Comments by "Goldenhawk583" (@Goldenhawk583) on "The Villains" channel.

@braindetritus I am 60. If I am anything like my grandparents on both sides, I have about 30 years left. Waithing for death for a third of my life sounds utterly depressing. How about living the life you have in stead?
5
@braindetritus good, lol:)
3
@FrogEnjoyer218 it is a maga type, clearly . Every assumption it makes is clearly based in its own percieved world reality, not actual reality.
1
@Takieroulecheval-r8v No, she is trying to help innocent people that are suspected ( wrongfully), of murder. What do you prefer, murderers possibly going free a bit longer, or innocent people in prison for life, or maybe on death row ( it has happened), for crimes they did not commit?
1
@aneececolt and you can do that with a lawyer present. Having a lawyer does not mean you never talk to cops. What it means is.. they cant coerce you ( an innocent), to admit to doing something you never did, just by using unfortunate wording, or by threatening you. The lawyer will make sure you stay safe during interrogation... do you not want to be safe?
1
@aneececolt best for those that want you convicted, yes, not best for the killer.
1
@verabolton you can be angry, and at the same time be trying to calm yourself down..
1
@djmcc83 I do not question that you knew people would be sad if you killed someone, or that you would go to jail for it, But I do question the level of your comprehension, Understanding the big picture is not the same as understanding the finer print.
1
@djmcc83 I am not arguing against the consequence itself. I am saying that young people can not be expected to understand the wider implications of said consequence until their brains are fully formed, Do you see the difference? I get annoyed when people claim " they KNEW what the consequence was", no , they really did not.. but it does not mean they should get off lighter if the crime is that terrible. Most young people do not commit such crimes, not because they have a better understanding, but because their sense of right and wrong is a lot stronger and they are better at self regulating their actions. A lot of criminals may well know something is seen as "wrong", and still have no clue WHY it is wrong. When that is the case, they will also have much less restraint against doing this wrong.
1
Most other countries that are comparable , has a 2 to 3 year education to become police. And if a budding police officer cant be bothered with actual education, they have no good reason to be a cop anyway. Yes, pay could be better, but you either want to be a cop for the right reasons, or you dont. If you do it for the money, it is the wrong reason.
1
@4Moth2Mellow0 So, a murder happens where the killer is not obvious.. who will do the research needed? Who will do the tests and collect evidence? In your scenario, one of 2 will happen. Some person will be accused and hung, it may or may not be the culprit, OR, noone bothers and the killer goes free.
1
Yes, victims really need to take responsibility.
1
the eye? it is the thoughts in his mind that causes him to act like a monster,,, biblical sjhit never gets it right:P he needs to remove his brain.
1
When I had gallstones, I used Tramadol, up to 6 a day, combined with paracetamol. 5 or 6 1000 mg pills. Then, when that was not enough to take care of the pain after a few days, I went to the ER and got a shot of Morphine.. lovely painkiller, lol. I never wanted any of them unless I was in pain, never missed anything about them unless I was in pain. The only pills I have ever taken ( 40 years ago), that would have made me an addict if I didnt stop, was valium ( for severe anxiety). They were awesome.. I would take 5, and for hours I had no fear of anything, no other emotion either:P I used the one glass I had, 50 pills total, and stopped.. they were too awesome, I knew I would become addicted if I kept using. What I want to ask is, just randomly, lol.. is this the most common way people use pills? Or do they get addicted right away ( after a few days) of use?
1
She had no soot in her lungs, that makes sense, since she was dead before the fire. But why the heck would the baby have had soot in the lungs? A baby, inside its mom, does not have access to outside air... I am now stuck with the grotesque image of the baby breathing through a straw, sticking out of the mom.. Tell me if my comment is too bad, I ll delete it if it is.
1
Perhaps it is time for the USA to actually TRAIN their police officer candidates, and not just give them a crash course in arresting people. 30 weeks of training is NOT enough to learn how to do a job that has so many nuances as that of a police officer. Most other countries provides a 2+ year long education, which also includes psychology and de escalating tactics.
1
@PaigeAnastasia920 Yeah, fighting is all that happens in any military situation, its not like you ever have to eat .. or trust your fellow soldiers to have your back.. its all combat, and no brains.
1