Comments by "Samson Soturian" (@samsonsoturian6013) on "Bloomberg Television" channel.

  1. His opinion on the matter is irrelevant. On second thought, has he ever said anything at all that wasn't perfectly in line with current blue party consensus?
    31
  2. People betting on a regime change always lose.
    26
  3. Market forecasts are like buttholes. Everyone's got them and they all stink.
    21
  4. Someone tell the political science major that Russian and Ukrainian culture are near identical.
    18
  5. This verdict was predictable, given the plaintiff was a Chinese citizen and Tesla is based outside China.
    17
  6. As WSB would say: Puts on her portfolio.
    16
  7. I love it there's crypto scammers in the comments of this very video...
    16
  8. They'll blame gas companies for price hikes next year
    15
  9. You can assume Ms Sen is buying the dip.
    15
  10. I think it's fair to say the editors at Bloomberg are in the red on several big Chinese stock positions.
    15
  11. Office workers in China have been doing this years because commute times of three hours or more are quite common.
    14
  12. Below zero one year, 84 dollars a barrel the next. Markets are crazy.
    10
  13. Due to high regulatory risk and systemic fraud issues.
    8
  14. Headline is factually inaccurate. Are they really in such a rush to publish they regurgitate state sources?
    8
  15. He'd go to juvie because he was a minor at the time. Also, he's not going to prison. I will literally bet my life on it.
    7
  16. The sign that a business is a ponzi scheme is they don't like people calling it risky
    7
  17. China's incapable of producing weapons to Russian quality standards.
    7
  18. And yet, if there is a recession, this guy will be utterly shocked as his high growth positions evaporate....
    6
  19. She knows more about market than you ever will.
    5
  20. Call it what it is. Rioting.
    5
  21. Prices have to stay really high for shale to be profitable.
    5
  22. Who said he was threatened by MBS? The "royal family" that he equates with "the government" has a couple thousand members.
    5
  23. Finally. Fresh meme material.
    5
  24. He is just a teenager. What did anyone expect?
    5
  25. The more people talk about downturn, the less likely it becomes. What you should worry about are parts of the economy considered infallible.
    5
  26. Same way your house is appraised. They look at what other similar assets are selling for right now... The perfect opportunity to make shit up
    4
  27. You need a big gas pipeline. They're expensive, take years to build, and a trans-Atlantic pipe may not be physically possible.
    4
  28. He sounds like he predicted 50 of the last 2 crashes.
    4
  29. Dude, there was no science going on. It was all fake and Ms Holmes didn't even gain basic medical knowledge before dropping out of college.
    4
  30. There were capital outflows. She had little choice.
    4
  31. I would never say something like that on camera. The chance it becomes dated or omninous in rhetorspect is too high...
    3
  32. Does he think regurgitating viral tweets will make him hip?
    3
  33. You'll see a lot of Chinese firms trading at ridiculous multiples. For a lot of them, the market is simply pricing in the higher risks most Chinese firms pose.
    3
  34. You don't need to stage mob violence. There's always plenty of idiots that will risk their lives just to make a scene that looks good on camera.
    3
  35. 0:35 Why does that building say "Diamond City" in English?
    3
  36. Historically speaking, US investors worry more about systemic risks than they really need to.
    3
  37. This isn't the pandemic era.
    3
  38. China has nukes. How does your literal conspiracy theory even hypothetically work?
    3
  39. Oddly enough, no. It won't. People will build green stuff irrespective of supply and demand
    3
  40. If he said it then, he'd be significantly wealthier now.
    3
  41.  @arod8596  shut up
    3
  42. You're ignoring the high volatility of the fund, and would have sung her praises last year.
    3
  43. To the surprise of exactly no one
    3
  44. They're simply discovered there a lot. Not surprising, they're a country where one part lacks basic sanitation and another has first class scientists.
    3
  45. Paper value, not actual value
    2
  46. Probably a Cold War antique well past its rated shelf life.
    2
  47. This is Saudi Arabia. Where a handful of clans brawl over offices and rackets and there's no distinction between state and private funds. Namely, it is actually not known how the current crown prince came to power as he actually wasn't the last king's chosen heir. And this guy in the interview was definitely threatened over something and fled his home.
    2
  48. They'll play dumb regardless if they were duped or not. No telling if any will be convicted
    2
  49. Shut up and get drafted
    2
  50. Finally, quality due diligence from MSM... and everyone is ignoring it.
    2
  51. A lot of people won't buy government bonds right now because they think the Feds are going to raise their own interest rates soon.
    2
  52. Innovation doesn't discriminate.
    2
  53. That's a veiled way of saying they struggle to stay profitable.
    2
  54. Scared about something. Afraid things will blow up in his face. But hilariously non-specific. WHO in government made this "understanding" (aka extortion). And what is this corruption he vigorously denies any part with? And why was he forced out of office? And why is sound like he's lying?
    2
  55.  @guitarandmore69  I'm a military historian specializing in terrorism. Shut up, we both know you don't have the guts to fight cops.
    2
  56. Felony convictions. The judge doesn't have a choice in the matter but to send her to prison. Period.
    2
  57. Goodness, most of these comments are scam and spam.
    2
  58. He didn't even cause the crisis that bears his name.
    2
  59. You won't hold down a job with that degree of arrogance.
    2
  60.  @RussInGA  with companies that big I'd be surprised if there wasn't between workman's comp, idiot political activists, and contract disputes with other companies. Will any of them potentially cause layoffs or high profile sackings or debilitating fines? Because if they won't I doubt the average reader will want to hear of them.
    2
  61. It's America. Everyone is deluded that things will always be much worse than they are. In this case, there was a list of reasons for the Fed to raise rates, everyone lost their minds about it for a couple months, then the Fed raised rates just a little with a statement they might raise it more later, which they just did.
    2
  62.  @WebPocket  she takes accounting numbers as legit. In China that's the definition of naive
    2
  63. They keep covering this as if the producer is in the red on ARKX....
    2
  64. Your opinion on the matter is irrelevant.
    2
  65. Of course they catch him, but not because some irrelevant politician said so.
    2
  66. Don't be ridiculous. She makes her living off commission.
    2
  67. It can also work the other way. Since the execs are expecting these bonuses they can be arbitrarily removed as punishment.
    2
  68. This is Communist China we're talking about.
    2
  69. Reporting on losses great than that of Black Thursday is FUD? You sir are clearly acting in bad faith.
    2
  70. I think I might short SPYG and buy SPYV. Rates go up, value outperform growth, tidy profit for me.
    2
  71. He's invested in the firm. He's required to be invested in the firm
    2
  72. His accent says otherwise. Let me look him up... He's from New York and is the director of the US-China Business Council (a non-profit encouraging US-China trade and investment) as well as the director of Carlyle asset management which is also invested in China. More than likely, he should have disclosed in the interview he has a bunch of calls on Chinese stocks that will expire worthless. Because the interview screams Conflict of Interest.
    2
  73. You sound you've said that every week for a decade
    2
  74. Plus flooding. Plus energy crisis. Plus Fantasia. Plus the generally sluggish economy.
    2
  75. Technically Hedgies invest in anything they want, even collectibles. The difference is the problems with Hedgies are widely known while most people never heard of private credit
    2
  76. She definitely ain't keeping the money, bozo. Any civil court would coerce her to hand it over without a trial
    2
  77. Who needs fundamentals when you got confirmation bias?
    2
  78. That's not something you should casually wish upon someone.
    2
  79. Wrong thread
    2
  80. This is probably going to get dated
    2
  81. Corporations don't age like people either
    2
  82. That statement applies to both sides.
    2
  83. Be nice.
    2
  84. This will get weird
    2
  85. We get it. Your editor is still in the red.
    2
  86. No one that is currently suing government departments for not using EV has been buying EV, why would they do so because gasoline is momentarily expensive?
    2
  87. She'll spend years in jail but somehow "got away with it." And even if the worse possible outcome for her happened, life in prison would not be an option. Quit spreading libel, you're so bad at it you might not be fit to breed.
    1
  88.  Seven Ellen  don't be silly. It's a narrow margin business and the more taxes, regs, fees, vandalism, and boycotts you pile on the more the end consumer pays for them. So lose the gaslighting, you're no good at it.
    1
  89. Who knows. This property bubble was much more localized and intense than even the 2008 housing crisis. It is even possible that lingering debt will be the least of China's worries if certain sectors/governments go defunct.
    1
  90. What you talking about? Party members are just as involved as everyone else in this bubble. For instance, in China the government owns all the land and leases it for decades. Lease transfer fees/taxes are about 40% of the cost of a house, giving government officials incentive to see property costs grow. It also means there's no reason to build anything that will outlive the lease. More importantly, China's local officials are appointed by Beijing and are in highly competitive positions with promotions/demotions/jail/bonus/state resources being given out based on GDP numbers. That plus crony capitalism is tolerated, equals a lot of state-backed urban building ventures with contracts going to men with friends in high places.
    1
  91. In Communist China, high profile bankruptcies are called a Tuesday.
    1
  92. ESG investing is pretty much useless as there's several thesis behind it that all contradict each other. Also, we have governments for this sort of thing.
    1
  93. He's a doomer. That means we'll jack off to his idea and actively berate/censor anyone who disagrees on social media. Welcome to America
    1
  94. I wish
    1
  95. Incitement to riot is an actual crime. Revise your comment
    1
  96. She's going to prison for more than a year. I bet the lives of everyone on this thread.
    1
  97. Note the Communist government is fighting against monopolies, but since they're Communists state run ventures are allowed monpolies.
    1
  98. Dude, the man in this video represents an institution investing in China. They're just as human as the next guy.
    1
  99. He's defending his own reputation but doesn't want to reveal any info.
    1
  100. It's about potentially raising taxes by a lot
    1
  101.  @Thatanonguyintheback  long term capital gains, yes. But the point of the video was a lot of novice traders find out the hard way why it's better to hold for at least a year. In one extreme case, a guy bought and sold the SPY fund daily thinking he could outsmart the market. He didn't, and made little money, and due to wash sale rules his losses were discounted but gains were counted resulting in a nominal tax bill lager than his net worth.
    1
  102.  @XSlapHappy91X  incitement to riot is an actual crime. Revise your statement or keep your mouth shut
    1
  103.  @gamecoolguy619  I repeat. You. Are. Committing. A. Crime. Right here. Right now.
    1
  104.  @gamecoolguy619  Too lazy to Google so you try to get me to? Bug off, punk. It's not like you'd care to open the link.
    1
  105. The jargon is the "market is pricing in risk."
    1
  106. He's full of it.
    1
  107. Lose the sycophancy
    1
  108. Said the coward
    1
  109.  @XSlapHappy91X  you know actual children invented that comeback line?
    1
  110.  @scythermantis  is that a threat?
    1
  111.  @XSlapHappy91X  shut up and get drafted, freak show. You'll sober up at Benning
    1
  112.  @darkskinamerican7826  a bored army vet.
    1
  113.  @guitarandmore69  you definitely do, hypocrite. Now shut up.
    1
  114.  @OezgeSebisteri  just because you like what he said doesn't mean he ain't a keyboard warrior. So lose the "no u" spamming.
    1
  115. His likely replacements aren't any different, and Beijing isn't Evergrande
    1
  116. Who's the idiot screaming bloody murder?
    1
  117. Public enemy, more like.
    1
  118. It's way to fat to be a SAM. Lose the defamation.
    1
  119.  @vanwandererx852  you mind lending me that crystal ball when you're done?
    1
  120. @D R in order for a third party to profit from that wouldn't there need to be a shale oil stock to pump and dump.
    1
  121.  @bobpadok5331  gas cost the same here, but varies considerably between states in both the US and Europe.
    1
  122.  @percyfaith11  those cost more than the pipe they were using
    1
  123.  @matthewjacobs141  ever heard of pipelines? They're by far the mmost cost effective way of delivering tons of material. Yeah, Poland won't freeze because of this but that doesn't mean there's an easy solution
    1
  124. No... Don't make wild allegations if you don't know the most basic facts about the countries in question.
    1
  125.  @happyscrappy370  it's slang from a specific Reddit community.
    1
  126.  @anthonylosego  I've stopped investing since then, but I did make some money off SARK.
    1
  127. Shut up
    1
  128. @E don't you have a shock therapy session or something?
    1
  129. There most likely won't be any word at all until the day they're banned (if they are).
    1
  130. Not necessarily. This means fewer dollars going into Russia, it doesn't necessarily reduce demand for the dollar.
    1
  131.  @Gilmourist  dude, all that means is we'll need to take dollars out of circulation.
    1
  132.  @christianvachon2235  you don't know basic economics, so bug off.
    1
  133. It'll flop
    1
  134. Same story. You and I have enough spending money to afford it.
    1
  135. Do you say that on every economics video? Cuz we're talking about China.
    1
  136. Dear Mr Sulivan, Don't assume this is not the start of a systemic breakdown. Evergande's extreme levels of debt and high turnover are quite common in Chinese real estate and there are corporate bankruptcies every day of the week in that sector. Housing costs are artifically high, ghost cities are not common, and so are unused skyscrapers. To be fair, it's been like this for a while.
    1
  137. Smile for the camera.
    1
  138. You know Ukraine is still pumping Russian gas, right?
    1
  139. He doesn't speak for Europe. And it's kinda obvious that failure to pay is bankruptcy so why you freaking out?
    1
  140.  @Buddhavibez  pretty much just like you
    1
  141. She's going to lose money violently...
    1
  142. Hasn't the Fed been indefinitely suspending approval for these ETFs?
    1
  143. I heard about the GM one, it wasn't anything big and it's old news. What about the others?
    1
  144.  @eric5901  that's what you suppose to be true, but in fact you don't know that. Forecasts were largely positive until the trade war, even among people who didn't like Communism.
    1
  145. That rules yourself out, coward
    1
  146. There's frankly no way to tell at this time.
    1
  147. Russians don't want currencies they might not be able to spend later and they don't want any chance they're bank accounts will be raided too.
    1
  148. It was also suppose to be a currency, but they're all being held as an investment and traded off the blockchain at large centralized banks.
    1
  149. You sure he's even aware of all the risks his underlings take? The CCP is highly competitive and they're all cheaters.
    1
  150. Duh.
    1
  151. You put "the Fed" in the title. Thus you'll get permabear stock fraudsters in the comments calling you a liar.
    1
  152. That's not called for, she really believes what she says.
    1
  153.  @godzillamothra5983  when did I say anything about myself? The point was the rules and expectations are completely different in modern China than anywhere else in the world or history. Not even China a century ago has much in common with Communist China.
    1
  154.  @godzillamothra5983  who said anyone outside China was? Fact of the matter is often the excuse Chinese investors give for their excessive risk is that Beijing will bail them out, especially when you're talking large and/or state owned ventures. This belief is reinforced by Beijing maintaining the illusion they control the economy. As for the average foreign chump, they really can't be expected to know better. Besides, in the US the Fed always says don't expect bailouts but often does so anyway.
    1
  155.  @godzillamothra5983  again, I said nothing of my opinions. You seem to think you're in foreign and hostile territory for some reason.
    1
  156. Evergande was a private enterprise.
    1
  157.  @clocktower1164  you say that but you don't mean it.
    1
  158. @G S don't give stock picks around here. Too many scammers.
    1
  159. There were felony convictions. The judge can choose how many years she serves, but he can't set her free.
    1
  160. You are a liar. You do believe him and didn't watch the video before saying that.
    1
  161. It literally isn't.
    1
  162. He just scamming people into buying books for of ranting that people want to hear.
    1
  163. Or perhaps he was threatened with hie life and that's why he left his home.
    1
  164. Same story, different month.
    1
  165. Investors seem to be reacting
    1
  166.  @nicopono1  uh, that makes no sense for the OP's statement. Did you mean that for someone else?
    1
  167. She must. At lot of her investors pulled out.
    1
  168. Ha.
    1
  169. It's a good thing you have no idea what you're talking about then.
    1
  170.  aboxoffrogs  that's impossible
    1
  171.  @eljefe5858  what does that have to do with what I said?
    1
  172.  @vulpsturm  Please leave the white house staff to those of us that know basic facts about white house staff.
    1
  173. 20 years is more than enough for a scammer.
    1
  174. Spam that a lot? This doesn't effect the US.
    1
  175. @taun do you not understand basic economics? This is a matter of currencies and the Russians fear they might be able to spend Euros and dollars later.
    1
  176.  @christianvachon2235  dollars are not pegged to oil.
    1
  177.  @briant5685  that's silly. These guys aren't in cahoots and the US economy doesn't depend on dollars being the international currency
    1
  178.  @liyexiang666  you know there was as much cash from other hedgies as retailers going into GME, right?
    1
  179.  @liyexiang666  bad luck, bro
    1
  180. It's like watching a train derail in slo-mo...
    1
  181. Please leave the Fed to people even remotely competent.
    1
  182.  @Leshic2  yep, I heard of him. Not the first time he did something lawful but awful too.
    1
  183. You don't know a thing about the oil industry. It's a narrow margin business, meaning nearly all of that goes immediately too expensive for equipment, sallaries, taxes, insurance, etc. Also, we live in a multi-trillion dollar economy. And you think extorting these guys will solve would solve world problems?
    1
  184. They're also working on the assumption that Chinese corporations and government are not faking the numbers.
    1
  185. China's bad but not that bad. In Afghanistan you must contend with 95% of the population being addicted to opium. The few schools that exist are largely fraudulent. And businesses are all either foreign owned, state owned, or not profitable.
    1
  186. Liars lose money. So shut up
    1
  187. That's a total guess.
    1
  188.  @Tannyk1  liar
    1
  189.  @Tannyk1  You're not. Now shut up
    1
  190.  @Tannyk1  shut up
    1
  191. Who cares? As long as she doesn't run.
    1
  192.  @veronicaalmeda8014  liars burn in hell. There's felony convictions involved.
    1
  193.  @redmed10  liar
    1
  194. There's been a lot of drama between the firm and investors. Apparently management is experiencing loss depression and have no faith in themselves while investors think they just got unlucky.
    1
  195. Even if it did do well, that's at the expense of borrowers who could get cheaper loans from a bank.
    1
  196. Surprising no one...
    1
  197. A total guess
    1
  198. It's easy for distant enemies to boycott, but Russia and Ukraine are brother nations and can't avoid doing business with each other.
    1
  199. That literally isn't what's in the video
    1
  200. They're an old automaker. They actually have to be profitable to get that kind of money.
    1
  201. I wish. Now get back to work, slacker.
    1
  202. Stock forecasts are like buttholes. Everyone's got 'em and they all stink.
    1
  203. She didn't "lose" it. She bought into bubbles.
    1
  204. Dude, this is happening because Mr Biden thinks only rich people own stocks.
    1
  205. That's just the market pricing in the risks.
    1
  206. Well, it was until the war started. But you'd also have to contend with the nationalization of many key industries and price fixing. Nazi Germany had more control over industry than Communist China but they allowed all previously private companies to keep being publicly trading. Although most stock markets were closed too, and private investors often forced to sell shares to the government and/or to party members. By the start of the war there wasn't much besides bonds to invest in but those were doing good.
    1
  207.  @honeypuffs5677  except you didn't
    1
  208.  @BobBob-kr5wr  sell out to who? Chinese stock does not equal state owned ventures and state owned ventures do not equal commies.
    1
  209.  @БлагоВсем-о7ю  you didn't read the headline, did you?
    1
  210.  @marklieberman1527  you know I'm always skeptical about such claims but in this case an algorithm really could make these comments
    1
  211. This isn't news. If GDP targets were met that would that would be obvious fraud.
    1
  212. She's a lot of things, but not a scammer.
    1
  213.  @SSChambers1  that's a systemic issue with these actively managed funds. When they're up, they're infallible, when they're down, they're frauds. It should show investor greed drives demand for these funds as all they care about are returns and not risk, or evidence, or investment thesis'.
    1
  214. If you had a billion dollars would you know how to spend it?
    1
  215. Apply that logic to your own portfolio before giving others advice.
    1
  216. THis idiot sure as hell doesn't know what the Fed is or is not doing. Fire the editor for incompetence.
    1
  217. The comment right below yours was a scammer.
    1
  218. No. Now shut up
    1
  219.  @franklindroosevelt4712  dude, he's just spamming partisan bull like you are right now
    1
  220.  @franklindroosevelt4712  that's classic manipulation. You're arguing that no one should argue with you. So do us a favor and shut your trap on legislative matters. Permanently.
    1
  221. This is why you're not a lawyer
    1
  222.  @eatmyshorts7973  that you have no friggin clue what you're talking about. The case laws and reasonings behind it concerning this were well established decades ago.
    1
  223.  @eatmyshorts7973  quit proving the point. Look up Delahanty v Hinckley if you really are interested.
    1
  224. That makes no sense given the subject matter. Copy-paste that on any article with her name on it, much?
    1