Comments by "Andre Gon" (@andregon4366) on "Aliens Are Real" video.

 @TheEggroll4321 Listen to your words instead of being an hypocrite. How do you keep a crew alive in a ship for centuries?
2
And apparently they can live several centuries in a ship. Since that's the time they'd take to reach us.
1
@imatiu And don't forget to film them at the lowest resolution possible. If you use high resolution you can't fool anyone by trying to pass a bird for an alien. Also, I find it funny they only crash in the US. No Africa crashes, no south America, no Europe, not even in Canada. What are the odds of an alien ship crash landing on a country full of rednecks that couldn't point the location of their own country on a map? Idiot.
1
@imatiu No matter how far technology goes, it can't break the laws of physics. It's an established fact that you can't move faster than light.
1
@vermusl6316 Established fact according to the laws of the universe. The laws of physics don't change on a whim. You need an infinite amount of energy to make an atom move at the speed of light.
1
@imatiu Wormholes are unstable and microscopic. A wormhole big enough would self destruct due to background feedback. Just like feeding a speaker it's own amplified sound where it keeps amplifying until it breaks. Sci-Fi is very nice when you don't have that pesky reality getting in your way. And a civilization capable of doing all that, would also be able to have AI more advanced than a falible biological creature to control a ship. Not to mention that a civilization that advanced would be able to figure out how to transfer someone's consciousness to a synthetic body, without the limitations that nature gave them during the process of evolution.
1
@imatiu So? If you don't want a synthetic body don't get it. That doesn't mean the ships will be crewed by biological bodies when synthetic bodies are expendable and replaceable. A synthetic body would survive more harsh climates (pressure , temperature, radiation, etc) and fly on ships without conditions (or without the need to create suitable conditions) to keep a crew alive. There's literally no reason to take unnecessary risks when you have a safe and viable alternative. Your opinion of what you want or not is irrelevant. And if the aliens don't have a similar thinking as us, the idea of a synthetic body may not even be optional. And why would an alien civilization be filling excel sheets? Why would you criticize me for assuming aliens have a similar mindset as me while you'd imply they'd have yours other than being hypocritical? And do you realise the scientists that prepared the space missions weren't the ones who were sent to space? The feedback thing was on a documentary I watched years ago. It would be a feat and a half to find it out. So you can take that with a grain of salt, since I can't back up my claim.
1
@ProjectMoff What? Are you really trying to pass a fantasy as an observable event? What a moron. "How do you fly faster than..." Answer: You don't. It has never been done or testified. Anecdotes aren't evidence.
1
@Truthbetold1988 Shoot down a fighter with a bow and arrow. That's the difference between us and an hypothetical alien civilization capable of reaching us.
1
@raglock1433 We can't still break the laws of physics we found out 100 years ago. Just because we find new stuff, that doesn't mean we get a free pass to break the laws that was already known. Here's an example: we couldn't get energy from nuclear fission from protons. And we still can't. We figured out that neutrons existed, and that made it possible. But we still can't use protons. Can we find a particle that makes it possible to do things we currently can't? Sure. But don't take them from granted until someone finds it. Save your wishful thinking for yourself and movies. Reality doesn't care about what you think.
1
@raglock1433 If they were laws of physics, the answer is still the same. If those rules were established arbitrarily, then they're not laws of physics. It doesn't matter for how long those laws of physics are known. The Pythagorean theorem is still valid after thousands of years passed. And it will remain valid for as long reality doesn't change.
1
@raglock1433 And we don't know what dark energy is, but just because we found out something that is making the universe accelerate, doesn't mean the thermodynamic laws are wrong, nor can we make perpetual motion machines.
1
@nyxgaming9952 Then prove it.
1
@nyxgaming9952 What's claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Have a nice day.
1
@MrSub132 In theory, yes. In reality, you don't even know if it's possible at all.
1