Comments by "Samson Soturian" (@samsonsoturian6013) on "" video.

  1. They really need a tankette, but the only way you'll convince the Pentagon to buy them is if they're moveable by both amphibious boat and helicopter.
    3
  2. Tell that to the tank mechanics, who have a repair/tow vehicle on the same chasis as the Abrams
    3
  3. I say we make an unironic tankette so the marines can get their armor back
    3
  4. Or if you're an idiot activist, if it's armored vehicle it's a tank
    2
  5. The real reason planes use machine guns and not cannons is they can't handle the recoil. A cannon of the same weight is a whole lot cheaper to build and maintain and can demolish more armor.
    1
  6. No tank is built to engage enemy armor
    1
  7. Stugs had no turret and a full sized gun. Same strategic use, though
    1
  8. TDS to drones is proof you have no idea what you're talking about
    1
  9. Same concept as the Rooikat. Good enough to be pressed into service as a main battle tank, but cheap enough to be used against obscure tiny fronts.
    1
  10. That is called the Striker MGS, and that and the Bradley are the vehicles this replaces
    1
  11. Reply to wrong person? ​ @Tek-eo3li 
    1