Comments by "SaBa" (@saba1030) on "NATO makes major changes to address new threats | DW News" video.

 @amunra5330 Nato has nukes as well..
22
@nizarrama225 There are NO Nato troops in Ukraine!!
9
@Veritas.0 Because Lithuania had asked Germany to have a permanent battailon at Lithuania, all agreed by the other Nato partners...this was actually the subject of the DW report...which you obviously didn't even watched...
4
@maxdavis1483 No Nato troops are in Ukraine...
2
@Grobmotoriker-by8lg Recently there are about 40.000ish Nato troops along the eastern EUropean/Nato territories/borders 😊
2
@LloydTaray-bt7ho The Russians were in Afghanistan first, and left a mess there, when they left... Nato went into Afghanistan after 9/11, while schools, hospitals, water supply etc were build, women/girls could go to schools/universities/ work, the Taliban were cowardly hiding in Pakistan or in the rural areas of Afghanistan for 20 years, and only crawled out of their holes, when Nato left. One can't help a country/Afghanistan, when half of its population/men, support the Taliban...those changes of mindset have to come from within the country and its people, not though from the "outside". After Taliban have taken over Afghanistan again, six months later Taliban are begging for money, food and medical aid now at the evil western countries 😅😎
2
@HowardoColeBrown Nato is NOT fighting against Russia... but supporting Ukraine with military equipment...Ukraine isn't even Nato member.. To attack any Nato member state would trigger article 4 and 5 =collective defense obligations = 31 Nato member states with their troops would be involved automaticly =WW III ...which nobody wants 😎 Edit typo/autocorrect
1
@erikitter6773 Nato troops are in the Baltics since 2014, doing air policing, have troops including full equipment and fregates are "cruising" in the Baltic Sea to protect the Baltics from the sea side. Recently there are the NRFNATO VJTF responce force there as well... 😊
1
@bambuco2 There are no Nato troops in the Ukraine!!
1
@andreverwoerd1378 The Baltics are Nato member states, not though Ukraine... Completely different situation that would be. Nato member states are supporting Ukraine with military equipment, but NOT with Nato troops = WW III that would be... which nobody wants to happen. But Nato troops are all along the eastern Nato territories/borders, to show Russia/Belarus, that Nato is there ...😊😎
1
@sammiller6631 Don't worry, tosh, various stuff is ordered, like 35 F-35s, Leopards II-A8, PZH2000s, etc, etc.... can't be build in some weeks... everybody knows that...😎 F-35s get delivered in 2027...
1
@nizarrama225 Ahhh, what a qualified comment that is 🤣 Nato is a defense alliance for its members only, Ukraine isn't even Nato member, but gets supported with military equipment and military advice from Nato member states....if Nato troops would go into Ukraine, it would start WW III, which nobody wants to happen... But... you could move to Russia, Putler needs fresh meat at the front 😎
1
@SmilingNinja Still wrong, because NO Nato troops are fighting in Ukraine..
1
Well most Nato member states are EU member states 😊 Since years the UK and Germany are doing the Nato air policing at the Baltics ...always with British/German cockpit crews 😊
1
@wor53lg50 It's rather the opposit...more than likely Brexiteers don't seem to like, that the UK still is part of the European Continent...but it's NOT in the EUropean Union anymore...oh, and the ECHR is NOT part of the EU27, as 48 countries are members of the ECHR, of which 27 happen to be EU member states. The ECHR is there to protect the human rights, those of the Brits as well, as long, as the UK stays in the ECHR... Greetings from the EU27 👋
1