have agreed to borders agreed on in 67. It is the OTHER side that wants no deal.. and they have admitted that several times.
2
@icemachine79 Good point.. Everything Hamas does seems to venefit who.. Israel.. never the palestinians, they only get more palestinians killed. It is well known that Israel, on several occations have financed or allowed financong to get to Hamas. By now it seems to be clear that Hamas is an Israeli unit, not fighting for Palestine, just pretending to, while they really are creating excuses for Israel to bomb more civilians. But Hamas kills Israelis you might say. True.. but do you really think that Israel is not ready to sacrifice a few of their own, in order to get what they want?
1
@Spitfyre1011 No, lol. I grew up from a girl to a woman, no "cis" there. I am a woman, and transwomen are transwomen, see, plenty difference there to not misunderstand, and no bad words spoken:P
1
@joshbates9015 lol, well, plenty of women out there that doesnt mind being reduced to a lesser woman, Im sure you will find some you like:P
1
@slashandbones13 no it is not,Let the new kinds get new names, I find " transwomen" is a very suitable name , and it it is descriptive in its own right. It is also very easy to knoiw the difference between a woman and a transwoman without being disrespectful to either one.
1
@nerag7459 funny:P How about just keeping "trans" infront of " woman", to make it woman and transwoman. I dont know, are you able to detect the difference in those 2 words.. and yet, no "cis" :P
1
@anmolt3840051 relvant how, when did women change gender to cis?
1
@melgibson7313 kid... right. and you think belittleing and namecalling is an adult way of communicating a disagreement? I dont think I am the child here:P
1
@andromidius so a woman is the same as a woman.. is that what cis means then. By that it follows that " woman" and "ciswoman" are 2 different things, even if they are very similar. If they indeed were one and the same, there would be no need for a prefix. And no, if you are trans than THAT is the definition you should be proud of.. , but it sounds to me like you are ashamed of it, and want to hide behind a word that really is a false description of your true self. Thats kinda transphobic, dont you think? The word " woman" describes a physical, being. One that was born a girl, and grew up to have breasts and a uterus . The word " transwoman" describes a person with a male body and a female disposition. I see nothing wrong with this. I see nothing wrong with being trans, and I see nothing wrong with being woman. Both are valid and complete descriptions of who you are . Now, some girls do grow up without developing all the bodyparts of an adult woman, but being a born a girl is reason enough to say you grow up to be a woman. You were born a boy, I am pretty sure your trans personality did not show itself at birth. It was there, but not detectable until later in life, As I see it,, you should not even want to call yourself just " woman", dismissing the integral part of you that is the male body and all that entails. You also never had a uterus, a period, pms.... you had your own unique experiences growing up. Perhaps that is what is missing, feeling safe and understood as who you are.. a trans woman. And you complain about having to call yourself trans all the fucking time.. would it make sense if I complained about calling myself a woman all the fucking time? In short, you do not come across as being comfortable as a trans woman, but more like a wannabe woman rather than a genuine trans.
1
@Spitfyre1011 if im transphobic for wanting to describe things accurately, then so be it. A woman was born a girl, a transwoman was born a boy. Both can be assholes, and both can be great people. I claim that the idea that the prefix " trans" seems to have negative connotations to the point that people want to deny reality is the real problem. As a woman, if I met a transman that never mentioned he was trans, and we finally got into bed and i found he had female parts.. that would be big slap in the face for me, as I am not atracted to the female body in that way. Now we can no longer be friends sonce he betrayed my trust in a bad way .. If he had told me from the start that he was a transman, we would have had a chance to get along just fine and be great friends.
1
@nerag7459 aww, how cute.. defending newspeak without thinking and then getting ypset that some dont agree, lol. I dont care what you call me.. it wont change what I am:P A woman:P
1
@B03Eastwood remove the cis, and I agree. It like saying " no its not a dog, its a blabla dog.. no such thing as a dog, unless its a transdog, THEY are allowed to be called just "dog"" women are plain women until they decide to label themselves as something else.. like a transwoman. And I agree, no judgement, this is a discussion about definitions, not choices or morals.
1
@B03Eastwood for me? For thousands of years the word " woman" has referred to a certain, biilogical being, the one that is capable of bearing children. Then you have subsets of women, lesbians, transmen etc. At no point will a biological male, EVER become a biolgical female, even with surgery. If you made a clone of that person, it would have a penis, and no uterus, no matter how much the appearance or behavior is feminine and female looking. You guys are redifining what the word " woman" means, to the point that you have to create a new word for a natural woman.. aka cis woman, and you think that is not a problem? I dont mind transpeople, I DO mind them stealing a definition that does not belong to them and never did. Are you saying that all transpeople are dishonest cowards by default then, that they are unable to face their real identity, and have to steal someone elses to even be able look in a mirror? Identity theft is illegal in all other situations... and its a shame that transpeople are so ashamed of who they are that they cant say it out loud, but need to use a fake description of themselves.
1
adblock plus.. they do not block the commercials, they just skip them the moment they start.. and you never need to see them ;)
1
@monoxide4729 I dont pay for utube, and I see no commercials. I agree on shabibo, lol.. he is unbearable.
1
@RationalNon-conformist Israel is an apartheid state, It now has posters of palestinian children with a target on their face. " kill them " the posters say. But you are saying only THOSE women and children matter? If so, move to israel, they have that mindset. Well almost, they are now bombving the very hispital that many of the victims are treated in.. inlike the israeli that deny treatment if you are not a zionist, the palestinians will treat anyone that needs it,
1
good one, and valid when both groups are recognised as humans of some value. What we have here though, is one side that sees everyone but themselves as cattle and slaves.. they are the only humans, the rest, the palestinians, us non zionists.. are just animals.
1
@akdascholar4824 i got the impression that it is "liberalist" to object to a constitution being violated, but since I was not sure, i added the "or? :)
1
2 factions, one against and one for.
1
formal education today will have you obedient and quiet. and that started a long time ago. So saying he quit school does not mean as much as it should. One can keep learning even when not in school.
1
@supermarx No, he has the right to free speech, like everyone else. He has the right to make a fool of himself like everyone else. You are saying that there should be rules for what you can say and think... Like it is in that country they are talking about.. did you really consider that before you made your comment? I can absolutely understand your annoyance tho.
1
@soulknife20 true, just proving that quitting in itself doesnt mean you are smart:)
1
@DRChupacabrah yes he is, and he did it all on his own, Im sure he is proud of himself;)
1
and Peterson seems to have sold out..
1
It would be nice if he is using his show to expose things.. without seeming to mean to do that. I could understand if he works a bit " undercover". We will see.
1
Well then, voting is the game they put in, so the only players allowed to get anywhere are those who sell out to them.
1
@Randy778 words matter. In the first reports.. Israeli were killed, but palestinians died.. see the difference?
1
some people use the trauma of others as a tool. The trauma of the jews in europe started when zio...ism started. This artificial self image of superiority, made them strangers in the communitues they had lived in for a long time. Suddenly the younger ones acted like little kings, and looked down on old friends as if they were dogpoop, Then came the war, the cleansing, all planned, all needed to make jews both unliked and chased, AND scared and fearing for their lives, so that they would move. This trauma was created, not ignored.
1
Just goes to prove that color doesnt matter. Idiots are all over the place. Greetings from a white woman. Best wishes.
1
One would think so, and atrocities did happen to jews.. But why? Because the jews had made themselves pretty unbearable as neighbours. They treted others badly, cheated in buisiness and acted as if everyone else was beneath them ( naot ell jews ofc, but enough to make it seem so). Why? Because of zionism.. and for a zionist, acting that way to other people is fine, because other peiple are goyim, cattle, slaves to zionists. The world wanted the zionists gone, and treating them like crap would make them easy to move. Then they made israel. The leaders of israel were never opressed, they negotiated this, they wanted a place to use . and israel became that place. They never wanted peace, they want land and power.. and the first to go was palestinians. Now they proved more resiliant than the jews ever was, they are still here, still hanging on and not running like the jews did. I get what you mean, but it was never like that.
1
@danwelterweight4137 First, you are right, Israel will never stop, since they do not think its anything wrong in killing " animals" but here is my take on what whas said: He said he would prefer peaceful protes and civilian disobecience. Prefer.. Would we not all prefer it to be peaceful? That the worst things thrown are angry words? He did NOT say that this is the only option though.. and he then went on to ask " how much provocation does it take"... It seemed ( to me atleast) that he left the option of armed retaliation against Israel quite open.. understandable, even righteous.. just not preffered., What I wish for is this: That Israeli supporters, the ordinary people, and politicians that think " poor jews" about Israel.. wake up and realize, that when Israel describes the people of gaza as animals.. it is not because they live in Gaza.. it is not because they are arabs or muslims. It is because they are NOT zionist jews. That would make 99% of supporters into animals too.. as killable and as despised as anyone living in Gaza. Most people would not support someone who sees them as shit... they just need to see that that is what is true. If they did, all support Israel has would fall away in an instant.
1
Please use the phraze " Occupier", in your case they were white.. but their color did not decide, their culture did, and it has changed.
1
@thewhitefalcon8539 They did though. German, nazi military DID go with the jews as they were jews themselves and got fired from their ranks as time went on during the nazi regime and the nazu , ant jew mindset took hold.
1
uhm.., one can absolitely comment on something someone else has said, without that person being there. Shapiro can defend himself all he wants later.
1
@ByGraceThroughFaith777 Exactly,, uts a reaction, noithing more, and with that rant Shapiro came with.. he should be locked up.
1
@jameshw9751 every day they suffer atroceties. Growing upo in a prison is not ok, even when its reasonably peaceful, It is still a prison, and people will still wwant the freedo, to live in peace withoyut the enemy controlling their food, water and electricity.
1
@stevensica89 no, well, for some its true, for others it becomes something they woiuldnt do therir worst enemy. Do not forget the zionist doctrine, only zionist jews are humans, the rest ( incliding me and probablu you), are goyim, cattle, nothing of value and we have no rights. A lot of military germans were among the first ones to move to Israel, jews yes, but also nazis from the start.
1