Comments by "Dominic Pelle" (@dominicpelle7841) on "'The Five' breaks down Mueller mania" video.

Bwaaaaaaaahahahaha... from the Mueller report summary. *And as set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.* Bwaaaaaaahahahahahaha... RUN TRUMPANZEES RUN
2
@robertkleiman Some more word salad for you.. FROM MUELLER .. YOU KNOW THE GUY WHO WROTE THE REPORT. The introduction to the Volume II of our report explains that decision. It explains that under longstanding department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that, too, is prohibited. A special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice, and by regulation, it was bound by that department policy. Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider. The department’s written opinion explaining the policy makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation. Those points are summarized in our report, and I will describe two of them for you. Might be a bit too complex for trailer trash Trump supporters.. with no moral compass or IQ And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing. And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge.
1
@robertkleiman Ha.. Ha.. Ha... Ha... have fun on Wednesday.. MORON
1