Comments by "Samson Soturian" (@samsonsoturian6013) on "Pete Judo" channel.

  1. ​@fromabove422 vhut? These Indians weren't involved in any other conflicts we're aware of and they didn't like me saying that.
    1
  2. ​ @fromabove422 the context is these were unidentified Indians in Mexican service stealing cattle from Federals
    1
  3. It's all fake
    1
  4. Dude, AI development has not been remotely rapid. It's as old as the circuit board.
    1
  5. That applies to what are basically humanities studies that pretend to be science. Namely sociology and psychology. Criminal psychology and criminal justice don't have that issue because they don't pretend to be science
    1
  6. It was just a big number she pulled from thin air
    1
  7. Not really. Recall people were adding their names to all the papers they could often without even knowing what the research was about. This egomaniac would totally be stupid enough to do that
    1
  8. No, there's no drug associated with this research, that's probably why he did it. All the perks of real world science, none of the criminal liabilities
    1
  9. That appears to be happening as we speak with record high enrollment at community colleges and trade schools and very little donations entering ivy league schools. This partially due to the state of the economy at the moment, but scandals appear to also be a factor.
    1
  10. There's no drug associated with it. The real depressing statistic is that 90% of treatments submitted for FDA approval fail. All of those treatments passed the rigors of academic and corporate approval
    1
  11. It's the same reason news outlets only talk about shocking things. They get paid per click
    1
  12. Hardeehar
    1
  13. Shut up. Get drafted
    1
  14. The science channels/magazine writers that you watch/read are getting their stuff from Frontiers and other big journals
    1
  15. Who is they? There are thousands of allegedly academic journals out there
    1
  16. Because they don't care about science, they want the fame/fortune that comes with being at the top
    1
  17. No one cares
    1
  18.  @Tuhar  this idiot doesn't know how many deadbeats there are skewing statistics
    1
  19. To show how common alluminum oxide is, it's the active ingredient in sunscreen
    1
  20. There can be harmful frauds in other fields. Historians I see are actively encouraging prejudices.
    1
  21. Given most peer to peer emails get sent to spam folders, this is the same as not providing the data
    1
  22. Science never had integrity. The snake oil scams just larger as academia did and became more frequent as we subsidized research
    1
  23. What they were arguing was ethics go out the window when careers are involved. It's like how thieves are deluded all rich people are thieves
    1
  24. It's like how everyone lies about paleotology. We don't know half as much as teachers will tell you
    1
  25. Pride/greed
    1
  26. Except that is also fraud since it isn't their work
    1
  27. Who?
    1
  28. With many it would simply be impossible because not even science knows the answer to the questions the fraudsters ask.
    1
  29. If the results support existing political rhetoric then it's fraud. I find this when reading history all the time, no further study necessary: Fraud.
    1
  30. Maybe not fraud, but just an egotistical bastard, or maybe a little of both
    1
  31. Draconian consequences don't effect behavior when enforcement is near zero
    1
  32. The potency scales you have are misleading because most opioids have the same effects but different drugs are absorbed at different rates. Fentanyl isn't stronger, it just gets absorbed instantly, you can even get high by absorbing it through your skin
    1
  33. Like you're different?
    1
  34. Not necessarily. But there's a basic assumption that is wrong: People are not writing academic papers in order to advance humanity, but to advance their careers or opinions.
    1
  35. Because institutions aren't an omnipotent being, but a group of people. Many are naive, others committed lesser sins that do not amount to fraud, others are more concerned with politics than results (most major fraudsters were DEI hires), and many are also fraudsters and don't report crimes except when they have a personal vendetta.
    1
  36. A lot of people WANT fraud to go unnoticed. It's like the Olympics, we want to entertain power fantasies about what is possible, also fraud is the only way to change demographic trends in academia
    1
  37.  @ktktktktktktkt  Some people would do that, but some people are poor because they spend money stupidly
    1
  38. Googling... There's so much stuff about his wall street bets and imposters on Facebook I can't find if that is so
    1
  39. I know without looking. Rich chumps, DEI appointees, frauds, nepo babies, and any combination thereof
    1
  40. All ivy league colleges are like that
    1
  41. Guys, all those scammers were pretending to have attended Harvard, are we surprised Harvard was full of people trying to scam their way into a degree?
    1
  42. That statement is meaningless
    1
  43. With a lot of these academics you know they're frauds just from the names. Where they're from, the facilities simply don't exist to put them in high office
    1
  44. A lot of these papers aren't too good to be true, but too obfuscated to be understood
    1
  45. Even so, you'll need something concrete to accuse him of anything
    1
  46. Shut up
    1
  47. Vhut?
    1
  48. Liars get scalped, Greedo
    1
  49. There's certainly a lot of bad science, but all broad judgments is just political bullshit
    1
  50. ​ @kablamo9999 that means nothing
    1