Comments by "Goldenhawk583" (@Goldenhawk583) on "WION" channel.

cases does not equal hospital needs. aMost are very mild. Remember also, the tests are up to 80% false positives ( not to mention the other flaws with the tests). In hospitals, if you come in with a broken leg.. and you test positive.. you are counted as a covid hospital case ( yes, the do fix ur leg too). This gives a very wrong angle for counting actual , serious covid issues.. They also do not mention all the people in hospital due to jab reactions. This channel may be fairly ok, but it still pushes the narrative, rather than truth.
8
@Hema G cats do not take a lot of rats.. they do take mice.. but the cats also take down local wildlife that are NOT mice. You say " dont play with nature" and yet you want a non native species , cats, to run around in austrailia, killing all the native animals they can?
4
@someotherdude not ignorant, it was done on purpose.
4
@kananparasapinas804 And you probably WOULD want to get rid of those humans, if they went on a murdering rampage against the locals.. like feral cats do.
2
that is how the world is supposed to be.. funny lord, to bless one place, while letting billions suffer.
2
@Hema G Where is "here"? A good little terrier would be a lot better hunter of both mice and rats than any cat, and also much less likely to go feral. ( unless the owners tosses it out, that is). If you are in australia, then I know for a fact that you speak for only a few.. not the majority of people. Most australians what to preserve the unique animals/birds/lizards, etc, that live there.. and do not see them as on to go extinct , just because you wanted a cat . You want rodent protection? Get a dog if you are in australia.. and teach it what is ok to kill, and what is not..
1
@Hema G lol, you clearly know nothing of the habits of cats. And I am not talking about removing cats from the food chain, I am talking about removing them from places where they do not belong. If you claim that you live in australia, but all the cats in your surroundings, never hunt... then what help are they against the MICE anyway? Please study a bit.. australia is voulnerable.. rabbits, toads, camels , cats.. not good.
1
@Hema G Oh my god.. Ok, I will give you an example ok? Imagine you live in a place with a lot of little birds that only exist in that place. Cats do not exist in this place, no cats in nature, no cats living with other people. But there are also mice there, so.. you get a cat. Your cat does kill some mice, but it is also very happy killing the little birds. After a few years, there are no more birds , the cat destroyed their nests every year, and it killed the adult birds until there were so few left, that they died out. . And you still have mice, because the cat only kills some of them. In this story, is the cat a good choice to bring in? If you say yes, then you really do not give a shit about nature and the different animals in it.
1
Add to that, an unnatural amount of food available. Perhaps we should stop growing so much grain and have animals on the fields in stead.
1
@akshaybhardwaj471 useful, if you think only humans matter and only short term benefits matter. They are not useful for nature ir wildlife, they are not useful for humans when they break. They hinder us from learning to live WITH nature, and insted we rape it for everything it has.
1
@someotherdude ignorance to a certain degree, bit the fact remains. They had the food, they had the means to transport it.. but they chose to not do it. That is not ignorance, but intent. Mao even said it didnt matter, as China has enough people to fill in for those who die. He knew, he killed them.. on purpose.
1
@lang-ed3bk It was not a decrease in cats, it is the over abundance of available food. Blame the grainfields.. not the lack of cats.
1
cats kills millions of native animals in australia every year... they are NOT native to that country and do extreme damage. How about stopping the grain production and raise meat in stead?
1
@totallyinnocent6261 you ever have a rat infestation?
1
@Zreknarf uhm, no.. cows do great on grasses alone.. Grain is toxic to cows in any large amount. How do you think the huge herds of grazing animals survived , and still survive, without grains? GraiNS are fed to cattle for 2 reasons.. 1, to dairy cows that has been bred to make far more milk than what is natural to them, and 2 , to beef cattle to make them fat before slaughter. They would feel a lot better without grain in their food. Not only would we get rid of the grains, we would improve the soil, and benefit the environment with the sudden stop in use of pesticides and herbicides.. stopping the runoff of fields etc.
1
@Zreknarf True, cattle are not native to australia. BUT, they can be kept on non toxic pasture with grasses that are not likely to cause a huge raise in numbers of mice. This is how you feed them. Normal cattle ( not dairy cows of modern standards), would do just fine in the wild.. their herd instincts are intact, they would know what to eat, and what to avoid. No grains or feeding needed by humans if they roam free. I would say cattle is one of the most natural kinds we have,, sure they have been bred bt humans, but they have not changed so much thay cant live without us . ( again, not dairy cows, they would die out). Cattle can breed with wild cattle types.. they are absolutely not helpless if left to roam.
1
@Zreknarf not all grasses are grain.. even if all grasses would produce seeds, if that is your definition, then yes. Modern grains are a world away from being anything like its ancestors.. old types of grain had a few seeds per plant, modern ones has a lot. Just to mention ONE difference. When we feed cattlle "grain", it is not the green, fresh plants, but the finished seed, ground down to make it absorbable by whoever eats it. When cattle ( or any grazing animal) feeds on a pasture or in the wild, they eat a plethora of different plants, and they eat them in all different stages of growth. A good pasture contains a multitude of different grasses and herbs, it is not a monoculture, which would leave your animals malnourished fairly fast. Plants, including grasses and grains, are inherently toxic, even to herbivores. So not even herbivores will binge on just one kind of plant.. they change often, and do not over eat on any spesific plant . In this way, they never get too much of one toxin at the time.
1
it is NOT time for governments to do anything, it is time for PEOPLE to stop using fb.
1
@keithmoss7460 Humans have little impact, if any. We are in the beginning of a 12000 year disaster cycle.., it is going to get a lot lot worse, and nothing we do will have any affect on that.
1
@shantiq439 Ye... of course, people choose to live in poverty and own nothing, blame the victim, and avoid looking for real causes.
1
@1sthawkfeathers547 So, the god that created evrything.. did not create everything? ye that makes sense... He must feel so much safer, having you protect him:)
1
@whyareyoulying1568 understand god? I would consider any human extremely arrogant and full of himself, if they claim to have a gods understanding of things.
1
@KH-kb1nn That book is only an explantion of a natural disaster cycle, as understood by rather primitive people. Remove the godstory and fanct, and look at it objectively.. this happens regularly.. but with generations between events, sp that those who wanted to, could steal history and use it to their advantage.
1
@F. Friedrich Kling Hauss you are clearly talking about our governments and the owners of huge companies. Sensible people do not do these things.
1
@PsychicLord Actual social equality.. Not a few leaders deciding how everyone else is supposed to be identical to each other. Big difference. Communism sees people as being identical, have the same thoughts, same needs. Social equality without communism sees everyone to be individuals, have different interests and different needs. No leaders needed to decide for everyone, as people cooperate and vote for cases, not politicians.
1
@iamasmurf1122 it is the common cold and flu, nothing more. If anything they said was correct, we would be swimming in sick and dying and dead people by now. And dont tell me that lockdowns stopped it, 1 people are still around, moving about, 2, if the lockdowns workes so well, why are they yelling about a coming spike? We wont be out to get it, so how can it spike? Amount of sick people are normal for this time of year, as is the number of people dying. They just changed the name of the reason to civid19.
1
None other than... as if that is any guarantee.. I agree not to open them, but that is really just common sense at this point.
1
hmm, your logic is flawed. First the poor will die, they are not the core.. then the middle class will die.. they are not the core.. The core is the wealthy leaders who control everything, they will die last, if at all.
1
yes, kill children and people who has to live there and has nothing to do with it , to please your need for revenge.
1
You are correct.. and I fear that as long as people think all floods and disasters are man made, and not only some, they also think it can be stopped in no time at all.. not a good mindset if you are in a risky area.
1
EU having a problem killing people fast enough? They need more bloodclots and weird reasons for people to drop dead? Totally unrelated to a jab ofc :P
1
and perhaps you should stop defending your gods tendency to murder children that has no guilt?
1