Comments by "Goldenhawk583" (@Goldenhawk583) on "TheDC Shorts"
channel.
-
17
-
@rockymaffitt3345 If you assumed that a bolivian male pelvic bone was a female nowegian.. then you would also have to assume that norwegian females had the same skeletal anatomy as men, and that norwegian babies were born VERY small, to fit through the very narrow pelvic canal. Norwegian women would also then be assumed to have broad shoulder, and narrow hips.
Being a norwegian woman, I can assure you, that is not true. We are not bolivian men with boobs. Our children are not extremely small, and our skeltons do not look like male skeltons.
If you saw these 2 skeletons next to eachother, you would know they were 2 males, one smaller than the other, but absolutely 2 males. How? Because they would be extremely similar, pelvic bones would be the same, arm, leg and shoulderbones would be the same, skulls would be very similar. Now, you may not giess right away that one was bolivian, and the other was norwegian, but rather than assuming male/female, you would assume 2 males.. brothers? Father and son? But not man and wife...
Look up actial images of skeletons, male vs female.. And you will see why everyone disagrees with you.
Closer inspection of your example WOULD reveal one norwegian and one bolivian.
7
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1