Comments by "115islands Compass" (@115islandscompass6) on "Bloomberg Television" channel.

  1. Then, why China is poaching in Japan's territorial waters?
    4
  2.  @伊正-u3b  So, why China is poaching in Japan's territorial waters?
    4
  3.  @伊正-u3b  Hahaha Can't you understand without detailed explanation? Japanese marine products are collected in the territorial waters of Japan. You said you wouldn't eat Japanese seafood because it's dirty. But if so, you should come to the conclusion that the marine products that Chinese fishermen have taken in Japanese waters are also dirty. If all the Chinese think so, they don't know which seafood was poached in Japanese territory, so the Chinese can't eat all the seafood, right? If the Chinese territorial waters around China are safe and clean, why not just take marine products in that Chinese territorial waters? Shouldn't Chinese eat only marine products from the Chinese territorial waters, such as the Yellow Sea? So, why do Chinese fishing boats poach in Japanese territorial waters?
    3
  4. China and South Korea are poaching in Japan's territorial waters, though. Then, have you ever wondered why they do so?
    2
  5.  @kilxyunyunl2829  Research on tritium removal technology is developing day by day in each country. At Japanese universities, research on tritium removal using a completely different method has succeeded. However, technology that can completely remove tritium has not yet been put into practical use. Therefore, the current situation is that all nations with nuclear power plants are forced to release more or less tritium. I don't understand why only Japan is beaten, even though other countries are doing the same.
    2
  6.  @kilxyunyunl2829  I'm not thinking of sinking other countries together. What I wanted to say is that as in other countries, properly treated treated water will be discharged.
    2
  7.  @kilxyunyunl2829  The treated water in Fukushima is the same as that in other countries. The IAEA acknowledges that too. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/iaea-ready-to-support-japan-on-fukushima-water-disposal-director-general-grossi-says
    2
  8.  @kilxyunyunl2829  Where is the source of that data?
    2
  9.  @kilxyunyunl2829  I can't answer if I don't know what you are based on.
    2
  10.  @kilxyunyunl2829  When talking to Chinese or Koreans, their rationale is often based on counterfeiting and lies.
    2
  11.  @kilxyunyunl2829  According to the reference to the report of sedaily's 4/14 article, the Korean government concluded in the 2020 survey that there is no problem with the treated water in Fukushima.
    2
  12.  @kilxyunyunl2829  You guys are trying to spread the rumors and hurt Japan, knowing that there is no problem. This is a crime.
    2
  13. Even in modern science, the technology to completely remove tritium has not been put into practical use. In other words, nuclear power plants in every country discharge treated water containing tritium. Does your country have no nuclear power plants? If you have, see how your country's nuclear power plants treat radioactive water.
    2
  14. In 2020 October, South Korean experts reported that there would be no problem with the discharge of treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant. Did Koreans already forget it?
    2
  15. China also releases treated water containing tritium.
    2
  16.  @user-it8gk3ke7h  Yeah, all of the countries have NPP should be invested. It’s fair.
    2
  17.  @kairohs1974  Haha No one is blaming China here. Despite China's discharge of tritium-containing wastewater from China's nuclear power plants.
    2
  18. Even in modern science, the technology to completely remove tritium has not been put into practical use. In other words, nuclear power plants in every country discharge treated water containing tritium. Does your country have no nuclear power plants? If you have, see how your country's nuclear power plants treat radioactive water.
    2
  19.  @aerix12345  ALPS removes radioactive substances other than tritium, so there is no "difference" you say.
    2
  20.  @aerix12345  You seem to believe in biased information. Of course, there are still areas with high radiation levels. Access to these areas is restricted, so noone be allowed to farm or live in the area. Noone can get and export crops from non-agricultural areas.
    2
  21.  @aerix12345  I tried to give you the website of monitoring information, but pasting URL is not allowed. So, Search words this : Monitoring information of environmental radioactivity level
    2
  22.  @aerix12345  Or Try this URL removing a space before “en” radioactivity.nsr.go.jp/ en/
    2
  23. Even in modern science, the technology to completely remove tritium has not been put into practical use. In other words, nuclear power plants in every country discharge treated water containing tritium. Does your country have no nuclear power plants? If you have, see how your country's nuclear power plants treat radioactive water.
    2
  24. Well, the treated water from the South Korea's nuclear power plants contain 100 times more tritium than Fukushima's treated water, but the United States doesn't say anything about it. By the way, did South Korea repair all the cracks in the building of the Korean nuclear power plant?
    2
  25. Even in modern science, the technology to completely remove tritium has not been put into practical use. In other words, nuclear power plants in every country discharge treated water containing tritium. Does your country have no nuclear power plants? If you have, you can get information of treated water of your nuclear plant from your government.
    2
  26. Even in modern science, the technology to completely remove tritium has not been put into practical use. In other words, nuclear power plants in every country, including China, discharge treated water containing tritium.
    2
  27. Even in modern science, the technology to completely remove tritium has not been put into practical use. In other words, nuclear power plants in every country discharge treated water containing tritium. Does your country have no nuclear power plants? If you have, see how your country's nuclear power plants treat radioactive water.
    2
  28. In 2020 October, South Korean experts reported that there would be no problem with the discharge of treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant. Did Koreans already forget it?
    2
  29. Even in modern science, the technology to completely remove tritium has not been put into practical use. In other words, nuclear power plants in every country discharge treated water containing tritium. China ALSO discharge treated radioactive water, NOW. And the drainage of Fukushima is scheduled after two years. If something like what you say happens, which one do God's judges think will fall first?
    2
  30. Even in modern science, the technology to completely remove tritium has not been put into practical use. In other words, nuclear power plants in every country discharge treated water containing tritium.
    2
  31. Does your country have no nuclear power plants? If you have, see how your country's nuclear power plants treat treated water.
    2
  32.  @gingerpants-1  You said “as a Korean” in another comment.
    1
  33.  @Jkj11007  Hahaha You are the one to investigate more. Japan's territory, Okinotorishima, is certainly reinforced with concrete to prevent and conserve further wave erosion due to rising sea levels. But, Japan does not reclaim reefs in other countries and build runways like China does.
    1
  34. BEIJING (Kyodo) -- Chinese nuclear power plants released wastewater containing tritium in 2022 at levels up to nine times higher than the amount expected to be found in the planned annual discharge from Japan's crippled Fukushima Daiichi complex, a public document showed Saturday. Mar.9.2024
    1
  35. They will be processed in the Alps before release. By the way, has the situation where the contaminated water of the Wolseong Nuclear Power Station leaked and polluted the surrounding area improved? Or Has the Oyama Nuclear Power Station succeeded in avoiding an explosion?
    1
  36. In 2020 October, South Korean experts reported that there would be no problem with the discharge of treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant. Did Koreans already forget it?
    1
  37.  @winterwolf1  Haha Then, let's all drink the treated water from the nuclear power plants in each country have NPP! I will drink the treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant if I get it two years later, so you drink the treated water from the Wolseong nuclear power plant.
    1
  38.  @winterwolf1  Because there are people who shout bad lies like you are looking now. They damage the sales of marine products. As a result, fishermen and related workers suffer losses. Koreans and Chinese may think they are just beating the Japanese government. But it directly damege the Japanese people who are the general fishermen and related workers. If it is released away somewhere in Japan, that area will be damaged by rumors. So, there was nothing but storage to avoid this. However, storage will reach its limit in the next two years. Therefore, as it is done in every country have NPP, the treated water discharge to the sea has been decided. It has been recommended by the IAEA.
    1
  39.  @winterwolf1  ALPS removes radioactive substances other than tritium. Therefore, the treated water to be discharged from Fukushima contains only tritium like the treated water of other nuclear power plants.
    1
  40.  @winterwolf1  By the way, according to the IAEA report, the use of a dedicated tritium removal device was also considered to remove tritium. But, due to the low tritium concentration of the treated water after purification with ALPS, there was not much effect of reducing the tritium concentration by using the tritium removal device. Therefore, it was decided that the tritium removal device would not be used in Fukushima. In other words, ALPS has the ability to remove tritium to some extent.
    1
  41. The IAEA said, "Japan should release treated water." This means that the treated water that Japan plans to release is in line with the IAEA regulations.
    1
  42.  @brianrok79  HAHAHA You should ask IAEA not here.
    1
  43.  @brianrok79  https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/iaea-ready-to-support-japan-on-fukushima-water-disposal-director-general-grossi-says
    1
  44.  @brianrok79  Hahaha Well, you should come to the inspection. BTW, why is South Korea not in public the report on "Contaminated water status at Fukushima nuclear power plant"?
    1
  45.  @brianrok79  Hahaha Then, why the report is not in public?
    1
  46.  @brianrok79  Good. But, Seeing is believing, right? Can you believe that it's okay for the government or etc. to just say "it’s OK"?
    1
  47.  @brianrok79  Eh, did South Korea investigate without permission? That's why it can't be made public lol
    1
  48.  @brianrok79  There is a reference to the report in sedaily's 4/14 article.
    1
  49.  @brianrok79  LOL So what do you think is a problem, even though this report on October 15, 2020 concludes that there are no problems with Fukushima's treated water discharge? Didn't you say you believed in the government announcement?
    1
  50.  @brianrok79  Hahaha If you can't believe South Korea's October 15 report, wait for the results of the joint test. I think it's a waste of time and money because you'll get the same results.
    1