General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Andre Gon
Thunderf00t
comments
Comments by "Andre Gon" (@andregon4366) on "Why do people laugh at FLAT EARTHERS! (Part 1)" video.
Flattard reasoning: The pictures are CGI, the hedgehogs are paid actors, the mirror is a hologram.
24
@Zero11s Yes we do: it's fantasy
12
@daedalusweyland4431 Non flattards can accept the earth is an oblate spheroid. But why wasting time typing "oblate spheroid" when you can just say globe? Besides, most non flattard say ROUND, oblate spheroid is round, globe is round, flat is not round. I could also say that in the 4th dimension the Earth is flat. But why go to such extent when flattards can't even comprehend 3 dimensions?
5
@Grunchy005 they're still people worthy of being taken seriously. No, they're not. The moment those inbred mouthbreathers shit on the people that died in space missions was the moment they shown everyone they're not even worthy of respect, let alone being taken seriously. Even monkeys do that. When a monkey sounds the alarm whenever it sees a non dangerous snake the other monkeys stop paying attention to it's alarm sounds.
4
Iridescent Silhouette The footage shows the sky to be black... Why would it be of any other colour if there's no atmosphere? the ground looks unnatural. Why would the Moon's ground look natural? What does that even mean? Earth like? IT'S THE FUCKING MOON NOT THE EARTH. Of course it won't look like the Earth. That's like someone living on the Sahara desert saying the North Pole doesn't look natural because they never saw snow. The fact that it looks like nothing on Earth just works against your point. It's my opinion, It's still a shitty opinion. All opinions that go against facts are shitty opinions.
4
Iridescent Silhouette https://youtu.be/dWBYAxhH3u4 How could NASA do something with a technology they didn't have? Why no other country (enemies especially) contested the moon landings? How do you explain the retroreflectors on the surface of the Moon?
2
@thescienceofscience.8556 Maybe you prefer something like this: https://youtu.be/_bHqBy92iGM
2
@therealctp6675 Both are lidless and both can contain fluids. And debunking an entire conspiracy with something as simple and mundane as a glass of water is the icing on top.
2
Arguing with a flattard is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good at chess you are, the pigeon will climb on the table, knock down all the pieces, shit on the board and strut around like it won.
2
TF is talking about flattards! YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1
Liquids and gases are both fluids. So yes, both are pretty much the same.
1
@cmoullasnet Not just that but the glass has higher pressure at the bottom and less in the top, so that also adresses the request they make about pressure gradient.
1
@erikjarandson5458 You can even make an aluminium boat and make it float on what seems to be nothing: https://youtu.be/UI4Fw6iDFZ8
1
@Ch35h1r3C47 Maybe Halon is cheaper? It does the same thing... except it's toxic.
1
@Lickemstick False. Water can only evaporate as long as the outside water pressure is lower than the maximum water pressure possible. Fill a cup of water in a humid enviroment (rain forest for example) and the water not only doesn't evaporate, but the cup will fill even more.
1
@Heracles_FE Nothing of what I said come close to even remotely disprove gravity.
1