Comments by "115islands Compass" (@115islandscompass6) on "FRANCE 24 English" channel.

まず第一にフランスの人達がなぜ日本人の失踪に興味を持つのか理解できない。 First of all, I don't understand why French people are interested in the disappearance of Japanese people.
2
Hahaha stop lying. He is currently a member of the House of Representatives.
2
하나님의 공돌이 Oh, sorry. I said misinformation. He retired from politics in 2015. But no obituary has been announced.
2
하나님의 공돌이 Hahaha If he's sick or dead, the Japanese anti-Japanese leftist media will shout loudly to report it. We don't know what he's doing right now because he's no longer a public figure.
2
하나님의 공돌이 Haha Then, let's all drink the treated water from the nuclear power plants in each country have NPP! I will drink the treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant if I get it two years later, so you drink the treated water from the Wolseong nuclear power plant.
2
하나님의 공돌이 In 2020 October, South Korean experts reported that there would be no problem with the discharge of treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant. Did Koreans already forget it?
2
So why does the US buy seafood from China and South Korea, even though the US knows that China and South Korea are poaching in Japan's territorial waters?
1
I know where Fukushima is and how the ocean currents flow. And even in areas close to China, Japanese fishermen are harvesting marine products. And the Fukushima nuclear power plant has not yet discharged water. It's two years later. On the other hand, Chinese fishing boats come together to rush to Japan's territorial waters and try to take everything. Too many fishing boats from China invade the territorial waters and attack Japanese fishing boats, so there are many cases where Japanese fishing boats cannot fish. Knowing these, the US act of importing Chinese seafood is to tolerate these robbers. And why are the marine products caught from the same place imported by Chinese fishing boats and not imported by Japanese fishing boats?
1
ALPS removes radioactive substances other than tritium. Therefore, the treated water to be discharged from Fukushima contains only tritium like the treated water of other nuclear power plants. By the way, according to the IAEA report, the use of a dedicated tritium removal device was also considered to remove tritium in Fukushima. But, due to the low tritium concentration of the treated water after purification with ALPS, there was not much effect of reducing the tritium concentration by using the tritium removal device. Therefore, it was decided that the tritium removal device would not be used in Fukushima. In other words, ALPS has the ability to remove tritium to some extent.
1
@UC9fBVJIGa4rI-JOIuzJ3HIw The water discharge from the Fukushima nuclear power plant will begin about two years later. Before that, it will be filtered again. So we can't drink it now. By the way, the concentration of radioactive substances contained in the treated water after the final filtration is 1/7 of the FDA's concentration limit of radioactive substances in drinking water. In other words, according to the FDA, there may be beverages that contain more radioactive substances than the treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant, and it is okay to drink them.
1
@augustely1844 If so, Koreans and Chinese will now make a fuss about "Japanese vegetables are dirty!" The Japanese fishery has already been severely damaged by image damage. I think the Japanese government should sue them for the damage caused by the dissemination of rumors by Chinese and Koreans.
1
@xiaoleilee7171 ALPS removes radioactive substances other than tritium. Therefore, the treated water to be discharged from Fukushima contains only tritium like the treated water of other nuclear power plants. The water discharge from the Fukushima nuclear power plant will begin about two years later. Before that, it will be filtered again. So we can't drink it now. By the way, the concentration of radioactive substances contained in the treated water after the final filtration is 1/7 of the FDA's concentration limit of radioactive substances in drinking water. In other words, according to the FDA, there may be beverages that contain more radioactive substances than the treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant, and it is okay to drink them.
1
@Augste Ly Instead of sueing, the Japanese government is demanding that information on treated water discharged from South Korea's nuclear power plants be released to South Korea. But they haven't done that yet. On the other hand, if the bad publicity from China continues, we will request China in the same way. Comparing the analysis of treated water that Fukushima plans to drain with the analysis of treated water that China and South Korea are currently draining should prove that their claims are correct. Therefore, Chinese and Koreans need to require the government to publish their data on treated water.
1
@buddha199115 Hahaha Who blamed on every thing on China when and where? The reason China is blamed here is that China blames Japan and spreads bad rumor including lies, even though China emits NOW 10 times more tritium from China's NPP than the amount of tritium of planing to emit from Fukushima two years later. If you want to order the drainage from the Fukushima NPP to drain into a domestic lake, shouldn't China do it first?
1
@Fruush spices? Do you mean the species of living things? It seems that Korea teaches that way. Are you Korean? By the way, that's not true. When Japan went to the Korean Peninsula, it seems that there weren't many wild animals such as monkeys anymore. That was because there were few trees in the mountains of the Korean Peninsula at that time. It seems that the disappearance of the plants that form the basis of the food chain had destroyed the ecosystem itself, making it impossible for wild animals to live there. After the merger, Japan planted a large number of trees in the mountains of the Korean Peninsula and nature was restored.
1
Then, why China and South Korea are poaching in Japan's territorial waters?
1
Why does the US buy seafood from China and South Korea, even though the US knows that China and South Korea are poaching in Japan's territorial waters and also knows that the water will be released two years later?
1
While making a fuss about the release of treated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant more than a year away, why don't you report anything about the Walson nuclear power plant, which has been leaking contaminated water for more than two years?
1
China is currently draining treated water containing tritium from China's nuclear power plants. It contains 10 times more tritium than the treated water that will be discharged from Fukushima. Tritium will be non-radioactive in about 12 years, so it will be harmless two years after it is scheduled to be drained. So if Fukushima's treated water is sent to China, it will purify China and please them.
1
하나님의 공돌이 The report is not in public. So, You won't find the report itself, but you'll find news articles about it. I read the article with the summary of the report was titled “Fukushima Nuclear Power Contaminated Water Status” Because link pasting is not allowed here, so search the above title.
1
하나님의 공돌이 It seems that neither linking nor specifying the search term is allowed here.
1
하나님의 공돌이 Sigh. You are a typical Korean. Just search for the following words: “후 쿠 시 마 원 전 오 염 수 관 련 현 황”
1
하나님의 공돌이 https://s.japanese.joins. com/jarticle/277662?sectcode=a10&servcode=a00 Delete 2 spaces before com てか､消すなよYOUTUBE💢💢💢
1
中央日報4/15/2021より「「日本の原発水、影響大きくない」　韓国政府ＴＦ、昨年報告書出していた」日本政府が１３日午前、閣議で福島原発汚染水の海洋放出を決定したことと関連し、韓国政府は昨年「科学的に問題ない」という趣旨の報告書を出していたことが確認された。１４日、野党「国民の力」の安炳吉（アン・ビョンギル）議員によると、海洋水産部をはじめ政府部署合同タスクフォース（ＴＦ、作業部会）は昨年１０月、「福島原発汚染水関連現況」という題名の対策報告書を作成した。当時の状況を「日本が福島原子力発電所内に保管中の汚染水処分方案の決定を完了し、発表時期の決定だけが残っている」と評価した報告書で、韓国政府は日本が放出する汚染水が国民と環境に及ぼす影響を分析した。報告書によると、原子力安全委員会は専門家懇談会を７回開き、「汚染水を浄化する日本の多核種除去設備（ＡＬＰＳ）の性能に問題がない」との判断を下した。また、国際標準と認められる原子放射線の影響に関する国連科学委員会（ＵＮＳＣＥＡＲ）の手法を使い、日本海岸近隣地域の放射線影響を評価した結果、放射線数値が「妥当だ」とも評価した。韓国沿岸海域を対象にした放射能濃度調査では、２０１９年基準０．８９２～１．８８ミリベクレル毎キログラムが検出されたが、これは福島事故以前の平均値（２００６～２０１０年０．８６４～４．０４ミリベクレル毎キログラム）と類似していると分析した。三重水素（トリチウム）露出の可能性に対しては「生体で濃縮・蓄積されにくく、水産物摂取などによる有意味な被ばくの可能性は非常に低い」とし、汚染水の韓国海域拡散の可能性に対しては「海洋放出から数年後、国内海域に到達しても海流により移動して拡散・希釈されて有意味な影響はないだろう」とした。
1
From JoongAng Ilbo 4/15/2021 "" Nuclear water in Japan is not significantly affected. "The Korean government TF issued a report last year." It was confirmed that the Korean government issued a report last year saying that there was no scientific problem in connection with the Japanese government's decision to release contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant into the ocean on the morning of the 13th. According to Ahn Byung-gil, a member of the opposition party "People Power Party," the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries and other government departments' joint task force (TF, working group) announced in October last year that "the current situation related to contaminated water at the Fukushima nuclear power plant." A countermeasure report entitled "" was created. In a report that evaluated the situation at that time as "Japan has completed the decision on the disposal plan for contaminated water stored in the Fukushima nuclear power plant, and only the decision on the timing of announcement remains", the Korean government said that the pollution released by Japan We analyzed the impact of water on the people and the environment. According to the report, the Nuclear Safety Commission held seven expert meetings and decided that "there is no problem with the performance of Japan's multi-nuclide removal facility (ALPS) that purifies contaminated water." In addition, as a result of evaluating the radiation effects in the area near the coast of Japan using the method of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), which is recognized as an international standard, the radiation values were also evaluated as "reasonable". In the radioactivity concentration survey in the coastal waters of South Korea, the 2019 standard of 0.892 to 1.88 millibecquerels per kilogram was detected, which is the average value before the Fukushima accident (2006 to 2010 0.864 to 4). It was analyzed to be similar to .04 millibecquerels per kilogram). Regarding the possibility of tritium exposure, he said, "It is difficult for the body to concentrate and accumulate, and the possibility of meaningful exposure due to ingestion of marine products is very low." "A few years after the release into the ocean, even if it reaches the domestic sea area, it will be moved by the ocean current and diffused and diluted, and there will be no meaningful effect."
1
중앙 일보 2021 년 4 월 15 일 ""일본의 원자력은 큰 영향을받지 않습니다. "한국 정부 TF는 작년에 보고서를 발표했습니다." 한국 정부가 지난해 13 일 오전 일본 정부가 후쿠시마 원전에서 오염 된 물을 바다로 배출하기로 결정한 것과 관련하여 과학적 문제가 없다는 보고서를 발표 한 것으로 확인됐다. 야당 '인민 권력 당'안병길에 따르면 해양 수산부 등 부처 합동 태스크 포스 (TF, 실무반)는 지난해 10 월 '현재 상황은 후쿠시마 원자력 발전소의 오염 된 물에. " ""라는 제목의 대책 보고서가 작성되었습니다. 당시 상황을 "일본은 후쿠시마 원전에 저장된 오염 수 처리 계획에 대한 결정을 완료했으며, 발표 시점에 대한 결정 만 남아있다"고 당시 상황을 평가 한 보고서에서 한국 정부는 일본이 배출 한 오염물이 사람과 환경에 미치는 영향을 분석했습니다. 이 보고서에 따르면 원자력 안전위원회는 7 번의 전문가 회의를 열고 "오염 수를 정화하는 일본의 다핵 종 제거 시설 (ALPS) 성능에 문제가 없다"고 결정했다. 또한 국제 표준으로 인정 된 유엔 원자력 방사선 영향 과학위원회 (UNSCEAR)의 방법을 사용하여 일본 연안 인근 지역의 방사선 영향을 평가 한 결과, 방사선 값 또한 "합리적"으로 평가되었습니다. 한국 연안 해역의 방사능 농도 조사에서 2019 년 기준 킬로그램 당 0.892 ~ 1.88 밀리 베크렐이 검출되었으며, 이는 후쿠시마 사고 이전 평균치 (2006 ~ 2010 0.864 ~ 4)입니다. 킬로그램 당 .04 밀리 베크렐과 유사한 것으로 분석되었습니다.) 삼중 수소 노출 가능성에 대해 그는 "몸이 집중 및 축적되기 어렵고 수산물 섭취로 인한 의미있는 노출 가능성이 매우 낮다"고 말했다. "해양으로 방출 된 지 몇 년이 지나면 국내 해역에 도달하더라도 해류에 의해 이동하여 확산되고 희석되어 의미있는 효과가 없을 것입니다."
1
하나님의 공돌이 No matter how many times I write the URL or search word, YouTube deletes the comment each time, so I wrote the excerpt of the first half of the article in Japanese, English and Korean.
1
하나님의 공돌이 Sigh ... I wrote the above comments because you said, "Show me the evidence that the conclusion that Fukushima's treated water release will be okay showed in Korea last year". Did you read them properly? You are the one who stops lying.
1
하나님의 공돌이 I wrote one above.
1