Comments by "Samson Soturian" (@samsonsoturian6013) on "" video.

  1. The owners are actual engineers funded by VC firms and airline companies. Not the type of guys to gamble with their lives
    27
  2. It's the same reason the passenger seats and meals got smaller. It's just a matter of bringing air travel to the masses
    27
  3. We kind of maxed out the science of aerodynamics at the end of the Cold War. It's why you see new tech going into old airframes
    15
  4. Because he is a pilot and not an actor
    3
  5. The world doesn't need you breathing, belching gas and CO2 either
    2
  6. Musk never put people on a rocket that wasn't safety rated. That was Rush, and he was gambling with his own life mostly
    1
  7. Sure, it will be a fraction the price
    1
  8. You're ruled out both ways
    1
  9. No
    1
  10. Lose the bull. The CEO is an engineer involved in previous ponzi schemes. They probably don't care if this ever becomes profitable, they just want get paid to do science
    1
  11. If rich idiots want to pay that much to cross the Atlantic 6 hours sooner, let them. Boom can use those fat profit margins to make better planes.
    1
  12. Who cares?
    1
  13. Wannabe terrorists have no effect on profitability. Case in point, ExxonMobil
    1
  14. You can't intentionally destroy a test vehicle unless it is unmanned
    1
  15. ​ @NinetyTres shut up
    1
  16. Who would pay for supersonic passenger jets?
    1
  17. Liars get scalped
    1
  18. ​@Xtariz so you are TECHNICALLY a liar
    1
  19. Luxury goods have fat profit margins. They could make money once they have a plane, until the next recession
    1
  20. Not really. Many would argue the economics of this make it a ponzi scheme. But it is good science
    1