Comments by "115islands Compass" (@115islandscompass6) on "Japan Shock China u0026 Reveals 5 Never Before Seen Weapons" video.

  1.  @bt7528  Aren't you the one who forgot? MacArthur said in a speech in the Senate immediately after returning to the United States that most of Japan's wars were for security. In other words, they were not for the invasion.
    3
  2. why?
    1
  3. If China doesn't threaten Japan, there is no need to waste military spending.
    1
  4. Like you said in the comment above, it is always Chinese that says, "We should make a nuclear saturation attack‼︎"
    1
  5.  @RudyT1000  The United States has limited, and continues to limit, Japan's ability to build up its military. America is greedy, so it is highly questionable whether Japan is actually improving its defense capabilities commensurate with the military expenditures it has paid. Most of Japan's military systems are purchased from the United States, and to put it simply, the operating systems are also made in the United States, so Japan has no choice but to purchase most of its weapons from the United States. Therefore, Japan, which must comply with the FMS agreement, is forced to purchase outdated recycled weapons at several times the price. And even after Japan pays for the purchase, the United States often does not hand over the weapons. For example, an Osprey delivered in 2023 is scheduled to be discontinued in 2025, even though it was ordered nine years ago. Half of the tomahawks that Japan's current prime minister recently promised the current U.S. president to buy are obsolete. Under these circumstances, it is difficult to imagine that Japan will be able to secure a defense force commensurate with the defense expenditures it has paid.
    1