Comments by "" (@val-schaeffer1117) on "VisualEconomik EN" channel.

@alex__3897 Turkish are out and out White. Block migration of Turks prove the allegation of racism. And even Turks won't be there, had eastern Europe not been behind Iron curtain, during Wiederaufbau phase
1
@alex__3897 My arguments are founded on facts. Germany is as far as Africa as France is to Africa, and much closer to Africa than Britain is to India. There are 1000x Blacks or Indians in France and UK. There are million South Asians in Canada. They are not in Germany, not because of distance, but because of German racism. Ball is in your court.
1
@alex__3897 Geographical distance is not a reason for preferential immigration. People geographically closer to you are racially closer. So it is racist to be preferential to them.
1
@alex__3897 "we haven't had colonies long enough to have a black population."- 1. You did have Colonies in Namibia, Cameroon, Gabon. 2. Where you DID NOT have colonies are Yugoslavia and Turkey, but there are zillions from these countries in Germany, classfied as "racial diversity" aka Südländer, which they are not. They got preferential treatment because they are WHITE 3. Geographical distance between guest and host Nations are totally immaterial. Migrants are travelling the distance, not YOU.
1
@alex__3897 Hello Hello Nat si. Keine Antwort? Eh?
1
@alex__3897 It is a challenge to you. If we WILL dilute the "superior" Arier Nordic Caucasia DNA: the basis of racism and oppression. Or better, make the oppressor DNA cease to exist. No oppressor, no oppression.
1
Taste of the pudding is in eating. If Germany is top ranking in terms of educational rigour, and below average ranking in terms of wealth ownership, it would mean reward to effort ratio of average citizens, is among the worst. Again proving, Germany is a consortium of industrialists, keeping the population at level of well fed plebs, not high enough to fairly challenge upper class (in a liberal free market), but not low enough to burst into a French revolution.
1
This video is a borderline propaganda video. Germany applies "meritocracy" in primary education, effectively screening ethnic German students (in Gymnasium) from migrant origin students (in Hauptschule), purely based on German communication skills. While remains bloody mindedly opposed to real meritocracy in higher education: no proper university ranking or transparent graduate recruitment programs, not to mention language barrier in labour market. Thereby sheltering mediocre Germans from high performing foreign students from emerging countries like China and India (along with EU students, the latter being ENTITLED to equal opportunity, in reality, not so much).
1
Do you have the credibility, charm offensive, and elegance associated with Nordic Caucasian optics and British accent?
1
Germans do not work fewest hours. Germans are recruited after long periods of apprenticeship where they earn peanuts, and finally recruited full time when they are plug-and-play. Germans also rarely change jobs because they CANNOT, given the expectations in alternative jobs are also plug-and-play (not to mention marginal tax rates are sky high taking away financial motivations). If you are a one-trick-pony and getting paid peanuts, you better work efficiently and fewer hours.
1
Hungary would be seen as too racist to be part of BRICS.
1
@koma9790 Ze Germans are 2nd largest immigrant in Denmark and Luxembourg, and largest in Switzerland. Hardly any Hun speaks local language.
1
The assertions are wrong from both LW and RW point of view. From RW POV: Free public transportation are not "free" per se. Just because you aren't paying upfront on pay-as-you-go basis, doesn't mean it is free. Either someone else is subsidising / paying for you, or you are paying for itself through higher tax contribution (intertemporal transfer of cost). From LW POV: People who use the car are affluent ones, and would choose comfort over price. Or they lived in placed where public transport options are limited to begin with. On the other hand, those who use public transport are forced to pay anyway without free vouchers. Personally I would support ONLY work commute being subsidised / paid by employer. Reduction of car use doesn't have to be through luring. What is wrong with enforcement, or massive financial disincentive?
1
@ahmedgouhmid6132 US has minimum wage as well. Furthermore, I fail to see the meritocratic basis of US economy. I am sure you love your as a fonctionnaire in France.
1
@ahmedgouhmid6132 Not everyone earning high salary is FAIR, because it is determined by merit and not everyone has same merit. You are an underperformer, so you love those societies which gives you more freebies.
1
@roaldruss4211 I did make a solid argument on the bias of the person in question. Since when being called fonctionnaire is an insult in France?
1