Comments by "Samson Soturian" (@samsonsoturian6013) on "" video.

  1. That's when the new tank is planned, not when the old tanks will be retired
    2
  2. Lasers aren't lighter due to power requirements
    2
  3. Booker
    1
  4. All the internals have been replaced over time. A new chasis doesn't necessarily change anything
    1
  5. The Pentagon knows nothing of science. They just use buzzwords
    1
  6. The Pentagon knows nothing of science. They just use buzzwords
    1
  7. Vietnam, India, and Russia are wild card allies.
    1
  8. The systems are not equivalent.
    1
  9. Are an oxymoron
    1
  10. The chasis is old, everything else is new.
    1
  11. There's so many engineering misconceptions there
    1
  12. We already have shotgun based system that work well. The power supply for a laser is too much weight
    1
  13. Nah. It was mostly installing upgraded systems as they became available. The Abrams went from analogue to touch screen over of the decades
    1
  14. How
    1
  15. Don't make performance predictions about stuff that hasn't been invented yet.
    1
  16.  @kathrynck  you never noticed those projections are usually bullshit?
    1
  17. No one read that. The opening statement proves you don't know how AI works.
    1
  18.  @mm650  shut up
    1
  19. The Booker is great but we're going to need MBTs. Maybe not as many as politicians think we do but still
    1
  20.  @andrewreynolds4949  airborne units are a legal fiction within the army. We don't mass paradrop anymore
    1